Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Yes thats the car and turbo, not near those figures yet tho unfortunately...:rofl:

Go's ok running 1bar, is line ball with a mates 12.7sec ute so looking forward to what it can do with proper boost control and some tuning

Well not as impressive as mr boostn32's 300rwkw claim, but the red top rb20 made 301rwhp today at 19psi with a nice tune to look after an aging motor. Many thanks to Hyperdrive who have taken the car from being weak as piss (240rwhp at 20psi) to where its at now.

hi, guys check out this gts4 rb20det in www.skylinesdownunder.com

I've been in the car, but not with power it has now, It has everthing done to it. Its been in one of those performance videos from nz pulling really good 1/4 time.

specs from site.

Make: NISSAN

Year/Model: 90 R32GTS-4 2.0ltr

Engine: PORT POLISED HEAD, CUSTOM EXHAUST MANIFOLD ,LAGE TURBO

Induction: CUSTOM INTAKE AND INTERCOOLER

Exhaust: 3 INCH MANDEL BENT STANLESS REAR MUFFER 5 INCH TIP

Drivetrain: 4WD , GTR BOX,4 PUK KEVLAR CERMIC CLUTCH

Body styling: FULL AFTER MARKET KIT VEILSIDE WING

Wheels & Rubber: 18 INCH CHROME ANTERAS WIT 265/35/18 DUNLOPS

R/W kW: 318kw@20psi

Quarter mile time: 11.703@116mph

im running 250lb in my rear with some reasonable bilistein shocks. Not too bad, but i would love to try the 500lb's i have sitting in my room  :D

Harder springs = less traction:cheers:

hi, guys check out this gts4 rb20det in www.skylinesdownunder.com

I've been in the car, but not with power it has now, It has everthing done to it. Its been in one of those performance videos from nz pulling really good 1/4 time.

specs from site.

Make: NISSAN  

Year/Model: 90 R32GTS-4 2.0ltr  

Engine: PORT POLISED HEAD, CUSTOM EXHAUST MANIFOLD ,LAGE TURBO  

Induction: CUSTOM INTAKE AND INTERCOOLER  

Exhaust: 3 INCH MANDEL BENT STANLESS REAR MUFFER 5 INCH TIP  

Drivetrain: 4WD , GTR BOX,4 PUK KEVLAR CERMIC CLUTCH  

Body styling: FULL AFTER MARKET KIT VEILSIDE WING  

Wheels & Rubber: 18 INCH CHROME ANTERAS WIT 265/35/18 DUNLOPS  

R/W kW: 318kw@20psi  

Quarter mile time: 11.703@116mph

11.7 and 116 mph = ~250 rwkw (that's on a roller dyno)

If it is a hub dyno, add 15 rwkw (no wheels or rollers).

265 rhkw (rear hub kilowatts)

Note no mention of camshafts:cheers:

im running 250lb in my rear with some reasonable bilistein shocks. Not too bad, but i would love to try the 500lb's i have sitting in my room  :D

I have 200lb springs in the rear of mine, with good even tyre ware, and really not a lot of squat. Id be looking at the shock setting.

Sydneykid, you stated harder springs equalling less traction. This statement I can understand with a live rear end but with the primitive design ( compared to later models ) of the HR31 IRS, soft springs, especially the standard gear send the rear into enomous negative camber lifting a lot of the rubber off the road.

Many owners have reported success in better traction and faster 1/4 mile times when going to harder rear suspension.

Harder springs = less traction:cheers:

Harder springs = Less Squat = More than 1/3 the tyre touching the ground

Its a fine line with a HR31 IRS... too soft, and you squat so much that i've had 1/3 the tyre only touching the ground from footage... and thats hardly gonna help the problem.

Since i've installed slightly harder bilisteing shocks (over the ones i had) its been noticeably better, not startling... but much better

Just some axle tramp to sort out now

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • 9" wheels are a little too wide for a RWD 32. They can fit. People have put R33 GTR wheels on 32s for years and years. But they are a very tight squeeze. This has been known for about 30 years. As I said - there is no difference between a 17 and an 18 in terms of what will fit. The rolling diameter needs to stay about the same as stock - not very much larger. If you increase that, you will start to have problems. If you increae rolling diamater at the same time as yo increase width, you will have problems earlier. as 9" wheels are pushing the boundaries already, you would need to be careful with tyre choice. I would put 8.5s on the front of mine, but would expect problems with 9s.
    • post up screen shots of your injector tables
    • Diagnostic flow for a code 21 says check signal at the ECU pins, on a voltmeter of some kind it should read 0.1V at idle, 0.12V cranking, 0.15-0.25V at 2000 rpm. Check each coil such that +1, -3 is infinite or very high resistance, -3, +2 should do the same. (-1, +3), (+3, -2), (+1, -2), and (-1, +2) should all be somewhere between 0 ohms and high resistance. If you trace the path from the coil pin all the way back to the ECU in the diagram the resistance you measure at the coil vs connected to the harness should be pretty much the same. 
    • I have an elite 2500 running an adapter harness on an rb25de neo r34. I took the butterfly out and removed all that junk. But I also went Plus+t at the same time. The butterfly thing works in reverse to the boost solenoid on the Gtt if that makes sense
    • yeh they are 235/45/17 up front and 255/40/17 in the rears. I still didn't get my answer if i can fit a 18x9 up front. I want to get 4 of this and see if they will fit before committing as they didn't see an 18x8 as an option but there is a 18x9.5 also.   Enkei RS05-RR 18x9 35mm ET 5x114.3 75.0 Bore Matte Gunmetal Wheel
×
×
  • Create New...