Jump to content
SAU Community

Power vs torque


Recommended Posts

Guest mightymax

I cannot figure this out maybe some fellow forum members can help me out.... :)

What influences power and torque?

1.)For example running increases stamina/endurance while wieght lifting increases strength for human...

For cars what mods increase power or torque???

OR

2.)Is it dependent on the nature and characteristics of the ECU?e.g.power fc vs possumlink

OR

3.)Can the tuner trade off power and torque?

Foe example:car A: 100kw(power) and 50nm(torque)

car B: 50kw and 100nm(torque)

Which car would have a advantage on a flat surface and a steep slope?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/5553-power-vs-torque/
Share on other sites

Torque is a twisting force, just the same as you would apply with a spanner to do up a nut.

Fifty foot pounds of torque is like a fifty pound weight on the end of a one foot spanner. Or five pounds of force on the end of a ten foot spanner.

This is simply a force pushing, pulling or twisting on something.

Power is the rate of work being done, or force times speed. If you do something twice as fast, it requires twice the power.

So, power equals torque times speed. expressed Ft-lb x RPM.

A long time ago a guy calld James Watt got himself a genuine hairy horse, and did some measurements to see how much weight his horse could lift or drag in a certain time.

He decided that his horse could lift a 550 pound weight one foot each second, and this has now become the standard unit of horsepower. True !

We now have the formula , Horsepower = Ft-lb x RPM / 5252

Getting back to internal combustion engines, torque is twisting force only. The main factor deciding torque for a non supercharged engine, is the size of the engine, that is the bore, stroke, and number of cylinders.

Power for a heat engine is the rate at which air and fuel can be burnt in a given time. So power has more to do with airflow through the engine than the size of the engine.

I small high reving motorcycle engine can make a lot of power because it can spin so fast, but will not have a lot of torque because it is small.

A huge truck engine will make a lot of torque because it is big. But because it cannot spin fast the power will be relatively low.

A gearbox can reduce the speed of a shaft and increase the torque at the same time, but the power remains almost exactly the same.

So a one hundred horsepower motorcycle engine fed through a reduction gearbox can produce the same torque and RPM as you would get straight from the one hundred horsepower truck engine.

Does that help ?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/5553-power-vs-torque/#findComment-84273
Share on other sites

Okay - easiest way to get more torque is to increase capacity. Now how do you do that on a motor? Increase the boost.

If you want more power, you play with your mixtures, let the motor breathe better, etc etc...

matt

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/5553-power-vs-torque/#findComment-84666
Share on other sites

Power=Torque*RPM*a constant

If you make good torque at high RPM you make good power, and can take better advantage of gearing.

My last car was a Civic VTiR, which had bugger all torque, but peak torque was over 6000RPM, leading to peak power of 118kw at 7200rpm.

I am driving a 3L diesel lowlux hire car at the moment, which has heaps of low torque but this drops off well below the 4500 redline:uh-huh: . It can accel up a steep hill in fourth at 1700 rpm, but would do a 0-100 in 15 seconds.

Power is all about where your torque is in the RPM range.

As an aside dynos don't measure power they measure torque and calculate power from this and tyre rpm or tacho rpm.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/5553-power-vs-torque/#findComment-84709
Share on other sites

Originally posted by b2barker

As an aside dynos don't measure power they measure torque and calculate power from this and tyre rpm or tacho rpm.

Exactly! I'm glad someone pointed this out.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/5553-power-vs-torque/#findComment-85260
Share on other sites

Originally posted by Warpspeed

Torque = acceleration, power = speed.

You got that around the wrong way. With a lot of power you can gear it down for very quick acceleration, but without the torque your top speed will suffer. So on a simplistic basis, you could say that power=acceleration and torque=top speed. Of course gearing affects this, but that's the basics.

A lot of people talk about fast drag cars which have a lot of torque, but these also have a shitload of power. Take a look at a Mack truck. It has mammoth amounts of torque but not too much power (on a relative scale). They accelerate like slugs but can still get up to well beyond highway speeds. You're not going to run a 9s quarter mile on a normal truck engine no matter what your gearing is.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/5553-power-vs-torque/#findComment-86801
Share on other sites

Well jim your half right.

I still say torque = acceleration. Which gear gives the greatest rate of acceleration, first gear or top gear ? Why ?

Tractive effort is what accelerates the vehicle.

Now if you want to talk about the fastest way to cover a certain distance, that is different thing altogether. What you need is the HIGHEST AVERAGE SPEED to cover a given distance in the shortest possible time.

For this you need high power, because time becomes an important part of the problem. So yes, high power is the most significant factor in getting a low ET, or high terminal speed.

So power = speed.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/5553-power-vs-torque/#findComment-86848
Share on other sites

Warpspeed,

Torque is the only thing acting on your wheels, so you're splitting hairs here. The simple reason why your car accelerates slower in a taller gear is because you are reducing the power to your wheels. Have you ever seen a dyno chart? The torque curve stays fairly flat all the way along, but the power goes up with the speed and eventually tapers off. If what you were saying was true it'd be the other way around.

What I'm saying is if you have a high powered engine with not a lot of torque, you can compensate for a lack of torque with gearing, which will improve your acceleration but won't improve your top speed unless you had a really short ratio, and you lengthen it to the point of finding the engine's torque limits.

Once you're past the threshold of your maximum torque, no amount of gearing will increase your top speed. Even if you're not redlining, eventually there will be a gear ratio that will limit the vehicle's top speed. It is a lack of torque here that's stopping you going any faster, not power. Therefore you could say that the amount of torque governs your top speed.

Your example actually illustrates this. You're talking about a high terminal speed. You're using power to accelerate to this speed, not maintain it. So yes, you need a high powered engine to get to that point as quickly as possible, but the actual speed you can reach is a reflection of your torque.

Even most normal cars have enough power and torque to keep accelerating way beyond the standing quarter mile so it's not a very good example. I have ridden 250cc motorcycles that can accelerate quite quickly to about 130kph, but the top speed is like 150 and the acceleration from 130-150 is much less than from 0-130. When at 150 in top gear, the engine is way below redline but it just won't go any faster even if you drop it back a gear. These bikes have high powered engines (40hp or so) but very little torque, which is why they can't go any faster.

I maintain that I am entirely correct, and even your example proves this. If I'm half correct then that means you're also half correct, which means we're both correct? That doesn't make any sense :D

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/5553-power-vs-torque/#findComment-86857
Share on other sites

I have read through what you said a few times, and cannot disagree, I think we are looking at the same problem from a different angle.

For instance you say when you go up a gear the power to the wheels drops because engine RPM drop. Quite true, I had never really thought of it quite like that.

And as you say if the torque curve is (almost) flat, then the torque at the wheels will drop because the reduction ratio through the gearbox is less in the higher gear. It is really saying the same thing but looking at it from a different perspective.

When gearing a competition car for maximum performance it is the power curve that is most important. Gearchange points should be either side of the maximum peak power point so maximum area through the power curve can be used in each gear.

The torque multiplication through the gearbox will be maximum under these conditions in each gear, giving greatest acceleration.

If you only rev it to the engine torque peak at the same road speed, you will be in a much higher gear, and actual acceleration will be less.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/5553-power-vs-torque/#findComment-86869
Share on other sites

Warp u sumed it up with this statement, I was wondering who would get it right first 10 points.

"Gearchange points should be either side of the maximum peak power point so maximum area through the power curve can be used in each gear. "

totaly true. thats how i geared my car

my car only uses a 1500 rpm rev range

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/5553-power-vs-torque/#findComment-86944
Share on other sites

Guest (_W.4.S.P._)

this is a great topic ,,

For cars what mods increase power or torque??? c'n'paste

so torque will get increased by a longer stroking engine or by a larger cubic capacity

and

power will increase by getting more revolutions per minute onto the rear wheels ?( motor, g box , diff ? )

umm ,, side Q? ... what stops a cummins turbo deisel from reving to 9000 per min? roller bearing the thing and put it in a gemini and bombs away ????

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/5553-power-vs-torque/#findComment-86968
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Any update on this one? did you manage to get it fixed?    i'm having the same issue with my r34 and i believe its to do with the smart entry (keyless) control module but cant be sure without forking out to get a replacement  
    • So this being my first contribution to the SAU forums, I'd like to present and show how I had to solve probably one of the most annoying fixes on any car I've owned: replacing a speedometer (or "speedo") sensor on my newly acquired Series 1 Stagea 260RS Autech Version. I'm simply documenting how I went about to fix this issue, and as I understand it is relatively rare to happen to this generation of cars, it is a gigantic PITA so I hope this helps serve as reference to anyone else who may encounter this issue. NOTE: Although I say this is meant for the 260RS, because the gearbox/drivetrain is shared with the R33 GTR with the 5-speed manual, the application should be exactly the same. Background So after driving my new-to-me Stagea for about 1500km, one night while driving home the speedometer and odometer suddenly stopped working. No clunking noise, no indication something was broken, the speedometer would just stop reading anything and the odometer stopped going up. This is a huge worry for me, because my car is relatively low mileage (only 45k km when purchased) so although I plan to own the car for a long time, a mismatched odometer reading would be hugely detrimental to resale should the day come to sell the car. Thankfully this only occurred a mile or two from home so it wasn't extremely significant. Also, the OCD part of me would be extremely irked if the numbers that showed on my dash doesn't match the actual ageing of the car. Diagnosing I had been in communication with the well renown GTR shop in the USA, U.P.garage up near University Point in Washington state. After some back and forth they said it could be one of two things: 1) The speedometer sensor that goes into the transfer case is broken 2) The actual cluster has a component that went kaput. They said this is common in older Nissan gauge clusters and that would indicate a rebuild is necessary. As I tried to figure out if it was problem #1, I resolved problem #2 by sending my cluster over to Relentless Motorsports in Dallas, TX, whom is local to me and does cluster and ECU rebuilds. He is a one man operation who meticulously replaces every chip, resistor, capacitor, and electronic component on the PCB's on a wide variety of classic and modern cars. His specialty is Lexus and Toyota, but he came highly recommended by Erik of U.P.garage since he does the rebuilds for them on GTR clusters.  For those that don't know, on R32 and R33 GTR gearboxes, the speedometer sensor is mounted in the transfer case and is purely an analog mini "generator" (opposite of an alternator essentially). Based on the speed the sensor spins it generates an AC sine wave voltage up to 5V, and sends that via two wires up to the cluster which then interprets it via the speedometer dial. The signal does NOT go to the ECU first, the wiring goes to the cluster first then the ECU after (or so I'm told).  Problems/Roadblocks I first removed the part from the car on the underside of the transfer case (drain your transfer case fluid/ATF first, guess who found out that the hard way?), and noted the transfer case fluid was EXTREMELY black, most likely never changed on my car. When attempting to turn the gears it felt extremely gritty, as if something was binding the shaft from rotating properly. I got absolutely no voltage reading out of the sensor no matter how fast I turned the shaft. After having to reflow the solder on my AFM sensors based on another SAU guide here, I attempted to disassemble the silicone seal on the back of the sensor to see what happened inside the sensor; turns out, it basically disintegrated itself. Wonderful. Not only had the electrical components destroyed themselves, the magnetic portion on what I thought was on the shaft also chipped and was broken. Solution So solution: find a spare part right? Wrong. Nissan has long discontinued the proper sensor part number 32702-21U19, and it is no longer obtainable either through Nissan NSA or Nissan Japan. I was SOL without proper speed or mileage readings unless I figured out a way to replace this sensor. After tons of Googling and searching on SAU, I found that there IS however a sensor that looks almost exactly like the R33/260RS one: a sensor meant for the R33/R34 GTT and GTS-T with the 5 speed manual. The part number was 25010-21U00, and the body, plug, and shaft all looked exactly the same. The gear was different at the end, but knowing the sensor's gear is held on with a circlip, I figured I could just order the part and swap the gears. Cue me ordering a new part from JustJap down in Kirrawee, NSW, then waiting almost 3 weeks for shipping and customs clearing. The part finally arrives and what did I find? The freaking shaft lengths don't match. $&%* I discussed with Erik how to proceed, and figuring that I basically destroyed the sensor trying to get the shaft out of the damaged sensor from my car. we deemed it too dangerous to try and attempt to swap shafts to the correct length. I had to find a local CNC machinist to help me cut and notch down the shaft. After tons of frantic calling on a Friday afternoon, I managed to get hold of someone and he said he'd be able to do it over half a week. I sent him photos and had him take measurements to match not only the correct length and notch fitment, but also a groove to machine out to hold the retentive circlip. And the end result? *chef's kiss* Perfect. Since I didn't have pliers with me when I picked up the items, I tested the old gear and circlip on. Perfect fit. After that it was simply swapping out the plug bracket to the new sensor, mount it on the transfer case, refill with ATF/Nissan Matic Fluid D, then test out function. Thankfully with the rebuilt cluster and the new sensor, both the speedometer and odometer and now working properly!   And there you have it. About 5-6 weeks of headaches wrapped up in a 15 minute photo essay. As I was told it is rare for sensors of this generation to die so dramatically, but you never know what could go wrong with a 25+ year old car. I HOPE that no one else has to go through this problem like I did, so with my take on a solution I hope it helps others who may encounter this issue in the future. For the TL;DR: 1) Sensor breaks. 2) Find a replacement GTT/GTS-T sensor. 3) Find a CNC machinist to have you cut it down to proper specs. 4) Reinstall then pray to the JDM gods.   Hope this guide/story helps anyone else encountering this problem!
    • So this being my first contribution to the SAU forums, I'd like to present and show how I had to solve probably one of the most annoying fixes on any car I've owned: replacing a speedometer (or "speedo") sensor on my newly acquired Series 1 Stagea 260RS Autech Version. I'm simply documenting how I went about to fix this issue, and as I understand it is relatively rare to happen to this generation of cars, it is a gigantic PITA so I hope this helps serve as reference to anyone else who may encounter this issue. NOTE: Although I say this is meant for the 260RS, because the gearbox/drivetrain is shared with the R33 GTR with the 5-speed manual, the application should be exactly the same. Background So after driving my new-to-me Stagea for about 1500km, one night while driving home the speedometer and odometer suddenly stopped working. No clunking noise, no indication something was broken, the speedometer would just stop reading anything and the odometer stopped going up. This is a huge worry for me, because my car is relatively low mileage (only 45k km when purchased) so although I plan to own the car for a long time, a mismatched odometer reading would be hugely detrimental to resale should the day come to sell the car. Thankfully this only occurred a mile or two from home so it wasn't extremely significant. Also, the OCD part of me would be extremely irked if the numbers that showed on my dash doesn't match the actual ageing of the car. Diagnosing I had been in communication with the well renown GTR shop in the USA, U.P.garage up near University Point in Washington state. After some back and forth they said it could be one of two things: 1) The speedometer sensor that goes into the transfer case is broken 2) The actual cluster has a component that went kaput. They said this is common in older Nissan gauge clusters and that would indicate a rebuild is necessary. As I tried to figure out if it was problem #1, I resolved problem #2 by sending my cluster over to Relentless Motorsports in Dallas, TX, whom is local to me and does cluster and ECU rebuilds. He is a one man operation who meticulously replaces every chip, resistor, capacitor, and electronic component on the PCB's on a wide variety of classic and modern cars. His specialty is Lexus and Toyota, but he came highly recommended by Erik of U.P.garage since he does the rebuilds for them on GTR clusters.  For those that don't know, on R32 and R33 GTR gearboxes, the speedometer sensor is mounted in the transfer case and is purely an analog mini "generator" (opposite of an alternator essentially). Based on the speed the sensor spins it generates an AC sine wave voltage up to 5V, and sends that via two wires up to the cluster which then interprets it via the speedometer dial. The signal does NOT go to the ECU first, the wiring goes to the cluster first then the ECU after (or so I'm told).  Problems/Roadblocks I first removed the part from the car on the underside of the transfer case (drain your transfer case fluid/ATF first, guess who found out that the hard way?), and noted the transfer case fluid was EXTREMELY black, most likely never changed on my car. When attempting to turn the gears it felt extremely gritty, as if shttps://imgur.com/6TQCG3xomething was binding the shaft from rotating properly. After having to reflow the solder on my AFM sensors based on another SAU guide here, I attempted to disassemble the silicone seal on the back of the sensor to see what happened inside the sensor; turns out, it basically disintegrated itself. Wonderful. Not only had the electrical components destroyed themselves, the magnetic portion on what I thought was on the shaft also chipped and was broken. Solution So solution: find a spare part right? Wrong. Nissan has long discontinued the proper sensor part number 32702-21U19, and it is no longer obtainable either through Nissan NSA or Nissan Japan. I was SOL without proper speed or mileage readings unless I figured out a way to replace this sensor. After tons of Googling and searching on SAU, I found that there IS however a sensor that looks almost exactly like the R33/260RS one: a sensor meant for the R33/R34 GTT and GTS-T with the 5 speed manual. The part number was 25010-21U00, and the body, plug, and shaft all looked exactly the same. The gear was different at the end, but knowing the sensor's gear is held on with a circlip, I figured I could just order the part and swap the gears. Cue me ordering a new part from JustJap down in Kirrawee, NSW, then waiting almost 3 weeks for shipping and customs clearing. The part finally arrives and what did I find? The freaking shaft lengths don't match. $&%* I discussed with Erik how to proceed, and figuring that I basically destroyed the sensor trying to get the shaft out of the damaged sensor from my car. we deemed it too dangerous to try and attempt to swap shafts to the correct length. I had to find a local CNC machinist to help me cut and notch down the shaft. After tons of frantic calling on a Friday afternoon, I managed to get hold of someone and he said he'd be able to do it over half a week. I sent him photos and had him take measurements to match not only the correct length and notch fitment, but also a groove to machine out to hold the retentive circlip. And the end result? *chef's kiss* Perfect. Since I didn't have pliers with me when I picked up the items, I tested the old gear and circlip on. Perfect fit. After that it was simply swapping out the plug bracket to the new sensor, mount it on the transfer case, refill with ATF/Nissan Matic Fluid D, then test out function. Thankfully with the rebuilt cluster and the new sensor, both the speedometer and odometer and now working properly!   And there you have it. About 5-6 weeks of headaches wrapped up in a 15 minute photo essay. As I was told it is rare for sensors of this generation to die so dramatically, but you never know what could go wrong with a 25+ year old car. I HOPE that no one else has to go through this problem like I did, so with my take on a solution I hope it helps others who may encounter this issue in the future. For the TL;DR: 1) Sensor breaks. 2) Find a replacement GTT/GTS-T sensor. 3) Find a CNC machinist to have you cut it down to proper specs. 4) Reinstall then pray to the JDM gods.   Hope this guide/story helps anyone else encountering this problem!
    • perhaps i should have mentioned, I plugged the unit in before i handed over to the electronics repair shop to see what damaged had been caused and the unit worked (ac controls, rear demister etc) bar the lights behind the lcd. i would assume that the diode was only to control lighting and didnt harm anything else i got the unit back from the electronics repair shop and all is well (to a point). The lights are back on and ac controls are working. im still paranoid as i beleive the repairer just put in any zener diode he could find and admitted asking chatgpt if its compatible   i do however have another issue... sometimes when i turn the ignition on, the climate control unit now goes through a diagnostics procedure which normally occurs when you disconnect and reconnect but this may be due to the below   to top everything off, and feel free to shoot me as im just about to do it myself anyway, while i was checking the newly repaired board by plugging in the climate control unit bare without the housing, i believe i may have shorted it on the headunit surround. Climate control unit still works but now the keyless entry doesnt work along with the dome light not turning on when you open the door. to add to this tricky situation, when you start the car and remove the key ( i have a turbo timer so car remains on) the keyless entry works. the dome light also works when you switch to the on position. fuses were checked and all ok ive deduced that the short somehow has messed with the smart entry control module as that is what controls the keyless entry and dome light on door opening   you guys wouldnt happen to have any experience with that topic lmao... im only laughing as its all i can do right now my self diagnosed adhd always gets me in a situation as i have no patience and want to get everything done in shortest amount of time as possible often ignoring crucial steps such as disconnecting battery when stuffing around with electronics or even placing a simple rag over the metallic headunit surround when placing a live pcb board on top of it   FML
    • Bit of a pity we don't have good images of the back/front of the PCB ~ that said, I found a YT vid of a teardown to replace dicky clock switches, and got enough of a glimpse to realize this PCB is the front-end to a connected to what I'll call PCBA, and as such this is all digital on this PCB..ergo, battery voltage probably doesn't make an appearance here ; that is, I'd expect them to do something on PCBA wrt power conditioning for the adjustment/display/switch PCB.... ....given what's transpired..ie; some permutation of 12vdc on a 5vdc with or without correct polarity...would explain why the zener said "no" and exploded. The transistor Q5 (M33) is likely to be a digital switching transistor...that is, package has builtin bias resistors to ensure it saturates as soon as base threshold voltage is reached (minimal rise/fall time)....and wrt the question 'what else could've fried?' ....well, I know there's an MCU on this board (display, I/O at a guess), and you hope they isolated it from this scenario...I got my crayons out, it looks a bit like this...   ...not a lot to see, or rather, everything you'd like to see disappears down a via to the other side...base drive for the transistor comes from somewhere else, what this transistor is switching is somewhere else...but the zener circuit is exclusive to all this ~ it's providing a set voltage (current limited by the 1K3 resistor R19)...and disappears somewhere else down the via I marked V out ; if the errant voltage 'jumped' the diode in the millisecond before it exploded, whatever that V out via feeds may have seen a spike... ....I'll just imagine that Q5 was switched off at the time, thus no damage should've been done....but whatever that zener feeds has to be checked... HTH
×
×
  • Create New...