Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hey Sk, is there going to be much difference if i use an 85mm throttle body? Or am i actualy better off trying bigger like 100mm?? Im not up with this airflow stuff so please inform me? I wont be racing around a circuit, it will be dily driven on street with occasional willowbank day for drags and drift. no circuit racing. does this make the single tb choice alittle better?

Steve, I have "tried it" both with a standard RB25 throttle body and a Foulcan throttle body.  I could fee lthe slowness instantly on the road, and on the track it was disasterous.  With the dog box we have ~50 milliseconds for a downshift and you MUST match the engine rpm with the gearbox rpm.  Otherwise you end up with twisted splines on the input shaft from the triple plate clutch and missing teeth on the gears, particularly 2nd.

It is quite simple to understand why this is the case.  With the multiple throttles there is very little air between the butterflies and the inlet valves.  So when you close the throttle the airflow to the engine stops instantly, therefore so does its power production.  Compare that to a single throttle body with a plenum in between the butterfly and the valves.  The usual rule of thumb is at least double the engine capacity in the plenum, so on a 3.1 litre that's 6.2 litres.  Plus that 6.2 litres is under boost just before you close the throttle, so at 1.5 bar it really has 9.3 litres of air in it.   In addition, after you close the throttle, the plenum goes under vacuum, around 0.25 bar is not unusual, that's another 1.6 litres.

So when you close and reopen the throttle 7.8 litres of air flow dulls the response.  On a 3.1 litre engine that's almost 5 revolutions of the crankshaft, at 7,500 rpm that's 666 milliseconds.  That's more than 10 times slower than the gearbox will handle.  To translate that into distance, at Bathurst it would mean we would be lapped twice during the race distance

Another way to look at it, Nissan designed the GTR to win races on the circuit, if they thought a single TB was better then they would have used it.  Let's face it, a single TB is simpler to make, therefore cheaper, easier to tune and maintain.  But Nissan went for multiple TB's, why?  Because for their stated aim it was superior.

Let me close off with;

Hey Sk, is there going to be much difference if i use an 85mm throttle body? Or am i actualy better off trying bigger like 100mm?? Im not up with this airflow stuff so please inform me? I wont be racing around a circuit, it will be dily driven on street with occasional willowbank day for drags and drift. no circuit racing. does this make the single tb choice alittle better?

An 85 mm butterfly or a 100 mm butterfly, it makes no difference in the example I have given above. It is the volume of air between the butterfly and the inlet valve that matters. Obviously if the turbo can supply more air than will flow though the buttefly, then bigger is better. But I personally have used a standard RB25 TB and inlet up to 450 bhp and it is certainly not a restriction at that power level. I have seen a Zeni Tani built 550 bhp RB25 with the standard TB and inlet and it did not seem to suffer either.

Regardless of whether it is for road or circuit, as most people know, I hate cars with poor throttle response, turbo cars already have too much for me, even at their best. So I see no reason to make it worse and, if everything else is equal, a single TB WILL make it worse. Well up to a power level that I have yet to exceed anyway.

If you are intending to use a MAP sensor driven ECU (not an AFM driven ECU) then go with the single TB, it makes the tuning so much easier. Multiple TB's and MAP sensors are not happy together.

Hope that answered your question. :)

sorry to be off topic but every post i see from sydneykid is of excellent quality and as others said he is teaching everyone something new :D

keep it up

so also with my rb26 with 6 throttles bodies, and autronics be a problem to tune with more power? (currently got 350hp atw, 12.0 @ 118mph)

cheers

Brad

i will be using a power fc with the single tb. Im alittle worried about the difficulty of adapting the gtr plenum to my rb25 head. Seems port design is different. i have no idea.

Power FC runs AFM's so the multiple throttle bodies would be OK. :D

You didn't really think that Nissan would make it easy to put RB26 (flagship) stuff on an RB25, did you? They simply didn't want the value of GTR's being deminished, so they made it as hard as possible. :headspin:

so also with my rb26 with 6 throttles bodies, and autronics be a problem to tune with more power? (currently got 350hp atw, 12.0 @ 118mph)

cheers

Brad

Hi Brad, not a problem for the Autronic, if well tuned of course, they can handle multiple throttle bodies :D

SK? so how hard is it to mount the gtr plenum to a rb25det? (r33 model) what mods would need to be done?

And to add to that, do u know anyone that could mod to fit the rb25 and wat price am i looking at?

SK u have turn me off the greddy plenum and onto the gtr one :D apart from the cost factor, by the sounds it much better :D

SK? so how hard is it to mount the gtr plenum to a rb25det? (r33 model) what mods would need to be done?

And to add to that, do u know anyone that could mod to fit the rb25 and wat price am i looking at?

SK u have turn me off the greddy plenum and onto the gtr one :D apart from the cost factor, by the sounds it much better ;)

Honestly it is cheaper to buy an RB26 top end and sell the RB25 top end, than it is to fabricate the stuff to make it fit an RB25. Plus you get all of the RB26 advantages, solid followers, valve springs, valves, ports, combustion chamber, squish etc etc. And the other parts, cams pulleys, no VVT etc are much cheaper and easier to get second hand for an RB26 than an RB25.

I have done the numbers 20+ times for people, it always works out cheaper in the long run, you get a better result and it's much easier to sell if you ever want to. :D

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • As discussed in the previous post, the bushes in the 110 needed replacing. I took this opportunity to replace the castor bushes, the front lower control arm, lower the car and get the alignment dialled in with new tyres. I took it down to Alignment Motorsports on the GC to get this work done and also get more out of the Shockworks as I felt like I wasn't getting the full use out of them.  To cut a very long story short, it ended up being the case the passenger side castor arm wouldn't accept the brand new bush as the sleeve had worn badly enough to the point you could push the new bush in by hand and completely through. Trying a pair of TRD bushes didn't fix the issue either (I had originally gone with Hardrace bushes). We needed to urgently source another castor arm, and thankfully this was sourced and the guys at the shop worked on my car until 7pm on a Saturday to get everything done. The car rides a lot nicer now with the suspension dialled in properly. Lowered the car a little as well to suit the lower profile front tyres, and just bring the car down generally. Eternally thankful for the guys down at the shop to get the car sorted, we both pulled big favours from our contacts to get it done on the Saturday.  Also plugged in the new Stedi foglights into the S15, and even from a quick test in the garage I'm keen to see how they look out on the road. I had some concerns about the length of the LED body and whether it'd fit in the foglight housing but it's fine.  I've got a small window coming up next month where I'll likely get a little paint work done on the 110 to remove the rear wing, add a boot wing and roof wing, get the side skirt fixed up and colour match the little panel on the tail lights so that I can install some badges that I've kept in storage. I'm also tempted to put in a new pair of headlights on the 110.  Until then, here's some more pictures from Easter this year. 
    • I would put a fuel pressure gauge between the filter and the fuel rail, see if it's maintaining good fuel pressure at idle going up to the point when it stalls. Do you see any strange behavior in commanded fuel leading up to the point when it stalls? You might have to start going through the service manual and doing a long list of sensor tests if it's not the fuel system for whatever reason.
    • Hi,  Just joined the forum so I could share my "fix" of this problem. Might be of use to someone. Had the same hunting at idle issue on my V36 with VQ35HR engine after swapping the engine because the original one got overheated.  While changing the engine I made the mistake of cleaning the throttle bodies and tried all the tricks i could find to do a throttle relearn with no luck. Gave in and took it to a shop and they couldn't sort it. Then took it to my local Nissan dealership and they couldn't get it to idle properly. They said I'd need to replace the throttle bodies and the ecu probably costing more than the car is worth. So I had the idea of replacing the carbon I cleaned out with a thin layer of super glue and it's back to normal idle now. Bit rough but saved the car from the wreckers 🤣
    • After my last update, I went ahead with cleaning and restoring the entire fuel system. This included removing the tank and cleaning it with the Beyond Balistics solution, power washing it multiple times, drying it thoroughly, rinsing with IPA, drying again with heat gun and compressed air. Also, cleaning out the lines, fuel rail, and replacing the fuel pump with an OEM-style one. During the cleaning process, I replaced several hoses - including the breather hose on the fuel tank, which turned out to be the cause of the earlier fuel leak. This is what the old fuel filter looked like: Fuel tank before cleaning: Dirty Fuel Tank.mp4   Fuel tank after cleaning (some staining remains): Clean Fuel Tank.mp4 Both the OEM 270cc and new DeatschWerks 550cc injectors were cleaned professionally by a shop. Before reassembling everything, I tested the fuel flow by running the pump output into a container at the fuel filter location - flow looked good. I then fitted the new fuel filter and reassembled the rest of the system. Fuel Flow Test.mp4 Test 1 - 550cc injectors Ran the new fuel pump with its supplied diagonal strainer (different from OEM’s flat strainer) and my 550cc injectors using the same resized-injector map I had successfully used before. At first, it idled roughly and stalled when I applied throttle. Checked the spark plugs and found that they were fouled with carbon (likely from the earlier overly rich running when the injectors were clogged). After cleaning the plugs, the car started fine. However, it would only idle for 30–60 seconds before stalling, and while driving it would feel like a “fuel cut” after a few seconds - though it wouldn’t fully stall. Test 2 – Strainer swap Suspecting the diagonal strainer might not be reaching the tank bottom, I swapped it for the original flat strainer and filled the tank with ~45L of fuel. The issue persisted exactly the same. Test 3 – OEM injectors To eliminate tuning variables, I reinstalled the OEM 270cc injectors and reverted to the original map. Cleaned the spark plugs again just in-case. The stalling and “fuel cut” still remained.   At this stage, I suspect an intermittent power or connection fault at the fuel pump hanger, caused during the cleaning process. This has led me to look into getting Frenchy’s fuel hanger and replacing the unit entirely. TL;DR: Cleaned and restored the fuel system (tank, lines, rail, pump). Tested 550cc injectors with the same resized-injector map as before, but the car stalls at idle and experiences what feels like “fuel cut” after a few seconds of driving. Swapped back to OEM injectors with original map to rule out tuning, but the issue persists. Now suspecting an intermittent power or connection fault at the fuel pump hanger, possibly cause by the cleaning process.  
×
×
  • Create New...