Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I guess all these power gaining mods tend to loose all of the available low end torque our RB20's have hey.

It might be nice to try the cylinder head off of your GTS4 TurboX, but I like the smaller chamber of the DE engine.

Hey Boostn32, is your ride a street RB20 or race only?

Turbine

i have a RB20DET in my s13 but yet to put it on the dyno do any of you guys know what i should expect power wise

RB20DET

VG30DET turbo

SAFC11

Fuel pump

600/300/100 FMIC

Drift zorst 3inch

High flow cat

Boost at 1 Bar

What should i expect with this sut up

I still need a engine management but i am undecided on what to get any suggestions

I guess all these power gaining mods tend to loose all of the available low end torque our RB20's have hey.

It might be nice to try the cylinder head off of your GTS4 TurboX, but I like the smaller chamber of the DE engine.

Hey Boostn32, is your ride a street RB20 or race only?

Turbine

its a Drift car, but will be used on the street as well, but then again i will be drifting it, doing track days and drags, its only a matter of suspension setup to suit what im doing. this car wont be a daily driver, more like a weekend toy and track car.

ok the engine build begins tonight, will add pics as i go. this is the engine im chasing 300rwkw+

Can you tell me what crank you will be using? As you are using the same turbo as me, im interested to know if we can compare our resutls. A std Rb20 vs an RB20 with headowrk, cams etc etc

A quick comparo of some of the setups that have been posted in the sticky thread. I would have put more on, except its hard to retain clairty, thats why i split the boost and power curves as ven when plotted on different Y-Axis, with so many lines it was confusing.

Ans apologies to those i didnt add, its just that i grabbed a few different tubo setups that were dunod using road speed, as i dont have my spreadsheet to change road speed into rpm

But needless to say FATGTS-R is leaving us all for dead at the moment :D Carl H is with him but cant match him until that GT30R leaps onto boost

edited to be all in one plot

RB20_Comparo1.JPG

I dunno if its right, i just hot plot once i entered it into a spreasheet, thoguh lookign at it ...it does look wrong. ill get back to yah...you should be way over us all :P

LOL...fixed now. Just the one plot...only yours was in black so could be seen against the backgraound when i changed the colour from white to black ;)

LOL..its still not right as you can see my boost curve...ill try again alter tonight when i get a minute

ok well i didnt get started as yet, spent all day cleaning parts again and re-checking all the clearances.

Just thought i would add im using a RB26 water pump as the blades are 11mm wide instead of the RB20 that have 8mm wide blades, they bold straight on and reccomend that anyone that is replacing there water pump to use a RB26 one, im also using a RB26 oil pump, not sure if it fits but i will let every one know how it goes

post-12049-1139665748.jpg

roy u have done something funky with the bottom end of the graph

for instance at 95km/hr im making 75rwkw and your making about 80rwkw

but on the comparo graph ur making 160rwkw and im making 120rwkw

i think ur giving the rb20 bottom end a bit too much credit :D

roy u have done something funky with the bottom end of the graph

for instance at 95km/hr im making 75rwkw and your making about 80rwkw

but on the comparo graph ur making 160rwkw and im making 120rwkw

i think ur giving the rb20 bottom end a bit too much credit :(

LOL...farkin spreadsheets :D I was bored at work and trying to do it covertly. Im half pissed and bored at 12.30am in a hotel...ill try again but cant guarantee the result will be any better considering the state im in :D

that 4th gear comparo for road speed to revs...cool, i need my spreadsheet on my laptop to work it out accurately. What sized tyres have you assumed, (tyre circumference)???

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • @Haggerty you still haven't answered my question.  Many things you are saying do not make sense for someone who can tune, yet I would not expect someone who cannot tune to be playing with the things in the ECU that you are.  This process would be a lot quicker to figure out if we can remove user error from the equation. 
    • If as it's stalling, the fuel pressure rises, it's saying there's less vacuum in the intake manifold. This is pretty typical of an engine that is slowing down.   While typically is agree it sounds fuel related, it really sounds fuel/air mixture related. Since the whole system has been refurbished, including injectors, pump, etc, it's likely we've altered how well the system is delivering fuel. If someone before you has messed with the IACV because it needed fiddling with as the fuel system was dieing out, we need to readjust it back. Getting things back to factory spec everywhere, is what's going to help the entire system. So if it idles at 400rpm with no IACV, that needs raising. Getting factory air flow back to normal will help us get everything back in spec, and likely help chase down any other issues. Back on IACV, if the base idle (no IACV plugged in) is too far out, it's a lot harder for the ECU to control idle. The IACV duty cycle causes non linear variations in reality. When I've tuned the idle valves in the past, you need to keep it in a relatively narrow window on aftermarket ecus to stop them doing wild dances. It also means if your base idle is too low, the valve needs to open too much, and then the smallest % change ends up being a huge variation.
    • I guess one thing that might be wrong is the manifold pressure.  It is a constant -5.9 and never moves even under 100% throttle and load.  I would expect it to atleast go to 0 correct?  It's doing this with the OEM MAP as well as the ECU vacuum sensor. When trying to tune the base map under load the crosshairs only climb vertically with RPM, but always in the -5.9 column.
    • AHHHH gotchaa, I'll do that once I am home again. I tried doing the harness with the multimeter but it seems the car needed a jump, there was no power when it was in the "ON" position. Not sure if I should use car battery jump starter or if its because the stuff that has been disconnect the car just does send power.
    • As far as I can tell I have everything properly set in the Haltech software for engine size, injector data, all sensors seem to be reporting proper numbers.  If I change any injector details it doesnt run right.    Changing the base map is having the biggest change in response, im not sure how people are saying it doesnt really matter.  I'm guessing under normal conditions the ECU is able to self adjust and keep everything smooth.   Right now my best performance is happening by lowering the base map just enough to where the ECU us doing short term cut of about 45% to reach the target Lambda of 14.7.  That way when I start putting load on it still has high enough fuel map to not be so lean.  After 2500 rpm I raised the base map to what would be really rich at no load, but still helps with the lean spots on load.  I figure I don't have much reason to be above 2500rpm with no load.  When watching other videos it seems their target is reached much faster than mine.  Mine takes forever to adjust and reach the target. My next few days will be spent making sure timing is good, it was running fine before doing the ECU and DBW swap, but want to verify.  I'll also probably swap in the new injectors I bought as well as a walbro 255 pump.  
×
×
  • Create New...