Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 44
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

there is not much diff , headlights s1 black , s2 chrome ,s 3 xenon , all h/lights will fit all cars s3 are slightly different at the rear where they bolt on , they dont have the extensions .

steering wheels are different in s1 , s2 + 3 are the same but not 100% sure ( we have a s1 + s 3 we dont have a s 2 ) . the seats are different colour on s 3 ( red instead of blue and the grey is darker as well .

the head unit suround is diff on s3 texture and its got like a buuble .

all s 2+ 3 have 2 airbags as far as i know , some s 1 have 2 bags ( all purple that i've seen ) but most have 1 .

s 3 fuse box has gtr on it .

s3 lower lip is different to s1+2 and s 3 has a rear foglight + only 1 reverse light .

i cant think of anything else at the minute , ah red stiching on the steering on s 3 is another .

s1 jan 95 , s2 jan 96 +s3 beb 97

if you want to know anymore let me know especialy s1 +3

S3 has red trim behind the perforations on the doors as well (S2,S1 has blue)

S3 has N1 holes in the front bumper

i think S3 may also have the bonnet diffuser (?)

then of course there is the differences in GTR's and GTR V-Spec's across all series.

ATTESA pro (rear fins on the rear differential)

lower suspension

oh, then there is the N1 versions :cheers: they have no A/C or Stereo, bigger turbo's, oil cooler, diff cooler (?), N1 slots in bumper

VIN is pretty much the same as a normal GTR but obviously corresponds to an N1, my VIN is BCNR33005923 which corresponds to a White 1995 V-spec N1. As for the differences they've been covered before, its bloody hard to search as the engine doesn't like looking for little words like N1. Theres a lot of different information going round too but the main things are:

R33 N1 based on the V-spec model except:

Interior: No air con (button replaced with a blank cover), no radio, less sound deadening, the little button on the drivers door that unlocks the far side is blanked out too, the doors have room for speakers etc but they aren't installed.

Exterior: Blanking plug where antenna should be (mine has the antenna put back on (AND DOESN"T WORK!!), front and rear CF diffusers, CF rear blade, suspension and ATTESA is apparently upgraded but i haven't been able to find any info on this

Engine:

N1 turbos (steel wheel)

Upgraded ECU (Mine came with a Mines)

Slightly stronger pistons etc, guy told me he's seen the N1 block handle up near 1200hp with forged internals

Massive oil cooler on the front, uprated oil system.

Block has the number 24U instead of 5U

Performance: Puts out around 250kw standard.

Theres an article on an N1 in one of the HPI GTR specials. Also if you search for "N1 Block" etc you should find some more info, i lost all the links when i moved over here. I'll have more info after this weekend, bought the bloody thing back in May in Japan and just when it was about to be ready for the road i moved to newcastle, driven it from the wharf and thats it!

Knore: Was searching the auctions at Japan for about 2 months looking for a black v-spec and having no luck, then this N1 pops up, rang up the buyer in japan and asked a few questions about it.

I knew next to nothing about them except that they were a bit beefed up, spent the day searching the net for info, got back to him that arvo and we thought we'd have a bid up to around 50G landed. To be honest we expected to have no chance but i actually got it very cheap (1.7M yen) which equates to around 38-40g on the road registered. So then of course i started worrying about WHY it had gone for that cheap. In the end we think that it was because it just had N1 in the corner of the auction sheet in english and no special mention was made about it.

There's nothing wrong with it, its mechanically sound, 80000km, i strongly doubt its been professionally raced as it has an amp and a big arse sub in the back. Ive heard different numbers regarding production 48, 150 and 500... which is why im keen to find out.

Burto, don't ask another stupid question like this again...

I just spend the evening at the SA library shifting through 7 GT-R reference books, talking to my mate at SA and we are more confused now then before.

Let's start from the very beginning: 1995/01/06 - 1st BCNR33 GT-R, V-Spec and VSpec N1 (5.99Mil Yen) was sold. Then the 1st model revision occured in 1996/01/22 (V-Spec N1, price: same)...then 2nd model revision occured in 1997/02/03(V-Spec N1, price: 5.998Mil Yen)...so how many were sold you ask?...6551 units!

But most of the evening's conversation was spent talking about the BNR32 N1s which were first introduced in 1991/07/19 and sold for 4.305Mil Yen known as the GT-R N1 Race Spec...Nissan printed only 500 units made. When the GT-R had it's 1st minor revision in 1991/08/20, the N1 was still available for sale. Then when the GT-R had it's 2nd minor revision as well as the introduction of the V-Spec in 1993/02/03, the N1 was called V-Spec N1 and initially sold for the same price but a few months later according to these reference books on the 19th of August 1993 the price increased to 5.09Mil Yen due to a full model change! What exactly was different we don't know...but the V-Spec N1 continued to sell at that price when the V-Spec II was introduced in 1994/02/14. So how many N1 were sold...no f**king idea but as far as the true enthusiast are concern the true N1s were the Race Spec ones sold in 1991. Going back Nissan built only 500 Group A Version, but according to SA guys as well as the 5 of 7 reference books...only 228 were built!...perhaps it was 500 allocated cars. Similarly Nismo prints they only made 500 Nismo GT-Rs back in 1990/02/22 but the references print actually 560 were built. Guess we need to ask the people at JAF...and when I get around to it I would like to know how many Group A version were sold/registered to private owners. At 55Mil Yen...yes 55 Million Yen! I can't see too many people outlaying that much money for a fully race ready Group A car...you could built your own 500ps/55kgm GT-R for less. 500 were known to have been built and most I reckon would have been bought by the Racing Teams at the time.

Now don't ask any more silly questions :(

there is not much diff , headlights s1 black , s2 chrome ,s 3 xenon , all h/lights will fit all cars s3 are slightly different at the rear where they bolt on , they dont have the extensions .

Dont think any GTR or GTS-T came with chrome headlights. Only 4 Door R33 Non-Turbo?!?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I know why it happened and I’m embarrassed to say but I was testing the polarity of one of the led bulb to see which side was positive with a 12v battery and that’s when it decided to fry hoping I didn’t damage anything else
    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
×
×
  • Create New...