Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Yeah, but he has an RB20, you have RB25 different motors mate. I don't think that with the same mods you have he will make the same (or better) power.

Richard

Yeah, but read the post i was replying to mate. The one above my post.

He was asking about an R33 which means rb25det.

wil..

  • Replies 54
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

I have at the moment

- 3" Turbo Back

- FMIC

- Pod Filter

Will simply adding in an Exhaust Cam Gear add anymore power with standard ECU? Is it worth doing?

Id be looking at a Computer first, or SAFC.

The Cam gear will give you minimal power, but it all adds up then end.

indeed he was :Oops:

my mistake. Anyway, he shouldn't be whoring in the RB20DET 200rwkw thread! That's my excuse.

Richard

if your referring to me whoring the thread, i started the thread and am gettin different oppinons about each motor and the mods needed for 200kw at the wheels..

if your referring to me whoring the thread, i started the thread and am gettin different oppinons about each motor and the mods needed for 200kw at the wheels..

You need to be careful, it is not the same getting 200 rwkw out of an RB20 as it is out of an RB25. Most importantly the RB25 turbo flows 10% more air at 7 psi than the RB20 turbo does at 10 psi. The extra 500cc's is important, but nowhere near as import as the turbo. Then you have VVT on the RB25, not on the RB20.

So the mods that get you 200 rwkw on an RB25 won't get within 25 rwkw of that on an RB20. So you have to do more, and the turbo is where I would start as it is always going to be the first weakness that limits you. It limits you from both a power and reliability perspective. You have to run more boost and this means ineficiency, higher shaft rpm and extra heat are generated.

Hope that clarifies.

sorry to hijak but i got a question for u ppl...

my current mods are: 3" turbo back exhaust, POD filter. This is on a rb20det. I dynoed it and got 121rwkw @ 9psi, is this a normal figure? im confused coz some ppl say i should get more and i read on here some guy had the same mods as me and got 102rwkw

wats the deal?

I cant for the life of me see a 170rwkw RB20 feeling near as quick as the 200rwkws RB25. Properly setup they can come onto boost real hard, though the few i have been in start to plateau over 5,500rpm.

They still pull nicely, but the rush falls away, whereas the Rb20 has nowhere near th eoriginal rusk of power, but it compartively feels as though its pulling harder at 6,000rpm

Doctor 30 if your getting ignition break down then its not going to go hard of course.

Check your plug gap sizes i usually go .7 and run some NGK coppers or Bosch Coppers. and try that.

BR,

JH

That is exactly what mine does, pulls damn hard but then starts to miss and crap itself all the way to 7500rpm.  What the hell is causing this?

He could be down on compression/timing slightly out/computer in some queer mode/different size tyres different dyno blah blha etc etc

You cant really compare your mods and expect the same number from another car with the same.

What you can do is get each others REAL drag MPH from the track and match those up. :)

Br,

JH

sorry to hijak but i got a question for u ppl...

my current mods are: 3" turbo back exhaust, POD filter.  This is on a rb20det.  I dynoed it and got 121rwkw @ 9psi, is this a normal figure?  im confused coz some ppl say i should get more and i read on here some guy had the same mods as me and got 102rwkw

wats the deal?

What do u think of a rb20det with a GTR pump, Cam Gears Turbo back exhaust, r34 gtt cooler and 2530 running 13psi (for reliability). What do u think the results will be?

ROY - so are you saying a rb20 feels like its pulling hard even though it might not be???

Hi Yogi,

Everything but the Gtt cooler sounds great Im not sure of the flow etc with the GTT cooler though you will benefit with something like a GTR front mounted intercooler, "assuming you have this GTT cooler still side mounted".

I couldnt say what your results are becuase the most important thing you have left out which means its probably standard the ECU (not even remapped) ? With out the ecu you are not going to be getting the full benefit from these mods.

but id like to say you should crack over 200rwkw and the 13psi you should be able to wind that up as well :) once the ecu is in or remapped

BR,

JH

What do u think of a rb20det with a GTR pump, Cam Gears Turbo back exhaust, r34 gtt cooler and 2530 running 13psi (for reliability). What do u think the results will be?

ROY - so are you saying a rb20 feels like its pulling hard even though it might not be???

...ROY - so are you saying a rb20 feels like its pulling hard even though it might not be???

I don’t know exactly.

But I would have put money on a certain 180something rwkws R33 blowing me away in a straight line after going for a ride in it, yet next session at Eastern Creek it didnt have any straight line advantage..

I could easily keep with it and it came back to corner exits who carried the most speed onto the straight. It felt miles quicker they way it boosted hard, but mine was equally as quick even though by SOP it didn’t feel it :) So I think the nature of the power delivery can be very misleading

There is no doubt though if I was trying to keep up with him on the way to the pub after the track day I would definitely have trouble keeping up, a good example is when I followed a guy up the mountains a while ago and out of the 25km/h 180deg bends he blew me away, so much that I thought he was going for 1st gear, but he assures me he wasnt in 1st.

But if you are rowing the thing along at the track and you are in the right gear then it isn’t normally too bad…actually the left hander leading to Corporate Hill at Eastern Creek (turn 7?) is a tricky one as in 3rd gear I’m about 300-500rpm off where I need to be to keep with a std turbo’d R33, but just means I have to work those RB74s a bit harder coming into turn 9:)

Sorry SydneyKid I disagree.

As i race my cars at the track frequently and recieve the same MPH or with in 5mph everytime regardless of day/weather/track conditions.

if you get a good clean pass through all the gears your mph is a great example of the power that you are making. I have watched my cars through the modifications and had great success with this method I also get Dyno prints. Ive tried tyre sizes/pressure/suspension and different tunes and gear ratios all similar effects to the MPH.

My car made 277rwkw on the dyno yesterday is this an accurate figure of power ? Other days with different tyre sizes pressure and rubber ive made over 300rwkw. The amount of power lost through the wheels spinning made it inaccurate 4 people in the boot and strapped down tight didnt help it.

Some people like there dynos id rather MPH shows alot about the overall power of the car. IT also seperates the dyno read out bullshit artists and the true performance of your car and its modifications theres no better way in my book.

for instance,

SR20 180sx 14.1 @ 96mph

RB26 180sx 14.0 @ 126mph - Offuisly copious amounts of wheel spinning are causing his Time to be slow but look at the mph he has since bettered that time to a 12.2 @ 128mph showing simliar mph but better Time.

So an oil down effected his MPH what about an uncalibrated Dyno effecting his power output ? this could go on for ever, im talking clean dyno run V's clean drag run.

BR,

JH

Sorry japsky33, but I find that method less than reliable.  An example, I was at WSID last month doing some suspension tuning for a guy (no not a Skyline).  He did 7 runs during the day, 3 in the morning when it was cool and no wind.   One run was aborted, due to a half track oil down (not ours) and 3 runs in the afternoon when it was hot and there was a strong head wind.  The three runs in the afternoon where all slower both ET and TS, even though the 60' times where quicker.

Did the car suddenly loose a whole lot of horsepower?  Well it lost a handfull  because of the increased ambient temperature, but the real reason was because of the oil down and the strong head wind.  That was on the same track on the same day with the same driver, what if went to a different track on a different day with a different driver?

Not a chance, I'll stick to the engine dyno for my power numbers thanks, at least I don't have to worry about the weather (it's in a climate controlled room) and track conditions stuffing up my readings, not to mention driver skill.  :burnout:

my car stock when it arrived was pushing out 108rwkw.......i'd be happy with 150 with my mods listed.

Roy - i've driven two r33's which were slightly modded and i found that they pull so much better compared to the rb20 but no fun up top :)

if its not visible to see which one is cracked I have blown a few and ended up with a big crack down the middle but generally they wont fire at all in this state.

what you would do is see if you can borrow some for 30mins switch them over and through a process of Elimination determine which one(s) are causing the issue. I WOULD DO the spark plugs before the coil packs just to be 100% sure should only cost you around 25dollars and as for the coil packs ive seen them from 80dollars each.

BR,

JH

Japskyr33-  its the coil packs breaking down, sounds expensive

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Who did you have do the installation? I actually know someone who is VERY familiar with the AVS gear. The main point of contact though would be your installer.   Where are you based in NZ?
    • Look, realistically, those are some fairly chunky connectors and wires so it is a reasonably fair bet that that loom was involved in the redirection of the fuel pump and/or ECU/ignition power for the immobiliser. It's also fair to be that the new immobiliser is essentially the same thing as the old one, and so it probably needs the same stuff done to make it do what it has to do. Given that you are talking about a car that no-one else here is familiar with (I mean your exact car) and an alarm that I've never heard of before and so probably not many others are familiar with, and that some wire monkey has been messing with it out of our sight, it seems reasonable that the wire monkey should be fixing this.
    • Wheel alignment immediately. Not "when I get around to it". And further to what Duncan said - you cannot just put camber arms on and shorten them. You will introduce bump steer far in excess of what the car had with stock arms. You need adjustable tension arms and they need to be shortened also. The simplest approach is to shorten them the same % as the stock ones. This will not be correct or optimal, but it will be better than any other guess. The correct way to set the lengths of both arms is to use a properly built/set up bump steer gauge and trial and error the adjustments until you hit the camber you need and want and have minimum bump steer in the range of motion that the wheel is expected to travel. And what Duncan said about toe is also very true. And you cannot change the camber arm without also affecting toe. So when you have adjustable arms on the back of a Skyline, the car either needs to go to a talented wheel aligner (not your local tyre shop dropout), or you need to be able to do this stuff yourself at home. Guess which approach I have taken? I have built my own gear for camber, toe and bump steer measurement and I do all this on the flattest bit of concrete I have, with some shims under the tyres on one side to level the car.
    • Thought I would get some advice from others on this situation.    Relevant info: R33 GTS25t Link G4x ECU Walbro 255LPH w/ OEM FP Relay (No relay mod) Scenario: I accidentally messed up my old AVS S5 (rev.1) at the start of the year and the cars been immobilised. Also the siren BBU has completely failed; so I decided to upgrade it.  I got a newer AVS S5 (rev.2?) installed on Friday. The guy removed the old one and its immobilisers. Tried to start it; the car cranks but doesnt start.  The new one was installed and all the alarm functions seem to be working as they should; still wouldn't start Went to bed; got up on Friday morning and decided to have a look into the no start problem. Found the car completely dead.  Charged the battery; plugged it back in and found the brake lights were stuck on.  Unplugging the brake pedal switch the lights turn off. Plug it back in and theyre stuck on again. I tested the switch (continuity test and resistance); all looks good (0-1kohm).  On talking to AVS; found its because of the rubber stopper on the brake pedal; sure enough the middle of it is missing so have ordered a new one. One of those wear items; which was confusing what was going on However when I try unplugging the STOP Light fuses (under the dash and under the hood) the brake light still stays on. Should those fuses not cut the brake light circuit?  I then checked the ECU; FP Speed Error.  Testing the pump again; I can hear the relay clicking every time I switch it to ON. I unplugged the pump and put the multimeter across the plug. No continuity; im seeing 0.6V (ECU signal?) and when it switches the relay I think its like 20mA or 200mA). Not seeing 12.4V / 7-9A. As far as I know; the Fuel Pump was wired through one of the immobiliser relays on the old alarm.  He pulled some thick gauged harness out with the old alarm wiring; which looks to me like it was to bridge connections into the immobilisers? Before it got immobilised it was running just fine.  Im at a loss to why the FP is getting no voltage; I thought maybe the FP was faulty (even though I havent even done 50km on the new pump) but no voltage at the harness plug.  Questions: Could it be he didnt reconnect the fuel pump when testing it after the old alarm removal (before installing the new alarm)?  Is this a case of bridging to the brake lights instead of the fuel pump circuit? It's a bit beyond me as I dont do a lot with electrical; so have tried my best to diagnose what I think seems to make sense.  Seeking advice if theres for sure an issue with the alarm install to get him back here; or if I do infact, need an auto electrician to diagnose it. 
    • Then, shorten them by 1cm, drop the car back down and have a visual look (or even better, use a spirit level across the wheel to see if you have less camber than before. You still want something like 1.5 for road use. Alternatively, if you have adjustable rear ride height (I assume you do if you have extreme camber wear), raise the suspension back to standard height until you can get it all aligned properly. Finally, keep in mind that wear on the inside of the tyre can be for incorrect toe, not just camber
×
×
  • Create New...