Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I have heard nothing but good reports from ATP, and have personally seen a few cars running with Kyp's turbo's. My mechanic, for 3 years, uses no-one else when modifying turbos.

I would suggest that you contact Johnson Performance Centre which is in Lalor.  Highly regarded as one of the leading modification workshops in Melbourne and my personal experience has been fantastic.

"highly regarded" by who? :confused:

In all my time on this forum i have not heard of this workshop. It is great that they have treated you well, but please don't glorify their reputation without justification.

  • Replies 44
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Al, JPC is in Thomastown, they had the fastest VL for a while or something not far off it.

They are no new-comer to performance. Whilst i havent had a positive (or cheap) expiriance with them they are still up there in terms of good workshops.

I've had an ATP stage 2 highflowed turbo in my 'line for about a year now......great power gain for the money ...

Very nice power, nice and punchy...i was so depressed getting back in my RB20 after a drive in your car:(

As for JPC, coming from Sydney, they are a big, well known turbo performance shop that have been around for ages and prepare a lot of tarmac rally cars etc etc. No personal experience with them, but they are pretty close to me so im thinking about giving them a go. Best advise is talk to a few workshops and decide for yourself who you are comfortable using.

Back in Sydney i rated BD4s, top workshop, but others had different opinions, sadly thats how it seems to work in the workshop scene, fans and critics:(

I'm not quite sure how big they are in melb, but i only managed to find a handful of posts mentioning them. I did find this on autospeed.com.au tho:

http://www.autospeed.com.au/cms/A_0726/article.html

Whether or not it's relevant is questionable.... but at least they're doing something in their spare time...

  • 1 month later...
I've been considering this for some time, would be VERY interested to see end results.

Hey guys car's finally done, this is the result:

dyno.jpg

At 15PSI [about 1 bar] The usual case ran outta injectors. Power delivery is great tho. Very happy with the results. Hope this helps any 34 owners.

Nick

Top work mate, thats really helpfull :):D

Got a dyno sheet before hand? What mods are you running (engine, ECU and exhaust etc) You could PM me if you don't want to post them. Cheers!

Looking at the outright power your making it doesn't look to be much higher than a stock turbo but the power curve seems to climb a lot quicker so I'm assuming that it's pretty quick off the mark? How much of a difference would you say?

I'm making around 200kw-205kw on the stock at the moment, I'll try and find a dyno sheet to compare the power curves unless you have one :P

Nah thats just the one. YEa the thing that holding back me achieving more power is the fuel delivery system. Just not enough fuel, have to upgrade the injectors and pump. Probably not going to play around with that just yet as I have no money but a future goal of mine is that.

Previously I got about 188rwkw on my stock turbo at around .95 bar. That was pushing the stocky and i proved that at heathcote, oh well. Kip reckons that this turbo is ok running 230-250rwkw but then again thats after the upgrade.

Ok this is the deal right, off the mark the car seems slower, there is a fairly noticable amount of lag, I HATE IT. It really sucks u into the seat after 3500rpm whereas b4 at 3000. So its about a 600-800 more revs. I do have a dyno sheet with the stock turbo but i'll have to find it.

Mods:

Cat BAck

Front pipe (standard dump and cat)

Frount Mount

PFC (I used letters on purpose)

Boost controller.

Panel Filter

Current Power 206@wheels (highflowed) = Previously 188@wheels (stockturbo)

DOnt know if this is good or bad but hope this helps others.

Nick

off topic surely you can changer your turbo and its not in "epa violation" what rule states you have to use the stock turbo? just like a v8 would change its cams or bore it to out to bigger capacity etc. sure it has to pass emissions and pass the db rating, gas emissions with the probe up the zorst etc etc

but an rb25 with a gt30 or a the stocker turbo surely wont make an ounce of difference for the epa guys. the only way i could see it making a difference is if when they do the probe / emissions tests your controller is set to 1.3 bar and the ecu munges up all the emissions, surely you wouldnt leave it at 1.3 for an epa test?

and even if they do see a nice HKS gt turbo attached how does that mean its worse to the environment that a the stocker garret gt25, also to the fact that the hks turbo is made by garrett anyway

i cant understand why the epa would say "no you cant do that" for a turbo change?

From what I understand any mod in a car that changes the A/F ratio changes the amount of emmissions the car produces. And in order for you to get away with this is to get an engineers cert, which isn't cheap.

The last time I went in there for an inspection which was about 2 months ago they hooked the car up to this little portable device they had. It check a whole heap of things and compared it with the stock settings which that device had stored in its memory.

I dont make the rules but we all have to follow them, no matter how stupid they may seem. I mena look at the ban they have on BOV's, how does that pollute the enviroment? Noise pollution you say, look at all those Harley's,I heavnt heard one that under 120db. The law is the law, what can we do about it, nothing, all we can do is bitch and moan about it to others on forums. LOLZ :)

Thats right, the simple rule is that any modification that changes the consistancy of the gas from the exhaust is a no go unless it's EPA'd and cleared. So change AFR and things like that (with a new bigger turbo as if this wouldn't be done) are all no go's.....so they say :)

On the BOV side of things the reason they recirculate the gas (not air) is to burn off excess vapours etc, if these are vented to atmosphere then thats another EPA no no, it's not the noise that they are worries about.

I'll track down my last dyno sheet and scan it in, would be good to compare the power curve's etc since we have such similar mods and the same power output.

If this thing drives anything like Anthonys car it is bound to be a good thing.

One interesting thing though, for all the ppl that say RB20s are laggy hoes, at 4,500rpm you have a 20rwkw head start:(

AT 4,500rpm 155 vs my 134rwkws:(

But at 5,000rpm i make 198rwkws vs your 170rwkws,

5,500rpm im making 222rwkws vs 180rwkws

6,000rpm im making 205rwkws vs 200rwkws

Youd smash me in the low rpms range, but get the thing on song and they shoudl be pretty even, mmmm interesting:)

ROy, mind me asking what turbo you have?...

Ive got a TD06-20G, essentially a 420hp plain bearing turbo, running about 17psi.

Looking at those dyno results im very suspicous of mine:( No way my car would keep up with Ant95GTRs car, but based on those values youd be excused for thinking my car was half a chance. :confused:

Can I ask how much it ended up costing? I have been quoted significantly more than $1500 for 450hp high flow from GCG and I am located in Melbourne so ATP would be more convenient! Any other comments on the service? I am currently running 195rwkw on the standard turbo at 11psi and the bearings are now very noisy :P

R31 Nismoid, not really looking at the bigger picture. Ok look at it this way, say i still had the stock turbo, and upgraded the fuel sys. The power output probably would be around the same as I have now but who can say how long the turbo would have lasted as it was being pushed already near to its limits. (this is beside the fact that it was blown so i had to make a choice)

But if i upgraded the fuel del sys now I could easly get another 30rwkw on top of what I already have now, safely. So say I had around 230@the wheels, would a gain of about 50rwkw be worth $1500? Plus the best part EPA can't really do much. :D

Halz: yeah i'm pretty happy with the service and turbo i got. Your best bet since Kips is one busy dude down there is to have your own workshop take the turbo off and just bring that to ATP, the job will get done a fair bit quicker. Best thing is to talk to Kip as see what he ask you to do.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I'm looking for some real world experiences/feed back from anyone who has personally ran a EFR7670 with a 1.05 exhaust housing or a .83 I'm leaning towards the .83 because its a street car used mostly for spirited driving in the canyons roads. I"m not looking for big numbers on paper. I want a responsive powerband that will be very linear to 8000 rpm. I dont mind if power remains somewhat flat but dont want power to drop off on top. The turbo I've purchased is a 1.05, although the mounting flange T3 vs T4 and internal vs external waste gates are different on both housings, I not concern about swapping parts or making fabrication mods to get what I want. Based on some of the research I've done with chat gpt, the 1.05 housing seems to be the way to go with slightly more lag and future proofing for more mods but recommends .83 for best response/street car setup. AI doesn't have the same emotions as real people driving a GTR so I think you guys will be able to give me better feed back 😀   
    • Surely somebody has one in VIC. Have you asked at any shops?  Is this the yearly inspection or did you get a canary?
    • This is where I share pain with you, @Duncan. The move to change so many cooling system pieces to plastic is a killer! Plastic end tanks and a few plastic hose flanges on my car's fail after so little time.  Curious about the need for a bigger rad, is that just for long sessions in the summer or because the car generally needs more cooling?
    • So, that is it! It is a pretty expensive process with the ATF costing 50-100 per 5 litres, and a mechanic will probably charge plenty because they don't want to do it. Still, considering how dirty my fluid was at 120,000klm I think it would be worth doing more like every 80,000 to keep the trans happy, they are very expensive to replace. The job is not that hard if you have the specialist tools so you can save a bit of money and do it yourself!
    • OK, onto filling. So I don't really have any pics, but will describe the process as best I can. The USDM workshop manual also covers it from TM-285 onwards. First, make sure the drain plug (17mm) is snug. Not too tight yet because it is coming off again. Note it does have a copper washer that you could replace or anneal (heat up with a blow torch) to seal nicely. Remove the fill plug, which has an inhex (I think it was 6mm but didn't check). Then, screw in the fill fitting, making sure it has a suitable o-ring (mine came without but I think it is meant to be supplied). It is important that you only screw it in hand tight. I didn't get a good pic of it, but the fill plug leads to a tube about 70mm long inside the transmission. This sets the factory level for fluid in the trans (above the join line for the pan!) and will take about 3l to fill. You then need to connect your fluid pump to the fitting via a hose, and pump in whatever amount of fluid you removed (maybe 3 litres, in my case 7 litres). If you put in more than 3l, it will spill out when you remove the fitting, so do quickly and with a drain pan underneath. Once you have pumped in the required amount of clean ATF, you start the engine and run it for 3 minutes to let the fluid circulate. Don't run it longer and if possible check the fluid temp is under 40oC (Ecutek shows Auto Trans Fluid temp now, or you could use an infrared temp gun on the bottom of the pan). The manual stresses the bit about fluid temperature because it expands when hot an might result in an underfil. So from here, the factory manual says to do the "spill and fill" again, and I did. That is, put an oil pan under the drain plug and undo it with a 17mm spanner, then watch your expensive fluid fall back out again, you should get about 3 litres.  Then, put the drain plug back in, pump 3 litres back in through the fill plug with the fitting and pump, disconnect the fill fitting and replace the fill plug, start the car and run for another 3 minutes (making sure the temp is still under 40oC). The manual then asks for a 3rd "spill and fill" just like above. I also did that and so had put 13l in by now.  This time they want you to keep the engine running and run the transmission through R and D (I hope the wheels are still off the ground!) for a while, and allow the trans temp to get to 40oC, then engine off. Finally, back under the car and undo the fill plug to let the overfill drain out; it will stop running when fluid is at the top of the levelling tube. According to the factory, that is job done! Post that, I reconnected the fill fitting and pumped in an extra 0.5l. AMS says 1.5l overfill is safe, but I started with less to see how it goes, I will add another 1.0 litres later if I'm still not happy with the hot shifts.
×
×
  • Create New...