Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 85
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

i hope so! i think it all bolts up.  Kit comes with its own dump and all the lines. I think the one thing ill need is a new intake pipe as the compressor inlet mouth looks big, but im fairly sure its a blot on kit.

can someone with ~280rwkw comment on drivability? are these cars still fast at speeds below 100 or is it just wheelspin city?

While i love power, it makes you slower if you cant get it down!

Its very rare that on normal roads you open the car out to 7000rpm in every gear.

With the price of petrol these days i much prefer driving my gfriends car around day to day

300kw's is my power goal eventually also. Sounds like an awesome whack of power.,. As for bolt on turbo i have witnessed some TD06's on rb25's and they go well. IO have been in a r33 which had a HKS 3037s and microtech and cams etc and it made 350hp at wheels on 1 bar. Was rather quick but very wheelspiny. guess its personal choice on turbos.

Would it be a better idea if i was to say put garret gt2535 on my car rb25det,with usual mods,with a different size ar.Here is a reply that i got from horsepower in a box.com

I can do the GT2535 in the T3 flange internal gated for $1750, but not the

GT2530.

We also do a 500hp core unit with a .70 comp cover for the RB25 as a bolt on

Internal gate for $2150.

Regards

Is this option a good one for this turbo and motor with stock internals looking at running cams?What sort of spooling rpm time could i expect it to come onto boost from the upgraded version?

:)

For me i feel 250RWKW is perfect for the street/circuit. Only problem is finding a turbo that will hit full boost at a low rpm(say 3500-4000) and make that amount of power as well, Because we all know bigger turbos=big power=lots of lag. I think to achieve 250RWKW with a little lag(compared with stock) you'd need cams, ported head and port matched inlet and exhaust ports. All these help reduce the lag and up the power too. In my opinion ball bearing and being water and oil cooled is a must for the longterm, plus the ball bearing aspect helps in cutting lag.

Would it be a better idea if i was to say put garret gt2535 on my car rb25det,with usual mods,with a different size ar.Here is a reply that i got from horsepower in a box.com

I can do the GT2535 in the T3 flange internal gated for $1750, but not the

GT2530.

We also do a 500hp core unit with a .70 comp cover for the RB25 as a bolt on

Internal gate for $2150.

Regards

Is this option a good one for this turbo and motor with stock internals looking at running cams?What sort of spooling rpm time could i expect it to come onto boost from the upgraded version?

:D

Only probelm with these type of turbos is that you will always have boost control problems and sureg problems when trying to pump out alot of hp from a internal gated turbo!!

Only probelm with these type of turbos is that you will always have boost control problems and sureg problems when trying to pump out alot of hp from a internal gated turbo!!

is the reason being that in order to control boost pressure on a big turbo, an internal gate wont allow enough gas out to make the boost change needed?

From Grepins Thread, posted by SK regarding the GT2835proS

Hi grepin, I like it, it has....

270 rwkw at 7,300 rpm

277 rwkw at 6,300 rpm

246 rwkw at 5,300 rpm

210 rwkw at 4,300 rpm

That's an average of 251 rwkw over the useable rpm allowing for gearchanges. There are plenty of cars with over 300 rwkw that don't average 251 rwkw.

I think it would be a nice car to drive, fast and progressive.

BTW guys, notice this dyno run was not in Shoot Out Mode, so no ambient air temperature compensation. If it was a 31 degree day, then on a 19 degree day it's gunna make a smidge over 300 rwkw with an average around 270 rwkw.

Wanna guess what the A/F ratios would be then? In my opinion Mick has done a good job, looks to be both safe and powerful, you don't see that everyday.

As I said at the start, I like it!

trust33, bear in mind that Garret GT25 series are not the same as HKS GT25 series. for example to duplicate the ~250rwkw from a HKS GT2535 int gate youd need a Garret GT3040 int gate.

All because of the different compressor and turbine blade designs?

I have read that on sdu forums by mariogtr that whatever turbo i use the hks will allways flow closer to its full potential than a garret equivilent.He says somewere in the vicinity of 20hp is what you should take off of a garret turbos rating and it would give a better indication of what this turbo will pull.

Also being that all of these turbos are rated at stock boost 10psi or so.So there will be room for more power.

I say,now being that a stock rb25det turbo is rated at 250ps and has smaller .ar housings and includes ceramic bladed turbine,non ball bearing turbo and being able to see the power they can produce when pushed,that a garret or hks turbo with a better ps output to start will surely make arround 380-400 ps of what i am after.The only difference being that HKS will make it there easier.

If going an underrated turbo what are my chances of being able to elliminate/minimise lag and be able to come onto boost by 3500-3800 and still be able to make the desired 380-400hp/ps output int gate and run minimal boost?

Hks would be good but to be able to afford a brand new one i would have to buy from os.Have you seen hks-T au prices!meh..

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Yeah, that's fine**. But the numbers you came up with are just wrong. Try it for yourself. Put in any voltage from the possible range and see what result you get. You get nonsense. ** When I say "fine", I mean, it's still shit. The very simple linear formula (slope & intercept) is shit for a sensor with a non-linear response. This is the curve, from your data above. Look at the CURVE! It's only really linear between about 30 and 90 °C. And if you used only that range to define a curve, it would be great. But you would go more and more wrong as you went to higher temps. And that is why the slope & intercept found when you use 50 and 150 as the end points is so bad halfway between those points. The real curve is a long way below the linear curve which just zips straight between the end points, like this one. You could probably use the same slope and a lower intercept, to move that straight line down, and spread the error out. But you would 5-10°C off in a lot of places. You'd need to say what temperature range you really wanted to be most right - say, 100 to 130, and plop the line closest to teh real curve in that region, which would make it quite wrong down at the lower temperatures. Let me just say that HPTuners are not being realistic in only allowing for a simple linear curve. 
    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
    • Nah, that is hella wrong. If I do a simple linear between 150°C (0.407v) and 50°C (2.98v) I get the formula Temperature = -38.8651*voltage + 165.8181 It is perfectly correct at 50 and 150, but it is as much as 20° out in the region of 110°C, because the actual data is significantly non-linear there. It is no more than 4° out down at the lowest temperatures, but is is seriously shit almost everywhere. I cannot believe that the instruction is to do a 2 point linear fit. I would say the method I used previously would have to be better.
×
×
  • Create New...