Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi guys,

I'm looking to see if my afr's are still ok.  The higher lines are with more boost added.  Is that 12.7:1 too lean for that RPM...i believe that spike is around the 4500-5000rpm mark.

Car runs great.

It's an RB20DET.

Regards,

Scott

Hi Scott, 4,000 rpm actually (at 27 kph per thousand rpm in 4th gear). I aim for 12 to 1 from 3,000 rpm upwards, under that up to 14 to 1 is OK for fuel economy. So I am not sure why it goes so rich at 2,500 rpm. Other than that it looks OK, the power line is certainly smooth enough.:D

Hi Scott, 4,000 rpm actually (at 27 kph per thousand rpm in 4th gear).  I aim for 12 to 1 from 3,000 rpm upwards, under that up to 14 to 1 is OK for fuel economy.  So I am not sure why it goes so rich at 2,500 rpm.  Other than that it looks OK, the power line is certainly smooth enough.:D

So you're saying that the lean spike is at 4000rpm? OK then... (the dyno was done in 3rd as you can tell).

Cameron,

A bit of background info: I have a remapped Toshi (guy off the forums) std ECU and was last remapped for 1 bar. Then i have had it back on the dyno and boost turned up to 1.3 bar.

What boost would be optimum for a GT2530?

So with the ECU the way it is, my A/F is not dangerous? But if i wanna get better fuel economy, it's best that i get it remapped if i plan to run this sort of boost? But how can the graphs be so different before i hit any boost? Can the ECU automatically detect whether the boost has been turned up?

It's a bit confusing to me.

Cheers,

Scott

The dyno printout was all done with the same ECU.

I just added more boost.

Red line = 1.0 bar

Blue line = 1.3 bar

Green line = 1.4 bar

I thought it would have been making more topend power at higher boost. A few months ago i had the car on the same dyno and made 194 rwkw at around 1 bar i believe, but did not match the midrange of my latest dyno (pic) with the 1.3 & 1.4 bar runs (20 rwkw less through midrange but about the same up top).

It's an R32 GTS-T w/ GT2530, FMIC, 3 inch full exhaust, pod filter, and remapped ECU. Everything else standard.

Let me know what you think.

Cheers,

Scott

Sh!te thats very good power for a RB20 i'd be happy with it,

The more boost you run the more air is being forced into the enigne which means more exhaust gasses. The HKS 2530 turbo is good for about 250kw's maby more on a RB25. so maby your top end power you are refering too maby somthing else not the turbo.

The mid range power has increased and some with the top end aswel. mid range is about 25kw's more and top end is about 15kw's more - Which is good.

Are you still running standard fuel pump and injectors ? - They'll need upgrading soon aswel.

Your leaning out spike(little one) isn't too much of a worrie as were it goes up you dont have much speed and rpm up their. For daily driving on hot days dont thrash it on too high of a boost level but at night when its cold high boost (1.4bar) should be fine.

Other than that its a nice smooth power curve.

:D

Jun

"What boost would be optimum for a GT2530?

So with the ECU the way it is, my A/F is not dangerous? But if i wanna get better fuel economy, it's best that i get it remapped if i plan to run this sort of boost? But how can the graphs be so different before i hit any boost? Can the ECU automatically detect whether the boost has been turned up?"

Anyone???

And Cameron, i've got upgraded pump but still standard injectors.

Scott

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I have been being VERY quiet about what you're alluding to, as it is something that ticks me off... The number of cars from factory that run coil overs is HUGE! Most of them these days do... The other part that annoys me, is people saying "Well all the incabin adjustable suspension is illegal by blah blah blah"... If that's the case, then why can I buy a car brand new that can do it if, FULL STOP in cabin adjustable suspension is illegal...   Also, I could just chuck some aftermarket shocks in my car, throw the stock springs on, after my blue slip, dump my super low springs back in. Same shock and spring style setup... Hell, they could also be the same colour springs etc.     I'm voting, BlueSlipper didn't want to touch the above car for some reason. Whether it be some sort of bias against the car, the owner, them maybe having previously done dodgy shit and now they're being super careful in case they get slapped in the face by the Gumbyment again... Find a new blueslip place.   And can confirm as you had said, yes there are holy bibles of vehicle heights, and all sorts of other suspension stuff. Heck your run of the mill mechanic, and tyre shop has access to all of that stuff. It's how they do wheel alignments...
    • Funny story Heading to Sydney this morning on the HWY there was some slow traffic, so I gave it the beans and midway through my overtaking "power run" I lost all power It seems that I missed a hose clamp,  and the MAF and filter went WiFi To make this more problematic, the little tool kit that lives in the boot, is sitting in the sun room at Goulburn......LOL Luckily for me I found a bit of steel on the side of the road that could be used like a rusty and bent flat head screw driver to tighten it up enough that it got me into Sydney, it is now all tight like a tiger with the aid of a 8mm socket Note to self: Use my brain and double check stuff, and always keep that little tool kit in the car for when I have a brain fart
    • Oh, and as for everyone with their fuel economy changes, I switch between E10 and 98 in the company car. Even do when I had personal cars that could run on E10. You know what changed my fuel economy in any noticeable way? How I drove, and where I drove. Otherwise, say on full tanks of just back and forth from work only (So same trips, same sort of traffic), couldn't notice a difference that I can correlate to the type of fuel in use. In the current vehicle, that's over 42L of USABLE fuel. While 98 is all "more energy dense", it also has higher knock resistance as it takes more energy to get it to ignite too. The longer hydrocarbons, typically more tightly bound. So running the same ignition map, can also produce less power, if there isn't enough time to get it all burnt through properly, as yep, the flame propagation speed is different from lower octane fuel to higher (Higher has a lower flame propagation, due to the more tightly bound and harder to self ignite funs. This is also typically where, a vehicle that is designed purely to run on 91 (Whether it be E10 or normal 91) usually sees absolutely no real world difference in fuel economy for the normal man, woman, or dog.
    • We've got some servos around me that have 91 with E10, 91 (no E10), 95, and 98. At those stations the change from 91 E10 to 91, is typically around 8c/L.   But lets not get started on the price of fuel in Oz. It's ridiculous. All the service stations around me, bar one, the price of fuel has been over the $2 mark per litre for the cheapest, 98 being around $2.45. That one service station is a CostCo, fuel from it comes from the same refineries, and makes no pitstops, it runs great, including the 98. In fact, I've had no issues on CostCo fuel, but plenty of issues at other stations!. The CostCo fuel, was $1.65 roughly this week for 94 with E10. $1.88 for 98. Servos directly across from it, $2.10 for 91 E10, and $2.48 for 98. The part I had to laugh at? If I drive multiple HOURS away from Brisbane, say out near Nanango, or Kingaroy, or even out to Goondiwindi, the price of their fuel, is the same as what it is at the CostCo... Oh, and that BP servo at Goondiwindi is HUGE and goes through epic turnover of fuel, so it's not sitting there for weeks going to shit. And what blows me away, my mate is one of the people who drives the Fuel Tanker all around QLD, delivering to all those places. At the same company his previous role was doing the "local haul" deliveries... Same truck, same driver, same pickup point it all comes from. So you tell me, how the hell it is 60c/L CHEAPER for fuel, when nearly all else is equal, except they require a B-Double to drive half a day out of Brisbane, and half a day back, every second day, compared to the delivery that can be under 30 minutes drive from the fuel pickup point... Not to mention, go five blocks down the road, and Ampol to Ampol will vary 30c/L... And I've had this conversation with my mate... The way it's priced, is just typical, pure and utter rubbish... He also does runs from Brisbane, to all over QLD, down to Newcastle, Sydney, Nowra, Melbourne, Geelong, and even out to parts of the NT depending on the companies needs. His main stuff is all the longer distance away from home for a few days at a time, then when he's back, he loves to just pickup extra shifts wherever he can in whichever truck, hence all the weird different places.   Oh, as for getting E10 into all the fuels in Australia... It was very quickly highlighted, that we don't have enough biomass available to use to make E10 sustainably like they require, and it would dramatically cut into our, and the worlds food chain supply...   I vote we all just start running on liquid methane gas... Plenty of that just getting tapped off at tips from underground decay... (Note, this is pure just stupid commenting. I could very easily highlight the reasons its not a good idea especially on scale...)
    • Am I correct in assuming that the R35's are getting the classic skyline haircut off the odometer?  Quick search on carsales, there are 33 08 and 09 GTR's for sale, only 2 of them have more then 100,000km's on them (116,075 and 110,000 respectively).  And somehow there are about 25 for sale with around 60,000kms? Looks like the classic skyline haircut to me =/
×
×
  • Create New...