Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

been all over the shop getting quotes for fitting my intercooler (gtr on gts-t)

The mob ive just talked to said, the gtr cooler will work awesomely, but he wants to mod the plenum and move the throttle body to reduce piping

is this a good idea? the guy said he would use a curved section up to the front of the plenum

i like the sound of reduce piping, but have heard stories about custom plenums being dodgy and not flowing air to all cylinders

whats the go with that?

is there anyway we can test that all cylinders do get a propper air flow with the custom plenum?

is this the best way to install an intercooler?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/55371-intercooler-install-modifying-plenum/
Share on other sites

Need a little more information on the "curved section up to the front of the plenum" bit. I know a few guys who have seen good numbers from fabricating a custom can on top of the standard RB25 bottom runners. G-Reddy of course make a plenum, plus a heap of major places here in Oz.

Do they flow evenly to all cylinders? A flow bench is used to check this often when being thought about, but I could imagine a lot of ones wouldn’t ... otherwise I guess the detonation threshold of the lowest common dominator, would be the point where the "limit" is reached.

If you were going to hang onto the car and start making serious power, the custom top half would be a good start for me I reckon!

... but just ma pinion.. =)

Think had about how much pipe length you will save, is it really woth it. There is a pressure loss of about 25 Pa (N/m2) (0.0036 Psi OR 0.00025 Bar) in 1m length of 65mm (2.5inch pipe) really, is it worth all the effort. The maths to work out that pressure loss is at the bottom of the post.

Also,

The factory plenum and inet runners were designed that way for a reason, very close to symmetrical flow with equal length runners, ie equal air flow to all cylinders so fuel trimming is not required.

Personally, I do not like the design of most aftermarket inlet manifolds, sure some flow better but pressure drop between cylinders can be significantly different resulting in different air flow and screwed up fuel trimming (some cylinders running rich, some lean - makes it very hard to tune). If you want to do it properly your are going to need a management system that allows fuel trimming, eg, Motec, (can't comment on PFC, Wolf etc.. never had experience).

My advice, leave the factory manifold unless you want really big power numbers, save the money,

Here is the maths to work that pressure loss;

Air at 60 oC flowing in a 1 m galvanized duct - 65 mm diameter - with velocity 15 m/s. (All guesses at a typical operating condition)

Reynolds number Re = dh v ρ / μ

where

v = velocity

ρ = density

μ = dynamic or absolute viscosity

Re = ( 1 kg/m3 15 m/s 0.065 m ) / 2 x 10-5 Ns/m2 = 48750 (kgm/s2)/N ~ Turbulent flow

Using Moody Diagram - the friction coefficient - λ - is:

λ = 0,015

The major loss - Darcy-Weisbach Equation

hloss = λ ( l / dh ) ( ρ v^2 / 2 )

= 0,015 (1 m / 0,065 m) ( 1 kg/m3 (15 m/s)^2 / 2 )

= 25 Pa (N/m2)

= 0.0036 Psi

= 0.00025 Bar

So with a whole extra meter of intercooler piping you would see 6.9964 Psi instead of 7 Psi at the manifold.

That formula is for a "straight" piece of pipe yeah?

Not taking into account the extra bends involved or the fact your still running over

the top of the motor(heatsoak).

What about how long it takes to fill that extra volume.

Not knocking you just asking a question.

the plenum i have on mine is a custom top half.

i leaned out the a/f ratio on my rb25 and held it flat and finally blew at 260km/hr

interestingly enough the cylinders that went were 3 and 4 not the end ones like everyone thinks

"Just" is right the calc is for straight pipe, I was more just pointing out that there is dick all pressure loss in uniform pipe with that diameter at that velocity. You can work out the minor losses (ie losses from bends, valves (throttle) etc..) with the eqn below.

All just an excuse to use those old uni books.

ploss = ξ 1/2 ρ v^2

where

ξ = minor loss coefficient

ploss = pressure loss (Pa (N/m^2)

ρ = density (kg/m^3)

v = flow velocity (m/s)

hloss = head loss (m)

g = acceleration of gravity (m/s^2)

Typical values of minor loss coefficient

Flanged Regular 90 deg Elbows ξ = 0.3

Threaded Regular 90 deg Elbows ξ = 1.5

Threaded Regular 45 deg Elbows ξ = 0.4

Flanged Long Radius 90 deg Elbows ξ = 0.2

Threaded Long Radius 90 deg Elbows ξ = 0.7

Flanged Long Radius 45 deg Elbows ξ = 0.2

I pulled most of this stuff off http://www.engineeringtoolbox.com - really usefull sight.

If you want to do it properly your are going to need a management system that allows fuel trimming, eg, Motec, (can't comment on PFC, Wolf etc.. never had experience).

Power FC's have individual cylinder trim for the injectors.:)

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Just trying to get my head around this. At 5psi of boost, you turn on your wmi pump, and then you're using a 3000cc injector, to allow flow upto the actual engine, where you have your 6x200cc injectors and a 500cc injector. If the above is correct, what advantage are you obtaining by having the 3000cc injector blocking flow, is this just incase a line breaks between that injector and the motor you can stop flow immediately? Or are the 6x200cc and 500cc less injectors and just spray nozzle?
    • Welcome! New member myself, but I had an R33 back in 2002. Best advice I could give, based on my experience: if you're running the factory turbo, be very conservative with boost. I made the mistake of just fiddling around with the boost controller and cranking the boost for fun, and the end result was my intake pipes popping off frequently from the constant deluge of oil that was being blown into the recirc by the stressed-out turbo, which itself was siphoning oil from the engine and farting it out both sides of its centre bearing (or something to that effect). If I could do it all again, I would have gotten a new turbo and had a tune dialled in professionally and then just left it alone! Funny you mention the metal shavings in the gearbox, as I had the same thing - the probe plug (magnetic drain plug, essentially) would come out caked with shavings. At least it was doing its job. Not sure if that's just sacrificial wear and part of the deal, or if my gearbox was shagged, but I wasn't abusing it. Enjoy the R33 - they're a dying breed, and if they weren't $35k+ on CarSales in Queensland, I might have picked up one of those again, instead of the 370GT I own now (though I'm loving the 370GT, that big 3.7L V6 just hits different).
    • Howdy folks. I owned an R33 back in 2002, which was thoroughly beyond my capacity (financially speaking) to maintain/insure, so we parted ways in 2004. Fast forward 21 years (to literally yesterday, in fact) and I'm now the proud owner of a 2007 V36 370GT. I'm happily surprised by how much power the VQ37VHR makes, compared to the RB25DET, considering the latter is turbocharged. I had planned to add a turbo at some point but I'm on the fence about whether I'll even need it (though I do love the sudden onset of extra torque). Any other 370GT owners around the traps, I'd love to hear about your experiences with this car (good and bad).
    • Perhaps the answer is... more jacks!* *proper jacks must be used.  
    • I NEVER think about using a scissor jack unless there is absolutely no other alternative. f**king things are dangerous, annoying and stupid.
×
×
  • Create New...