Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I wore my rear passenger side tyre out on my '98 Gts2.5t in 5,000km. The other tyres are all less than half worn. The car has a lock diff, so both rear tyres should wear the same.

The reason for this wear is the car has been set up for drifting. I took it to a wheel alignment place and they reckon that there is a bush inside the rear hub that may have to be replaced. They reckon the car probably has an offset bush in it and it should be returned to std for road use.

Anyone had this experience???? Are they talking sense or crap???? I'd appreciate comments.

PS You can actually see the camber on the wheel with the naked eye.

PPS SK, I need to get this alignment prob fixed, and can't see myself getting to Sydney for a while, so I'm using a local business that reckon they have seen and repaired/modded this problem out. My suspension mods will still go ahead, but I have to be a bit more patient and schedule it and the power fc etc to early next year.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/56212-camber-on-rear-tyre/
Share on other sites

Skylines have adjustable camber on the rear, standard. The range of adjustment is quite small though. Usually not enough to remove enough negative camber after you lower them. So Whiteline have adjustable (eccentric) polyurethane bushes, one set is usually enough, they go on the inner joint of the upper arm. Sometimes you need 2 sets, they go on the outer joint where the upper arm joins the upright.

The rule is to take as much negative out with the standard adjuster and see how much more is needed. If it is more than 1.5 degrees, then you need 2 sets of polyurethane bushes.

Hope that helps.

You'll definitely need some alignment figures to work on. And I wouldnt waste my time with camber offset bushes. Just go the arms for a lil more money and you can install em yourself.

$249 for new ones @

http://www.garage-13.com/suspension.html

You'll definitely need some alignment figures to work on. And I wouldnt waste my time with camber offset bushes. Just go the arms for a lil more money and you can install em yourself.  

$249 for new ones @

http://www.garage-13.com/suspension.html

The arms have non greasable spherical bushes. On Australian roads with the bumps and dirt, they don't last very long and the knocking will drive you crazy.:(

Since mine just arrived today are there any strategies I for me to employ for getting the most possible wear out of them? Like greasing them up and then putting a huge glob of vasoline over it?

(that's as ingenius as i get with mechanic stuff)

Ask the supplier for a set of seals, some manufacturers have them. The look like litte cups that fit over the spherical bearings and keep the dirt out and the grease in. They obviously have a hole in them for the bolt to go though and you need a pair for each bearing, one each side. They can be plastic or alloy.

The sphericals may have threaded holes in the side for grease nipples, so you can apply grease with a grease gun at pressure from the inside out. This squeezes any dirt to the outside which you can then wipe off. Ask if they have grease nipples as an option.

With both dust covers and internal greasing you might get 10,000k's out of them before the sphericals need replacing. Separately purchased, the sphericals will cost more than the arms, most people just buy new arms when they start knocking. The Japanese manufacturers sometimes use unique sphericals, so you have no choice but to buy complete arms.

Hope that helps:cheers:

OK, how long do the polyurethane bushes last [as opposed to the arms=10,000km with care], and is cost comparible???

A Skyline example, I have a set that has done over 40,000 ks in an R32 GTR. A non Skyline example has done over 100,000 k's on the poly bushes in the front inner uppers of a double wishbone design. It was the old Foulcan tow car we had before the Stagea arrived. The bushes themselves are quite cheap, the labour cost little more. But after you have changed the sphericals several times, I don't think that matters much.:)

Ok here's my results, finally got an alignment.

They recommend a top and bottom bush set for the rear, and just the one set for the front.

They normally deal with Super Pro, but I asked them to get Whiteline [only heard good things about them, haven't heard of Super pro at all{they are probably good to}. They said no problems, Whiteline was OK.

Yeah, best I could do [with the image], had to sharpen it and remove noise as it was.

If you save it, you can zoom in and it's a bit better. The printout is a grey print on white.

The bush kit should do the trick, and according to SK it is the most preferable option. I don't think anybody have aligned the car in a long time.

Gotta agree that bushes are the best option for a road car.

Have to disagree with SK on the spherical bearing deal though. I've got non greasable sphericals on both my castor rods and my rear upper links on an S14. Both have now done over 40,000km with near zero problems. I had to remove the rear arms at one point and apply bearing lock to the spacers either side of the spherical bearing balls to stop the spacers rotating relative to the chassis mounts but otherwise haven't had any trouble with them. The only reason I don't recommend them for mainly street driven cars is the increase in NVH they cause due to the loss of compliance. For hard driven street/track cars they are perfect.

If you were to get adjustable camber arms, do you need to get adjustable toe/traction arms like I was told? My cars an r32 but it would be the same for an r34 wouldn't it?

Very sorry to have hyjacked, but it may be relivant if you do need to change these.

If you were to get adjustable camber arms, do you need to get adjustable toe/traction arms like I was told?  My cars an r32 but it would be the same for an r34 wouldn't it?

Very sorry to have hyjacked, but it may be relivant if you do need to change these.

I have no idea what a "traction arm" is, but R32/33/34's all have adjustable toe standard.:)

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • You won't need to do that if your happy to learn to tune it yourself. You 100% do not need to do that. It is not part of the learning process. It's not like driving on track and 'finding the limit by stepping over the limit'. You should not ever accidently blow up an engine and you should have setup the ECU's engine protection to save you from yourself while you are learning anyway. Plenty of us have tuned their own cars, myself included. We still come here for advice/guidance/new ideas etc.  What have you been doing so far to learn how to tune?
    • Put the ECU's MAP line in your mouth. Blow as hard as you can. You should be able to see about 10 kPa, maybe 15 kPa positive pressure. Suck on it. You should be able to generate a decent vacuum to about the same level also. Note that this is only ~2 psi either way. If the MAP is reading -5 psi all the time, ignition on, engine running or not, driving around or not, then it is severely f**ked. Also, you SHOULD NOT BE DRIVING IT WITHOUT A LOAD REFERENCE. You will break the engine. Badly.
    • Could be correct. Meter might be that far out. Compare against a known 5 ohm 1% resistor.
    • @Murray_Calavera  If I were an expert I wouldn't be in here looking for assistance.  I am extremely computer literate, have above average understanding on how things should be working and how they should tie together.  If I need to go to a professional tuner so be it, but I'd much rather learn and do things myself even if it means looking for some guidance along the way and blowing up a few engines. @GTSBoy  I was hoping it would be as simple as a large vacuum leak somewhere but I'm unable to find anything, all lines seem to be well capped or going where they need to be, and when removed there is vacuum felt on the tube.  It would be odd for the Haltech built in MAP to be faulty, the GTT tune I imported had it enabled from the start, I incorrectly assumed it was reading a signal from the stock MAP, but that doesn't exist.  After running a vacuum hose to the ECU the signal doesn't change more than 0.2 in either direction.   I'll probably upload a video of my settings tomorrow, as it stands I'm able to daily drive, but getting stuttering when giving it gas from idle, so pulling away from lights is a slow process of revving it up and feathering the clutch until its moving, then it will accelerate fine.  It sounds like I need to get to the bottom of the manifold pressure issue, but the ignition timing section is most intimidating to me and will probably let a pro do that part.  Tomorrow I'll try a different vacuum line to T off of, with any luck I selected one that was already bypassed during the DBW swap.  (edit: I went out and did it right now, the line I had chosen did appear to have no vacuum on it, it used to go to the front of the intake, I've now completely blocked that one off at the bracket that holds several vacuum lines by the firewall.  I T'd into the vacuum line that goes from that bracket to the vacuum pump at the front of the car, but no change in the MAP readings).  Using the new vacuum line that has obvious vacuum on the hose, im still only getting readings between -6.0 and -5.2.  I'm wondering why the ECU was detecting -5.3 when nothing was connected to the MAP nipple and ECU MAP selected as the source. @feartherb26  I do have +T in the works but wanted to wait until Spring to start with that swap since this is my good winter AWD vehicle.  When removing the butterfly, did it leave a bunch of holes in the manifold that you needed to plug?  I thought about removing it but assumed it would be a mess.   I notice no difference when capping the vacuum line to it or letting it do its thing.  This whole thing has convinced me to just get a forward facing manifold when the time comes though.
    • Update: tested my spark plugs that are supposed to be 5ohms with a 10% deviation and one gave me a 0 ohms reading and the rest were 3.9ohm<, so one bad and the others on their way out.
×
×
  • Create New...