Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

been all over the shop getting quotes for fitting my intercooler (gtr on gts-t)

The mob ive just talked to said, the gtr cooler will work awesomely, but he wants to mod the plenum and move the throttle body to reduce piping

is this a good idea? the guy said he would use a curved section up to the front of the plenum

i like the sound of reduce piping, but have heard stories about custom plenums being dodgy and not flowing air to all cylinders

whats the go with that?

is there anyway we can test that all cylinders do get a propper air flow with the custom plenum?

is this the best way to install an intercooler?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/55371-intercooler-install-modifying-plenum/
Share on other sites

Need a little more information on the "curved section up to the front of the plenum" bit. I know a few guys who have seen good numbers from fabricating a custom can on top of the standard RB25 bottom runners. G-Reddy of course make a plenum, plus a heap of major places here in Oz.

Do they flow evenly to all cylinders? A flow bench is used to check this often when being thought about, but I could imagine a lot of ones wouldn’t ... otherwise I guess the detonation threshold of the lowest common dominator, would be the point where the "limit" is reached.

If you were going to hang onto the car and start making serious power, the custom top half would be a good start for me I reckon!

... but just ma pinion.. =)

Think had about how much pipe length you will save, is it really woth it. There is a pressure loss of about 25 Pa (N/m2) (0.0036 Psi OR 0.00025 Bar) in 1m length of 65mm (2.5inch pipe) really, is it worth all the effort. The maths to work out that pressure loss is at the bottom of the post.

Also,

The factory plenum and inet runners were designed that way for a reason, very close to symmetrical flow with equal length runners, ie equal air flow to all cylinders so fuel trimming is not required.

Personally, I do not like the design of most aftermarket inlet manifolds, sure some flow better but pressure drop between cylinders can be significantly different resulting in different air flow and screwed up fuel trimming (some cylinders running rich, some lean - makes it very hard to tune). If you want to do it properly your are going to need a management system that allows fuel trimming, eg, Motec, (can't comment on PFC, Wolf etc.. never had experience).

My advice, leave the factory manifold unless you want really big power numbers, save the money,

Here is the maths to work that pressure loss;

Air at 60 oC flowing in a 1 m galvanized duct - 65 mm diameter - with velocity 15 m/s. (All guesses at a typical operating condition)

Reynolds number Re = dh v ρ / μ

where

v = velocity

ρ = density

μ = dynamic or absolute viscosity

Re = ( 1 kg/m3 15 m/s 0.065 m ) / 2 x 10-5 Ns/m2 = 48750 (kgm/s2)/N ~ Turbulent flow

Using Moody Diagram - the friction coefficient - λ - is:

λ = 0,015

The major loss - Darcy-Weisbach Equation

hloss = λ ( l / dh ) ( ρ v^2 / 2 )

= 0,015 (1 m / 0,065 m) ( 1 kg/m3 (15 m/s)^2 / 2 )

= 25 Pa (N/m2)

= 0.0036 Psi

= 0.00025 Bar

So with a whole extra meter of intercooler piping you would see 6.9964 Psi instead of 7 Psi at the manifold.

That formula is for a "straight" piece of pipe yeah?

Not taking into account the extra bends involved or the fact your still running over

the top of the motor(heatsoak).

What about how long it takes to fill that extra volume.

Not knocking you just asking a question.

the plenum i have on mine is a custom top half.

i leaned out the a/f ratio on my rb25 and held it flat and finally blew at 260km/hr

interestingly enough the cylinders that went were 3 and 4 not the end ones like everyone thinks

"Just" is right the calc is for straight pipe, I was more just pointing out that there is dick all pressure loss in uniform pipe with that diameter at that velocity. You can work out the minor losses (ie losses from bends, valves (throttle) etc..) with the eqn below.

All just an excuse to use those old uni books.

ploss = ξ 1/2 ρ v^2

where

ξ = minor loss coefficient

ploss = pressure loss (Pa (N/m^2)

ρ = density (kg/m^3)

v = flow velocity (m/s)

hloss = head loss (m)

g = acceleration of gravity (m/s^2)

Typical values of minor loss coefficient

Flanged Regular 90 deg Elbows ξ = 0.3

Threaded Regular 90 deg Elbows ξ = 1.5

Threaded Regular 45 deg Elbows ξ = 0.4

Flanged Long Radius 90 deg Elbows ξ = 0.2

Threaded Long Radius 90 deg Elbows ξ = 0.7

Flanged Long Radius 45 deg Elbows ξ = 0.2

I pulled most of this stuff off http://www.engineeringtoolbox.com - really usefull sight.

If you want to do it properly your are going to need a management system that allows fuel trimming, eg, Motec, (can't comment on PFC, Wolf etc.. never had experience).

Power FC's have individual cylinder trim for the injectors.:)

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Have a look at that (shitty) pic I posted. You can see AN -4 braided line coming to a -4 to 1/8 BSPT adapter, into a 1/8 BSPT T piece. The Haltech pressure sender is screwed into the long arm of the sender and factory sender (pre your pic) into the T side. You can also see the cable tie holding the whole contraption in place. Is it better than mounting the sender direct to your engine fitting......yes because it removes that vibration as the engine revs out 50 times every lap and that factory sender is pretty big. Is it necessary for you......well I've got no idea, I just don't like something important failing twice so over-engineer it to the moon!
    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
    • I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
×
×
  • Create New...