Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

If there are posts on this can someone please point me in the right direction as when i searched i couldn't find much.

Anyway when my 33 got here from japan it had no water lines connected to the turbo and they were simply blocked off. The turbo is a HKS2835R Pro. My mates R33 also had a GT3037S and it had water lines disconnected too. My car was apparently built by a fairly reparable japanese tuning house so i'm not sure why they would not connect them. Any ideas? What are the pros and cons of connecting them? I was reading on another forum about how the water flowing through them does shorten the life of the turbo, but i'm just not how? surely water flowing through the turbo wouldn't wear away the centre that quick if at all?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/57569-water-cooling-on-turbos-do-u-need-it/
Share on other sites

Most samller ball bearing turbos will have water cooling due to there being less oil flow for cooling because of the restrictor.

Saying this I have seen cars with the water blocked off. Maybe on a drag car or similar they don't see the same heat as they are only going for a few seconds?

I guess it all depends how it's designed and what it's being used for.

It was a lot of extra work running the pipes etc on my car for the water and oil.. but I think it's worth it.. and it looks good too :D

Water has a high thermal mass - it takes a lot of energy to boil it . If the turbos bearing housing can be kept at or below 100deg C the lubricating oil flowing through it will not burn or solidify killing the bearings . This is most likely to happen when the engine is shut down hot , the bearing core hanging off a potentially red hot exhaust manifold and turbine housing can roast any oil present . Contrary to popular belief many OEM water cooled turbos don't have water pumped through them but have one water fitting higher than the other to allow thermosyphoning . It does not take much water volume to maintain a safe temperature in the turbos water jacket for the 3-5 min after shut down that is critical . When I fitted the GT28RS to my old FJ20 I used the blocks drain plug hole for the water inlet and drilled / tapped the head behind the thermostat for the hot water outlet . After shut down you could hear water boiling in the turbo , the bubbles rising up the high pipe , out through the thermostat and rad cap into the overflow recovery bottle . Obviously the boiling water was being replaced by cooler water lower in the cooling system untill the bearing housing got down to or below 100 C . I think all turbo SR's and RB's had factory water cooled turbos so the inlet and outlet should be there . If you can use it because its cheaper than fried turbos .

Can you post pics of the exhaust housing side of your turbo please , I'd like to see what sort of dump pipe pattern the HKS GT Pro housings use .

Thanks A .

yeah i will post pics later on today of the dump pipe when i get a chance to take photo's. It is a strange pattern though. Its the internal wastegate version too.

discopotato03 I see what your saying about the water lines though. I'm guessing my car was previously used as a weekend track car of some sort going by the size turbo (not drag spec is it) and lack of lag and the rubber it had on it (falken azenis) and the larger aftermarket radiator and the alloy coolant surge tanks it has. I still can't understand why they just wouldn't hook them up.

I can think of one reason not to connect the water lines, the cyclic thermal stressing of the turbo housing would surely reduce the life of the turbo. It would not be a problem if the engine always ran at steady state, but they never do, full throtle, fullboost, off boost, high rev, low rev, low trotle, idle, you get the idea.

Water running through the turbo would create huge thermal gradients as the turbo rapidly heats and cools as hot exhaust gasses and cool water flow through the housing. the thermal stressing could posibly lead to cracking of the housing and distortion of the bearing surfaces.

Now that is a reason I have thought of, the engineers who design these things are very clever people and they most certianly thought of these things. I am saying that manufactures of performace parts are usually looking for performance (supprise!!!) rather than reliability. So water cooled turbos obviously work and I think they probably work better in the short run for high performance applications but in the long run realability could be a problem.

Having said all of this I cannot say I have ever seen a turbo fail from causes which can be directly linked to the turbo being watercooled. Just a posibility.

Thanks ookami , off topic I know but I need to see one as the T3 flanged GT3037 Pro S probably uses a similar integral gate version of the housing and dump .

I've been told that on race cars the water cooling is sometimes deleted to reduce complexity and long term reliability devices are not needed .

thanks guys, i think i'll be connecting them back up once i get my car back. I just can't see a valid reason as to why i should not connect them up. After thinking about it for a while could it possible that the coolant lines were not connected to help keep engine temps down? I mean my car has a larger alloy radiator and 2 coolant surge tanks so it must have run pretty hot to need that? The coolant that was in there was like a aqua colour and burnt the hell out of my skin too :(

Actually Pat it works the other way . The thermal mass of the bearing housing is quite small and with water in it it never gets red hot . With todays iron alloys the heat to the bearing housing is not a problem . Its keeping the oil temperature below the cooking temperature that is the issue .

The exact reason why car manufacturers do it is so that turbo engines can be shut down like any other engine and not have heat related turbo failures . Manufacturers put long waranty periods on new cars and todays drivers don't want to be bothered with tiresome idle down antics . Another thing to think about is todays lean burn engines exhaust gas temperatures are highest in highway cruise mode . Full load and boost EGT's are significantly lower .

u dont need them connected... the water cooled turbos are usually only the bb turbos

btw if its not connected im sure there would not be anywhere to connect water to it as they would have done this otherwise

  • 2 weeks later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Who did you have do the installation? I actually know someone who is VERY familiar with the AVS gear. The main point of contact though would be your installer.   Where are you based in NZ?
    • Look, realistically, those are some fairly chunky connectors and wires so it is a reasonably fair bet that that loom was involved in the redirection of the fuel pump and/or ECU/ignition power for the immobiliser. It's also fair to be that the new immobiliser is essentially the same thing as the old one, and so it probably needs the same stuff done to make it do what it has to do. Given that you are talking about a car that no-one else here is familiar with (I mean your exact car) and an alarm that I've never heard of before and so probably not many others are familiar with, and that some wire monkey has been messing with it out of our sight, it seems reasonable that the wire monkey should be fixing this.
    • Wheel alignment immediately. Not "when I get around to it". And further to what Duncan said - you cannot just put camber arms on and shorten them. You will introduce bump steer far in excess of what the car had with stock arms. You need adjustable tension arms and they need to be shortened also. The simplest approach is to shorten them the same % as the stock ones. This will not be correct or optimal, but it will be better than any other guess. The correct way to set the lengths of both arms is to use a properly built/set up bump steer gauge and trial and error the adjustments until you hit the camber you need and want and have minimum bump steer in the range of motion that the wheel is expected to travel. And what Duncan said about toe is also very true. And you cannot change the camber arm without also affecting toe. So when you have adjustable arms on the back of a Skyline, the car either needs to go to a talented wheel aligner (not your local tyre shop dropout), or you need to be able to do this stuff yourself at home. Guess which approach I have taken? I have built my own gear for camber, toe and bump steer measurement and I do all this on the flattest bit of concrete I have, with some shims under the tyres on one side to level the car.
    • Thought I would get some advice from others on this situation.    Relevant info: R33 GTS25t Link G4x ECU Walbro 255LPH w/ OEM FP Relay (No relay mod) Scenario: I accidentally messed up my old AVS S5 (rev.1) at the start of the year and the cars been immobilised. Also the siren BBU has completely failed; so I decided to upgrade it.  I got a newer AVS S5 (rev.2?) installed on Friday. The guy removed the old one and its immobilisers. Tried to start it; the car cranks but doesnt start.  The new one was installed and all the alarm functions seem to be working as they should; still wouldn't start Went to bed; got up on Friday morning and decided to have a look into the no start problem. Found the car completely dead.  Charged the battery; plugged it back in and found the brake lights were stuck on.  Unplugging the brake pedal switch the lights turn off. Plug it back in and theyre stuck on again. I tested the switch (continuity test and resistance); all looks good (0-1kohm).  On talking to AVS; found its because of the rubber stopper on the brake pedal; sure enough the middle of it is missing so have ordered a new one. One of those wear items; which was confusing what was going on However when I try unplugging the STOP Light fuses (under the dash and under the hood) the brake light still stays on. Should those fuses not cut the brake light circuit?  I then checked the ECU; FP Speed Error.  Testing the pump again; I can hear the relay clicking every time I switch it to ON. I unplugged the pump and put the multimeter across the plug. No continuity; im seeing 0.6V (ECU signal?) and when it switches the relay I think its like 20mA or 200mA). Not seeing 12.4V / 7-9A. As far as I know; the Fuel Pump was wired through one of the immobiliser relays on the old alarm.  He pulled some thick gauged harness out with the old alarm wiring; which looks to me like it was to bridge connections into the immobilisers? Before it got immobilised it was running just fine.  Im at a loss to why the FP is getting no voltage; I thought maybe the FP was faulty (even though I havent even done 50km on the new pump) but no voltage at the harness plug.  Questions: Could it be he didnt reconnect the fuel pump when testing it after the old alarm removal (before installing the new alarm)?  Is this a case of bridging to the brake lights instead of the fuel pump circuit? It's a bit beyond me as I dont do a lot with electrical; so have tried my best to diagnose what I think seems to make sense.  Seeking advice if theres for sure an issue with the alarm install to get him back here; or if I do infact, need an auto electrician to diagnose it. 
    • Then, shorten them by 1cm, drop the car back down and have a visual look (or even better, use a spirit level across the wheel to see if you have less camber than before. You still want something like 1.5 for road use. Alternatively, if you have adjustable rear ride height (I assume you do if you have extreme camber wear), raise the suspension back to standard height until you can get it all aligned properly. Finally, keep in mind that wear on the inside of the tyre can be for incorrect toe, not just camber
×
×
  • Create New...