Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 46
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Funnily enough, we have totally opposite experiences :S

Optimax the car runs fine, gives (relatively) ok fuel economy, smells nice when it burns....

Ultimate it keeps misfiring, stalling at idle and gives really bad economy.

Bizzare huh?

So yeah, we use optimax.

My laser runs on whatever bowser I pull up at, be it optimax, LRP, ULP or PULP. Havent tried diesel yet, but I dare say it will run on that too :D ... 1980s ECUs give no fark for fuel. Or o2 sensor readings. Or more than one map. My ECU is no more advanced than some little chinese kid with an abacus.

Since optimax is plentiful nearby, and where i shop i get discount vouchers (no plugs) I tuned on Optimax. Sure it may be the worst choice of the 3, but if you tune for the good stuff and get caught out it could be an expensive error. I actually found Mobil 8000 pretty good but they are consistently way more expensive and have no discounts.

With 220rwkw I don't need to hunt for a couple of kw extra on fuel type, but if the difference was 50kw I would consider it.

He said that they tested fuels and for the best tuning results it was.

1. Ultimate

2. Synergy 8000

3. Optimax.

:werd:

Ultimate is tops. I went off Synergy when I got a bad batch but its up there. I wont go near Opticrap.

Haven't you guys ever heard of Refinery Sharing? There is not one refinery for every brand in every city, so the petrol companies share.

You really need to check out your local supplies. Just because it says "Shell" on the servo doesn't mean that all the petrol sold there came from a Shell refinery. In Qld, WA and SA, Shell don't have 98 octane enabled refineries, so my understanding is they buy it from BP. Being Kwinana in WA and Bulwer Island in Qld. In NSW and Vic it is the reverse, the refinery at Clyde produces something like 25% of Australia's total petrol and the Geelong refinery produces about 50% of Victoria's petrol.

Mobil have 2 refineries in Australia, at Altona in Vic and Adelaide in SA. Only Altona is 98 ron enabled and it produces ~13% of Australia's fuel. In comparison Adelaide is a small refinery, doesn't have the technology to produce 98 ron and is currently not operational.

So my understanding is;

In Qld, WA and SA all Optimax, Ultimate and Synergy is refined by BP

In NSW and Vic all Optimax and Ultimate is refined by Shell

In NSW Synergy 8000 is refined by Shell

In Vic Synergy 8000 is refined by Mobil

As for Caltex/Ampol, the company owns and operates two fuel refineries, one at Kurnell in Sydney and the other at Lytton in Brisbane. Neither of them are 98 ron enabled. So I will leave Vortex out of further discussion. :Bang:

Bottom line, I don't think you can say that Optimax is this and Ultimate is that and Synergy is something else, it really depends on from where it is sourced.

I have told this to a number of people and some doubt it and quote all sorts of reasons why it can't be so. My answer is go to.......

http://www.bp.com.au/refineries/refineries...es.asp?menuid=d

and read up on Refinery Sharing.

Hope that helps

how long has BP ultimate been around for? I have used optimax for about 3 years and have had no problem with it, in fact i wont use anything else, unless you guys prove me otherwise. I tuned my car on optimax and it made 323.5 kw at all four wheels with no problems..... Im shocked to see that there are so many people against optimax. Silverwater Automotive certainly dont have problems with it...

BP Ultimate is a newer product yeah?

TG

So some people are saying there is a more consistent 98 octane in Ultimate, my dyno tuners think the same about Ultimate as their experience with Ultimate is that it has allowed them to tune harder.

I am getting my car Re Dyno tuned in about 2 weeks once the guys are back from Jamobree. I'll post the results between Optimax & Ultimate.

Until then i wont dis optimax but will certainly take in consideration to a lot of negative stories i've heard about Optimax and not a single negative comment about Ultimate.

Ultimate will do me fine, I wish there was a good 100 octane fuel at the pump, i'd love to use that....

Haven't you guys ever heard of Refinery Sharing? There is not one refinery for every brand in every city, so the petrol companies share.

You really need to check out your local supplies. Just because it says "Shell" on the servo doesn't mean that all the petrol sold there came from a Shell refinery. In Qld, WA and SA, Shell don't have 98 octane enabled refineries, so my understanding is they buy it from BP. Being Kwinana in WA and Bulwer Island in Qld. In NSW and Vic it is the reverse, the refinery at Clyde produces something like 25% of Australia's total petrol and the Geelong refinery produces about 50% of Victoria's petrol.

Mobil have 2 refineries in Australia, at Altona in Vic and Adelaide in SA. Only Altona is 98 ron enabled and it produces ~13% of Australia's fuel. In comparison Adelaide is a small refinery, doesn't have the technology to produce 98 ron and is currently not operational.

So my understanding is;

In Qld, WA and SA all Optimax, Ultimate and Synergy is refined by BP

In NSW and Vic all Optimax and Ultimate is refined by Shell

In NSW Synergy 8000 is refined by Shell

In Vic Synergy 8000 is refined by Mobil

As for Caltex/Ampol, the company owns and operates two fuel refineries, one at Kurnell in Sydney and the other at Lytton in Brisbane. Neither of them are 98 ron enabled. So I will leave Vortex out of further discussion. :Bang:  

Bottom line, I don't think you can say that Optimax is this and Ultimate is that and Synergy is something else, it really depends on from where it is sourced.

I have told this to a number of people and some doubt it and quote all sorts of reasons why it can't be so. My answer is go to.......  

http://www.bp.com.au/refineries/refineries...es.asp?menuid=d

and read up on Refinery Sharing.

Hope that helps

But just because they are refined in the same place doesn't mean they're the same product surely? Shell spent millions on developing Opimax. Why would the others do the same when they could've just borrowed the recipe off Shell? Panasonic, Technics, and Digitor (Dick Smith brand) are all assembled in the same factory but produce very different products in terms of looks, reliability etc.

But just because they are refined in the same place doesn't mean they're the same product surely? Shell spent millions on developing Opimax. Why would the others do the same when they could've just borrowed the recipe off Shell? Panasonic, Technics, and Digitor (Dick Smith brand) are all assembled in the same factory but produce very different products in terms of looks, reliability etc.

OK let's go with one example only, sulphur content. People tell you that Optimax has higher sulphur content than Ultimate. It rots your engine, destroys your paintwork, makes your car smell like a dunny etc etc. Well the reality is excess sulpher comes about from two related reasons. Firstly the source crude that you get and the cracker technology that you use. They are related because old technology crackers can't use low sulphur crude.

Adding a few secret herbs and spices does not magically reduce the sulphur content. You have to upgrade the refinery (at a cost of many tens of millions of dollars), then you can use low sulphur feed and bingo you get lower sulphur content in the finished product.

Since BP admit to using Shell refinered fuel in NSW, it is therefore impossible for BP fuel to have lower sulphur content than Shell fuel in NSW.

Before the chemical engineers rip into me, yes I have simplified this down for the readers. Hopefully not too far for the experts.

Make sense? :D

Of course it makes sense. But doesnt prove that they're the same final product.

In my experience I can say that Ultimate is this and Optimax is that because it is what I have observed when using the fuel. To say Ultimate and Optimax are the same fuel besause they come from the same place doesnt make sense because I have experienced otherwise. :P

i remember on today tonight (yea i know very reputable) that some petrol companies add something to their fuel to identify it.

is this true and could this be why even tho the fuels are the same effects are different?

Of course it makes sense. But doesnt prove that they're the same final product.  

In my experience I can say that Ultimate is this and Optimax is that because it is what I have observed when using the fuel. To say Ultimate and Optimax are the same fuel besause they come from the same place doesnt make sense because I have experienced otherwise. :P

My real world experiences, we have 5 cars that use PULP and 3 of them see the dyno fairly often. I have used Ultimate and Optimax in each of them many many times, we have a very large Shell and a large BP nearby so the fuel is always fresh. In the last 6 months or so, the BP has had Ultimate, previously we used 100% Optimax. Since using Ultimate, I have never seen or felt any difference, on the dyno, driving daily, on the track, in the fuel filters when we replace them or on the spark splugs when we pull them.

Bottom line;

1. oil companies refinery share (it's a fact)

2. additives don't change the basic supply (if it has excess sulphur from refining, it will have excess sulphur when it goes into your tank).

3. personally I can't see or feel any difference

So we now buy according to the price when we need fuel, Tuesdays is cheaper at BP and Thursdays is cheaper at Shell. You can make your own judgement. :D

PS; remember this is Sydney fuel, I have obviously not done this in Perth where Ultimate is demonstrably superior, both from a crude sense and refinery technology. I would always use Ultimate in Perth.

  • 3 weeks later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I got back to Japan in January and was keen to get back on track as quickly as possible. Europe is god-awful for track accessibility (by comparison), so I picked up a first-gen GT86 in December just to have something I could jump into right away. The Skyline came over in a container this time and landed in early January. It was a bit battered after Europe, though—I refused to do anything beyond essential upkeep while it was over there. The clutch master cylinder gave out, and so did the power steering. I didn’t even bother changing the oil; it was the same stuff that went in just before I left Japan the first time. Naughty. Power steering parts would’ve cost double with shipping and taxes, so knowing I’d be heading back to Japan, I just postponed it and powered through the arm workout. It took a solid three months to get the car back on the road. Registration was a nightmare this time around. There were a bunch of BS fees to navigate, and sourcing parts was a headache. I needed stock seats for shaken, mistakenly blew 34k JPY on some ENR34 seats—which, of course, didn’t fit—then ended up having the car’s technical sheet amended to register it as a two-seater with the Brides. Then there’s the GT86. Amazing car. Does everything I want it to do. Parts are cheap, easy to find, and I don’t care what anyone says—it’s super rewarding to drive. I’ve done a few basic mods: diff ratio, coilovers, discs, pads, seat, etc. It already had a new exhaust manifold and the 180kph limiter removed, so I assume it’s running some kind of map. I’ve just been thrashing it at the track non-stop—mostly Fuji Speedway now, since I need something with higher speed after all that autobahn time. The wheels on the R34 always pissed me off—too big, and it was a nightmare getting tires to fit properly under the arches. So I threw in the towel and bought something that fits better. Looks way cleaner too (at least to me)—less hotboy, less attention-seeking. Still an R34, though. Now for future plans. There are a few things still outstanding with the car. First up, the rear subframe needs an overhaul—that’s priority one. Next, I need to figure out an engine rebuild plan. No timeline yet, but I want to keep it economical—not cutting corners, just not throwing tens of thousands at a mechanic I can barely communicate with. And finally, paint. Plus a bit of tidying up here and there.  
    • Nope, needed to clearance under the bar a little with a heat gun, a 1/2" extension as the "clearancer", and big hammer, I was aware of this from the onset, they fit a 2.0 with this intake no problems, but, the 2.5 is around 15mm taller than a 2.0, so "clearancing" was required  It "just" touched when test fitting, now, I have about 10mm of clearance  You cannot see where it was done, and so far, there's no contact when giving it the beans Happy days
    • It's been a while since I've updated this thread. The last year (and some) has been very hectic. In the second-half of 2024 I took the R34 on a trip through Germany, Italy, France and Switzerland - it was f*cking great. I got a little annoyed with the attention the car was getting around Europe and really didn't drive it that much. I could barely work on the car since I was living in an inner-city apartment (with underground parking). During the trip, the car lost power steering in France - split hose - and I ended up driving around 4,000kms with no power steering.  There were a few Nurburgring trips here and there, but in total the R34 amassed just shy of 7,000kms on European roads. Long story short, I broke up with the reason I was transferred to Europe for and requested to be moved back to Japan. The E90, loved it. It was a sunk cost of around EUR 10,000 and I sold it to a friend for EUR 1,500 just to get rid of it quickly. Trust me, moving countries f*cking sucks and I could not be bothered to be as methodical as I was the first time around.
    • I assume clearances were all a-okay?
×
×
  • Create New...