Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hey i was ondering if anyone would be able to share some information on the gtr plenums and the greddy plenums in terms of flow characteristics and efficiency etc. I got the gtr plenum which we are adapting to my RB25 head. In long term chasing a max of 450hp at the wheels, im not really concerned about the gtr plenums efficiency as there ar many gtrs that make nice numbers still using original plenums so im assuming there good. Any advantages going greddy over gtr?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/51507-gtr-plenum-v-greddy-plenum/
Share on other sites

well im going to have to stick with what i have for the moment, i cant see there being any dramas with the GTR plenum. Single 85mm throttle body is probably the choice too. Im not expecting to make any big power till i can upgrade from a high flow to a bigger turbo. I havent done much research on gt30's etc, im more hooked on TD06-25Gs or T04R but will see thats a fair way down the track as i spent all i could on the motor and motor accessories getting it strong.

Hi sweetr33, just in case you haven't seen or done the numbers for yourself, here is the comparison between a single 100 mm throttle body and the standard GTR multiple (6) throttle butterflies. Also following are some comments I wrote a while ago on this subject.

Butterfly = 44/2*44/2*22/7 = 1,521 sqmm

Spindle = 44 * 4 (from memory) = 176 sqmm

= 1,345 sq mm each X 6 = 8,070 sq mm

Compared to the big single.....

100/2*100/2*22/7 = 7,857 sq mm

Spindle = 100 X 6 = 600 sqmm

= 7,257 sqmm

So, the standard 6 throttle bodies are 11% larger than one 100 mm single throttle body.

But is this the right way to do the comparison? Since each cylinder fires individually (one at a time) then isn't each cylinder getting sole use of the 100 mm throttle body some of the time? Not all of the time because of valve timing overlap between cylinders and the volume of air contained in the plenum. So you would have to know the valve timing and the plenum volume and the engine rpm to work out each individual cylinders share of the 100 mm.

My opinion (for what it's worth) is that the main reason the Japs go to a single throttle body is so they can use MAP sensor driven ECU's. Multiple throttle bodies and MAP sensors don't go together very well, especially when you have big cams and lots of boost. Over some LARGE horsepower number, there is probably an airflow advantage, but I have no idea how LARGE it is.

What I can say for certain is there is far better throttle response for the GTR multiple throttle butterflies. Personally I have yet to see any power advantage from a 100 mm single throttle body and we are well over 625 bhp in our circuit race cars. I should also point out that the Brisbane Street machines R32 GTR runs 9's on radials with the standard GTR multiple throttle bodies.

Hope that helps :cheers:

I'm still running the stock plenum with multiple throttle bodies on my car and we made 617rwkw on my GTR at AutoSalon back in April.

The only reason I would use a single is for ease of tune.

The multiple throttle body is so much better for street response.

ok, the multiple v single tb thing. I am going to stick with the single, although i was referring to a 85mm single tb and the info was given at 100mm tb would the response be better from the smaller throttle body? I was reading on these forums that munro's street gtr is using a single 85mm tb insted of multiples???

Did you also work out what harm 6 10mm shafts do to airflow and the area they take up in your smallish intake runner or seen and heard them on a flow bench, The scream they make is amazing.Never seen any car respond faster than Pauls 100mm single on a Greddy manifold.Try before you knock it SK you WILL be amazed,then you can coment with athority.

Did you also work out what harm 6 10mm shafts do to airflow and the area they take up in your smallish intake runner or seen and heard  them on a flow bench, The scream they make is amazing.Never seen any car respond faster than Pauls 100mm single on a Greddy manifold.Try before you knock it SK you WILL be amazed,then you can coment with athority.

Steve, I have "tried it" both with a standard RB25 throttle body and a Foulcan throttle body. I could fee lthe slowness instantly on the road, and on the track it was disasterous. With the dog box we have ~50 milliseconds for a downshift and you MUST match the engine rpm with the gearbox rpm. Otherwise you end up with twisted splines on the input shaft from the triple plate clutch and missing teeth on the gears, particularly 2nd.

It is quite simple to understand why this is the case. With the multiple throttles there is very little air between the butterflies and the inlet valves. So when you close the throttle the airflow to the engine stops instantly, therefore so does its power production. Compare that to a single throttle body with a plenum in between the butterfly and the valves. The usual rule of thumb is at least double the engine capacity in the plenum, so on a 3.1 litre that's 6.2 litres. Plus that 6.2 litres is under boost just before you close the throttle, so at 1.5 bar it really has 9.3 litres of air in it. In addition, after you close the throttle, the plenum goes under vacuum, around 0.25 bar is not unusual, that's another 1.6 litres.

So when you close and reopen the throttle 7.8 litres of air flow dulls the response. On a 3.1 litre engine that's almost 5 revolutions of the crankshaft, at 7,500 rpm that's 666 milliseconds. That's more than 10 times slower than the gearbox will handle. To translate that into distance, at Bathurst it would mean we would be lapped twice during the race distance

Another way to look at it, Nissan designed the GTR to win races on the circuit, if they thought a single TB was better then they would have used it. Let's face it, a single TB is simpler to make, therefore cheaper, easier to tune and maintain. But Nissan went for multiple TB's, why? Because for their stated aim it was superior.

Let me close off with;

I have seen articles on Jap GTRS that run low nines still using the original 6 throttle bodies & a std plenum!!!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I would just put EBC back on the "I would not use their stuff" pile and move on.
    • Can I suggest you try EBC directly again and link them to as many competitor catalogues as you can to show their listing is incorrect, eg https://dba.com.au/product/front-4000-series-hd-brake-rotor-dba42304/ If you have access to an R33 GTST VIN and your VIN, you could also use a Nissan Parts lookup like Amayama to show them the part number is different between 33 GTST and 34 GTT which may get their attention
    • So i got reply from EBC and they just this site where you can clearly see those 296mm fronts on R34 GTT. I send them photos and "quotes" that 296mm are not for 34 GTT and they are too small. But it will be very hard to return them cuz nobody here knows 100% and they just copy those EBC catalogue :-D https://ebcbrakesdirect.com/automotive/nissan/skyline-r34
    • Hi, is the HKS  Tower Bar still available ? negotiable ? 🤔
    • From there, it is really just test and assemble. Plug the adapter cables from the unit into the back of the screen, then the other side to the car harness. Don't forget all the other plugs too! Run the cables behind the unit and screw it back into place (4 screws) and you should now have 3 cables to run from the top screen to the android unit. I ran them along the DS of the other AV units in the gap between their backets and the console, and used some corrugated tubing on the sharp edges of the bracket so the wires were safe. Plug the centre console and lower screen in temporarily and turn the car to ACC, the AV should fire up as normal. Hold the back button for 3 sec and Android should appear on the top screen. You need to set the input to Aux for audio (more on that later). I put the unit under the AC duct in the centre console, with the wifi antenna on top of the AC duct near the shifter, the bluetooth antenna on the AC duct under the centre console The GPS unit on top of the DS to AC duct; they all seem to work OK there are are out of the way. Neat cable routing is a pain. For the drive recorder I mounted it near the rear view mirror and run the cable in the headlining, across the a pillar and then down the inside of the a pillar seal to the DS lower dash. From there it goes across and to one USB input for the unit. The second USB input is attached to the ECUtec OBD dongle and the 3rd goes to the USB bulkhead connected I added in the centre console. This is how the centre console looks "tidied" up Note I didn't install the provided speaker, didn't use the 2.5mm IPod in line or the piggyback loom for the Ipod or change any DIP switches; they seem to only be required if you need to use the Ipod input rather than the AUX input. That's it, install done, I'll follow up with a separate post on how the unit works, but in summary it retains all factory functions and inputs (so I still use my phone to the car for calls), reverse still works like factory etc.
×
×
  • Create New...