Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi guys,

I'm looking to see if my afr's are still ok.  The higher lines are with more boost added.  Is that 12.7:1 too lean for that RPM...i believe that spike is around the 4500-5000rpm mark.

Car runs great.

It's an RB20DET.

Regards,

Scott

Hi Scott, 4,000 rpm actually (at 27 kph per thousand rpm in 4th gear). I aim for 12 to 1 from 3,000 rpm upwards, under that up to 14 to 1 is OK for fuel economy. So I am not sure why it goes so rich at 2,500 rpm. Other than that it looks OK, the power line is certainly smooth enough.:D

Hi Scott, 4,000 rpm actually (at 27 kph per thousand rpm in 4th gear).  I aim for 12 to 1 from 3,000 rpm upwards, under that up to 14 to 1 is OK for fuel economy.  So I am not sure why it goes so rich at 2,500 rpm.  Other than that it looks OK, the power line is certainly smooth enough.:D

So you're saying that the lean spike is at 4000rpm? OK then... (the dyno was done in 3rd as you can tell).

Cameron,

A bit of background info: I have a remapped Toshi (guy off the forums) std ECU and was last remapped for 1 bar. Then i have had it back on the dyno and boost turned up to 1.3 bar.

What boost would be optimum for a GT2530?

So with the ECU the way it is, my A/F is not dangerous? But if i wanna get better fuel economy, it's best that i get it remapped if i plan to run this sort of boost? But how can the graphs be so different before i hit any boost? Can the ECU automatically detect whether the boost has been turned up?

It's a bit confusing to me.

Cheers,

Scott

The dyno printout was all done with the same ECU.

I just added more boost.

Red line = 1.0 bar

Blue line = 1.3 bar

Green line = 1.4 bar

I thought it would have been making more topend power at higher boost. A few months ago i had the car on the same dyno and made 194 rwkw at around 1 bar i believe, but did not match the midrange of my latest dyno (pic) with the 1.3 & 1.4 bar runs (20 rwkw less through midrange but about the same up top).

It's an R32 GTS-T w/ GT2530, FMIC, 3 inch full exhaust, pod filter, and remapped ECU. Everything else standard.

Let me know what you think.

Cheers,

Scott

Sh!te thats very good power for a RB20 i'd be happy with it,

The more boost you run the more air is being forced into the enigne which means more exhaust gasses. The HKS 2530 turbo is good for about 250kw's maby more on a RB25. so maby your top end power you are refering too maby somthing else not the turbo.

The mid range power has increased and some with the top end aswel. mid range is about 25kw's more and top end is about 15kw's more - Which is good.

Are you still running standard fuel pump and injectors ? - They'll need upgrading soon aswel.

Your leaning out spike(little one) isn't too much of a worrie as were it goes up you dont have much speed and rpm up their. For daily driving on hot days dont thrash it on too high of a boost level but at night when its cold high boost (1.4bar) should be fine.

Other than that its a nice smooth power curve.

:D

Jun

"What boost would be optimum for a GT2530?

So with the ECU the way it is, my A/F is not dangerous? But if i wanna get better fuel economy, it's best that i get it remapped if i plan to run this sort of boost? But how can the graphs be so different before i hit any boost? Can the ECU automatically detect whether the boost has been turned up?"

Anyone???

And Cameron, i've got upgraded pump but still standard injectors.

Scott

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • perhaps i should have mentioned, I plugged the unit in before i handed over to the electronics repair shop to see what damaged had been caused and the unit worked (ac controls, rear demister etc) bar the lights behind the lcd. i would assume that the diode was only to control lighting and didnt harm anything else i got the unit back from the electronics repair shop and all is well (to a point). The lights are back on and ac controls are working. im still paranoid as i beleive the repairer just put in any zener diode he could find and admitted asking chatgpt if its compatible   i do however have another issue... sometimes when i turn the ignition on, the climate control unit now goes through a diagnostics procedure which normally occurs when you disconnect and reconnect but this may be due to the below   to top everything off, and feel free to shoot me as im just about to do it myself anyway, while i was checking the newly repaired board by plugging in the climate control unit bare without the housing, i believe i may have shorted it on the headunit surround. Climate control unit still works but now the keyless entry doesnt work along with the dome light not turning on when you open the door. to add to this tricky situation, when you start the car and remove the key ( i have a turbo timer so car remains on) the keyless entry works. the dome light also works when you switch to the on position. fuses were checked and all ok ive deduced that the short somehow has messed with the smart entry control module as that is what controls the keyless entry and dome light on door opening   you guys wouldnt happen to have any experience with that topic lmao... im only laughing as its all i can do right now my self diagnosed adhd always gets me in a situation as i have no patience and want to get everything done in shortest amount of time as possible often ignoring crucial steps such as disconnecting battery when stuffing around with electronics or even placing a simple rag over the metallic headunit surround when placing a live pcb board on top of it   FML
    • Bit of a pity we don't have good images of the back/front of the PCB ~ that said, I found a YT vid of a teardown to replace dicky clock switches, and got enough of a glimpse to realize this PCB is the front-end to a connected to what I'll call PCBA, and as such this is all digital on this PCB..ergo, battery voltage probably doesn't make an appearance here ; that is, I'd expect them to do something on PCBA wrt power conditioning for the adjustment/display/switch PCB.... ....given what's transpired..ie; some permutation of 12vdc on a 5vdc with or without correct polarity...would explain why the zener said "no" and exploded. The transistor Q5 (M33) is likely to be a digital switching transistor...that is, package has builtin bias resistors to ensure it saturates as soon as base threshold voltage is reached (minimal rise/fall time)....and wrt the question 'what else could've fried?' ....well, I know there's an MCU on this board (display, I/O at a guess), and you hope they isolated it from this scenario...I got my crayons out, it looks a bit like this...   ...not a lot to see, or rather, everything you'd like to see disappears down a via to the other side...base drive for the transistor comes from somewhere else, what this transistor is switching is somewhere else...but the zener circuit is exclusive to all this ~ it's providing a set voltage (current limited by the 1K3 resistor R19)...and disappears somewhere else down the via I marked V out ; if the errant voltage 'jumped' the diode in the millisecond before it exploded, whatever that V out via feeds may have seen a spike... ....I'll just imagine that Q5 was switched off at the time, thus no damage should've been done....but whatever that zener feeds has to be checked... HTH
    • I think Fitmit had some, have a look on there (theyre Australian as well)
    • Hah, fair enough! But if you learn with this one you can drive any other OEM manual. No modern luxury features like auto rev-matching or hillstart assist to give you a false sense of confidence. And a heavy car with not that much torque so it stalls easily. 
×
×
  • Create New...