Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi all,

just a few quick questions.

Im in the process of building me a RB30, with GTR head and T78. I have sorted out what rods to use but have no idea what forged pistons to use :)

Can anyone please give me some help with some part numbers or specification as to what forged pistons i should be using?

I appreciate all your help

thanks

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/57382-building-a-rb30/
Share on other sites

1FSTKR it all depends on the intended use of the engine and the budget you have . If this thing is a flat out drag engine it could just about use the T78 . If you look at Garys (SydneyKid) posts it appears there are two levels of build .

1) 450 odd ATW HP: Std RB30E block crank rods pistons water pump and maybe

oil pump . RB30 water pumps are designed to move lots of water at relatively low revs , most are using RB26 pumps wich allow you to extend the rev range upwards without pump cavitation . The RB30 water pump is the cheapest new one but plenty of good 2nd hand RB26 ones around . All the R32 series and early R33 RB25 oil pumps fit the RB30 crank . I am using a good 2nd hand R32 RB26N1 pump , the only diff between this and std RB 26 is the relief valve spring tension . The RB30 is the only block without piston oil squirters - best solution is to ceramic coat your piston crowns . Using RB30E (NA) pistons with RB 4 valve heads gives around 8.2-8.3 CR , using RB30ET (Turbo) pistons from memory gives 6.8-7.0 CR .

4 valve heads are around 63-64cc chambers , the 2 valve heads were less and gave 9 and 7.8 CR .

For engines in this power range 8.5-9.0 CR makes the engine crisper , (more torque off boost and better drivability and fuel consumption at part throttle) . Some say they're achieving this by using Arias forged high top pistons , others are using JE VG30DETT pistons (larger 22mm insted of 21mm gudgeon pins and + 1.5mm or 87.5) decking the block around 1mm to get approx 8.6 CR . More can be had by more decking plus a smidge off the piston up to around 9.0 CR . It is VERY important to achieve 25-40 thou piston to head clearence to get effective squish or quench to lessen the chance of detonation . 25-30 thou is considered very good .

RB26 heads use larger diameter bolts so block holes to be re-drilled and tapped .

RB26 440cc injectors supposed to be good for 400-420hp .

Using cast Nissan pistons will require the timing and air fuel ratios be correct because if they are detonated they break ring lands .

2) The 900hp version needs good rods ie Carillo , better valves retainers springs cams rod bolts head fixings main cap studs and nuts and probably an O ringed block . I think all this is aimed at coping with higher rpms and power loads . Some are using 86.5mm pistons to leave a little more meat in the block . I have been advised not to use the RB26 N1 water pump as it is designed not to cavitate in constant high rev environments but does not move enough water at road speed revs to cool effectively .

This is only a brief overview and I think it is correct but you need to be sure so double check .

Hope this helps cheers A .

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/57382-building-a-rb30/#findComment-1108087
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Have a look at that (shitty) pic I posted. You can see AN -4 braided line coming to a -4 to 1/8 BSPT adapter, into a 1/8 BSPT T piece. The Haltech pressure sender is screwed into the long arm of the sender and factory sender (pre your pic) into the T side. You can also see the cable tie holding the whole contraption in place. Is it better than mounting the sender direct to your engine fitting......yes because it removes that vibration as the engine revs out 50 times every lap and that factory sender is pretty big. Is it necessary for you......well I've got no idea, I just don't like something important failing twice so over-engineer it to the moon!
    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
    • I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
×
×
  • Create New...