Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Heard random comments about pod filters being illegal,

Has any actually got defected for having a pod?

Why the duck would they be illegal?

Even heard that you can only have a FMIC if your pod is inclosed in an airbox WTF?!?! I sure this is crap, but any informed advice would be very much appreciated.

Sometimes doing a search gets you lost, I started looking for a thread on this and instead I found the roil oil treatment threads..... damm...... two hous later i'm finally back to asking:

What is the deal with pod filters???????.

Thanks.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/55521-pod-filters-illegal-or-what/
Share on other sites

Dono bout QLD but an engineer told me he'd engineer my pod without a box.

I said i thought i was under the impression if it ain't in a box it's a fire risk or something.

He said as long as it's cotton it's ok in that regard (so no oiled K&Ns) but he said the cops use some bullshit ADR or EPA reg (can't remember which he said) about noise. Basically the defect is that the pod makes the induction loud. He said realistically it's mostly only applicable to rotory engines.

But still I'll be getting my pod engineered, and if i wasn't i'd be getting a box so there is no chance of a defect because if a cop wants to they will.

Again - not sure bout QLD.

in victoria, epa rules state only 1 intake mod (is the epa a state authority or a federal auth?)

Ie you can't have a FMIC and an unboxed pod filter.

the reason they do this, is because too many intake mods will affect the emmisions control systems. (eg if you add an intercooler the air will be cooler and more dense than the computer thinks it is)

in vic - unboxed pod filters are ok, provided they are unoiled and provided it's an EFI car.

in victoria, epa rules state only 1 intake mod  

Ie  you can't have a FMIC and an unboxed pod filter.

No soup for you!

If the car has a factory fmic, you can intall an aftermarket filter.

Factory fittings aren't modifications.

factory cooler + aftermarket filter = 1 x modification.

in nsw u are only allowed 1 other form of induction modification, if u have an unboxed pod then a fmic is a defect, u can get defected for an unboxed pod, which is $75 and they will most likely make u do an emissions test as well

i have been defected for the pod so thats what the penalty was for me, to resolve it i got a cai box from UAS to hide it, but it also gained me about 6rwkw and now legally im allowed to have my fmic...

hope that helps...ben.

in nsw u are only allowed 1 other form of induction modification, if u have an unboxed pod then a fmic is a defect

er... going back to what I said before, if you have a factory cooler, then it's not an induction modification, it's a part of the standard factory induction system.

An aftermarket filter is a modification.

A factory cooler is not a modification.

:bonk:

ok yes ur right but im talkin about a front mount aftermarket intercooler...not many cars i know of apart from the gtr and evo have standard fmic...

so therefore if u have an aftermarket fmic then thats a defect unless ur pod is enclosed, thats the reason now why im legally allowed to have my FMIC coz i got the pod boxed.

ben...

No soup for you!

If the car has a factory fmic, you can intall an aftermarket filter.

Factory fittings aren't modifications.

factory cooler + aftermarket filter = 1 x modification.

oops, that's what i meant! aftermarket FMIC

check this link out:

http://members.austarmetro.com.au/~toan/EPAData/

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I mean, I got two VASS engineers to refuse to cert my own coilovers stating those very laws. Appendix B makes it pretty clear what it considers 'Variable Suspension' to be. In my lived experience they can't certify something that isn't actually in the list as something that requires certification. In the VASS engineering checklist they have to complete (LS3/NCOP11) and sign on there is nothing there. All the references inside NCOP11 state that if it's variable by the driver that height needs to maintain 100mm while the car is in motion. It states the car is lowered lowering blocks and other types of things are acceptable. Dialling out a shock is about as 'user adjustable' as changing any other suspension component lol. I wanted to have it signed off to dissuade HWP and RWC testers to state the suspension is legal to avoid having this discussion with them. The real problem is that Police and RWC/Pink/Blue slip people will say it needs engineering, and the engineers will state it doesn't need engineering. It is hugely irritating when aforementioned people get all "i know the rules mate feck off" when they don't, and the actual engineers are pleasant as all hell and do know the rules. Cars failing RWC for things that aren't listed in the RWC requirements is another thing here entirely!
    • I don't. I mean, mine's not a GTR, but it is a 32 with a lot of GTR stuff on it. But regardless, I typically buy from local suppliers. Getting stuff from Japan is seldom worth the pain. Buying from RHDJapan usually ends up in the final total of your basket being about double what you thought it would be, after all the bullshit fees and such are added on.
    • The hydrocarbon component of E10 can be shittier, and is in fact, shittier, than that used in normal 91RON fuel. That's because the octane boost provided by the ethanol allows them to use stuff that doesn't make the grade without the help. The 1c/L saving typically available on E10 is going to be massively overridden by the increased consumption caused by the ethanol and the crappier HC (ie the HCs will be less dense, meaning that there will definitely be less energy per unit volume than for more dense HCs). That is one of the reasons why P98 will return better fuel consumption than 91 does, even with the ignition timing completely fixed. There is more energy per unit volume because the HCs used in 98 are higher density than in the lawnmower fuel.
    • No, I'd suggest that that is the checklist for pneumatic/hydraulic adjustable systems. I would say, based on my years of reading and complying with Australian Standards and similar regulations, that the narrow interpretation of Clause 3.2 b would be the preferred/expected/intended one, by the author, and those using the standard. Wishful thinking need not apply.
    • Yes they do. For some maybe. But for those used the most by abusers, ie Skylines, the numbers are known. The stock eyebrow height for R32/3 Skylines is about 365/375mm or thereabouts. The minimum such heights are recorded in adjacent columns in the database.
×
×
  • Create New...