Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

:confused:

I was told today that to this day, 13 years later after the R32 GTR ran Bathurst, their record time still stands!

Up to the most recent 2004 race with the big V8's 5.7?? litre and the technology (if you can call it that) Holdens and Ford have, they still are behind by 30 minutes??

I was told this today. Can anyone confirm this? If so, its pretty amazing stuff.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/55213-did-you-know/
Share on other sites

:confused:  

I was told today that to this day, 13 years later after the R32 GTR ran Bathurst, their record time still stands!

Up to the most recent 2004 race with the big V8's 5.7?? litre and the technology (if you can call it that) Holdens and Ford have, they still are behind by 30 minutes??  

I was told this today. Can anyone confirm this? If so, its pretty amazing stuff.

The V8s in the ford and the holden are 5 litres, and I think it is because they track was changed slightly, but other than that yeah... GTahhhhh

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/55213-did-you-know/#findComment-1077353
Share on other sites

I don't think so, I heard the GTR lap record was broken about 5-6 years later on the same track, still damm impresive though!

P.S I heard this from my mates, sisters, cousin's, friends former room-mate

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/55213-did-you-know/#findComment-1077364
Share on other sites

Lap time was broken. But that is pretty much expected cause of new tyre technology, not just engine alone.

That record in reference is the time for race distance. There are so much variables that can affect this, like weather, how many times pace car comes out, etc...

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/55213-did-you-know/#findComment-1077410
Share on other sites

LOL, GTR lap time has been demolished by V8s, but as Silver says, overall race time still strands as a record, but pace cars etc play a huge part. I think if you look at the average race lap time around Bathurst in the V8s, given an accident free race (as if:)) they are quicker.

LOL...all this talk about 13yr old GTR lap recordes being quicker then todays tourers...how many ppl have forgetten that the R32 GTR was beaten by a VL Walkinshaw:)

....sh1t stir:)

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/55213-did-you-know/#findComment-1077425
Share on other sites

The XY Falcs (& the E49s) were beaten by Brocky in an LJ GTR XU-1.

I remember the Percy and Gricey win! Quite funny I though at the time. But with any race that long it takes luck as well as a good team/car/driver.

PS beer is better than apples or oranges

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/55213-did-you-know/#findComment-1077989
Share on other sites

Of all cars, a VL beat the mighty R32 GTR Godzilla:)

Stir the pot.:D

I'm glad to see that someone knows that the only GODZILLAS were the 32 GTR Bathurst. Or at least I hope. I'm sick of all these people who drive GTR's and claim that they are a GODZILLA. Baby Godzilla is their real term.

My hail to the walky for she is a sweet vessel.

Hail Walky Hail.

My hail to all V8's coz they put up such a good fight...lol

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/55213-did-you-know/#findComment-1081091
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Have a look at that (shitty) pic I posted. You can see AN -4 braided line coming to a -4 to 1/8 BSPT adapter, into a 1/8 BSPT T piece. The Haltech pressure sender is screwed into the long arm of the sender and factory sender (pre your pic) into the T side. You can also see the cable tie holding the whole contraption in place. Is it better than mounting the sender direct to your engine fitting......yes because it removes that vibration as the engine revs out 50 times every lap and that factory sender is pretty big. Is it necessary for you......well I've got no idea, I just don't like something important failing twice so over-engineer it to the moon!
    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
    • I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
×
×
  • Create New...