Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

That is a massive difference.

I think 272s would kill the idle a little too much for my liking.

SK,

Do you think the 260s would be better than the 256/260 for my application? I think I will drop in a set of cams and keep the GT-RSs for now. If it doesn't work out, the cams won't be wasted with smaller turbines anyway.

I have attatched the GTRS graph from the HKS website. I would love to know what has been done to that engine, because it looks like the engine is making 1.8kg boost at about 5000RPM. I guess the Jap fuel helps because you can run heaps of timing on spoolup.

Is the R34 RB26 a bit better than the R33 version? Or is the extra torque on the R34 over the R33 just due to ECU mapping?

The R34 GTT RB25DET Neo has solid followers, so Tomei have 260 degree Poncams for them. The 256's are for the R33 GTST R25DET (non Neo) which has hydraulic followers.

As for the HKS dyno, I have yet to hear of anyone, anywhere in the world that has achieved that result. I don't know what HKS did on the engine dyno, but this is what I would do;

1. Run a highly oxygenated fuel with a high RON, like TurboMax (sold as HKS Drag Fuel in Japan) :idea:

2. Use a water to air intercooler with iced water :aroused:

3. Who cares about detonation, it only has to do one run

4. Don't worry about tuning for daily life, just screw everything up to the max.

5. Use a constant loss water cooling system (not a radiator) and maintain the perfect engine temp

6. No flywheel, alternator or water pump

7. Run the turbo inlet off the dyno room airconditioner outlet, with no restrictions

8. No exhaust, mufflers or restrictive pipe, straight off the tubo dumps into huge vacuum assited ducting

This would give me a "true" result, but hardly what I would call "real world". But maybe I am just more devious than HKS. :rolleyes:

The R34 GTT RB25DET Neo has solid followers, so Tomei have 260 degree Poncams for them.  The 256's are for the R33 GTST R25DET (non Neo) which has hydraulic followers.

As for the HKS dyno, I have yet to hear of anyone, anywhere in the world that has achieved that result.  I don't know what HKS did on the engine dyno, but this is what I would do;

1.  Run a highly oxygenated fuel with a high RON, like TurboMax (sold as HKS Drag Fuel in Japan) :idea:

2. Use a water to air intercooler with iced water :aroused:  

3. Who cares about detonation, it only has to do one run

4. Don't worry about tuning for daily life, just screw everything up to the max.

5. Use a constant loss water cooling system (not a radiator) and maintain the perfect engine temp

6. No flywheel, alternator or water pump

7. Run the turbo inlet off the dyno room airconditioner outlet, with no restrictions

8. No exhaust, mufflers or restrictive pipe, straight off the tubo dumps into huge vacuum assited ducting

This would give me a "true" result, but hardly what I would call "real world".  But maybe I am just more devious than HKS. :rolleyes:

Yeah...I see your point :D

Just a bit of an update, with more road tuning, I now reach 1.3 bar boost by about 5400RPM in third gear. The car feels much better to drive. If cams improve the midrange even slightly, the driveablility will be good enough for me.

The only thing is, I will definately need to fix my AFM issue first.

Mik,

im running standard BNR34 N1 bottom end and BNR34 N1 turbos in my 32. I also have trust 264 9.1mm camshafts and the car is making more power than your car and is making full boost by 4750 rpm. There is something funky going on.

TG

rev210: do you actually know of anyone that can source a C/F prop for an RB26?

LW.

These guys can do one for you.

http://www.ctgltd.co.uk/motorsport.php

Or these guys...(probably better since the Dollar conversion works better for us).

Ask them about a group buy discount.

http://www.acpt.com/

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Have a look at that (shitty) pic I posted. You can see AN -4 braided line coming to a -4 to 1/8 BSPT adapter, into a 1/8 BSPT T piece. The Haltech pressure sender is screwed into the long arm of the sender and factory sender (pre your pic) into the T side. You can also see the cable tie holding the whole contraption in place. Is it better than mounting the sender direct to your engine fitting......yes because it removes that vibration as the engine revs out 50 times every lap and that factory sender is pretty big. Is it necessary for you......well I've got no idea, I just don't like something important failing twice so over-engineer it to the moon!
    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
    • I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
×
×
  • Create New...