Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I just got an EPA notice in the mail....

I have an Apexi Power FC

Boost controller

Pod

Exhaust

Im going to put my silencer back in the exhaust and the stock airbox, do i need to put the stock computer back in?

and how do i reconnect the standard boost solenoid? i realise that there are 3 pipes from the standard boost controller and with the bleed valve i am only using 2 2 of them with one blocked off.

So how do i reconnect it for the EPA test? does anyone have any pics of how it is done?

any help is much appreciated..

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/58436-add-me-to-the-epa-list/
Share on other sites

i dont think you have to reconect the standard boost controller, they dont care about your mods only about pollution control, just change your standard computer in and youll be fine, run as little boost as you can and youll pass easy, leave the rest its just a waste of time

it actually depends on the reason u have to go to the EPA...

if its just a noise test u will be ok but a screw in silencer wont pass as they measure without it (screw into the tip that is)

as inark said.... what type of EPA, is it just an exhaust compliance one by the sounds of it.

There is a grave mis-conception about an EPa notice lately. One is nothing more than a waste of 30 mins

Just make the exhaust quieter and go get it tested at an exhaust place licensed to test it.

Dont waste time taking boost controllers off and stuff as thats not what you were EPa'd for and an exhaust shop wont give a shit anyhow

The full inspection is the only time you have to take a fair amount of stuff off (which is unlikely unless a cop pulled you over and went to town on you one night or you've had numerous other EPA notices, which you have not)

This is a first offence but what worries me is that they gave me an appointment to go to the EPA testing centre in Mcleod... Hence why i am asking how to bring the car back to standard.

It is an Air and Noise test the notice states.

Inark: It is just a silencer in the rear muffler with the one srew to secure it, with it in the car is very quiet, so much so that i can bearly hear it so i believe i will be under 90db but i dont know about the legallity of the silencer itself. does it need to be tack welded into place?

I wanted to reconnect the standard boost solenoid just to be sure as it is only a 10 min job but i cant remember the correct way to do so. any ideas?

If the letter suggested you have to go to McLeod for the test, then its a full EPA compliance test.

Therefor, your only allowed ONE intake modification (ie: either a cooler, or pod filter...not both).

No boost controler, no fuel pressure ragulator, no injectors

Basically STOCK

Your silencer plate wont pass...even if you weld the plate in, its no accepted. I know this for fact

You will either have to put the stock exhaust back on (as its close to legal limit as it is) or somehow lower the current system down. Which you probably dont want to do as itll mean resonators/mufflers

Also, dont be sneaky and try to fool the guys up at Mcleod EPA. As they are pretty decentl blokes, they KNOW what to look for especially with Skylines as they get them in on a daily basis

Good Luck

i rang the EPA and was told they will be going over the whole car and as mentioned above, the silencer is illegal however can be welded at the screw but it need to be welded in a way that it cannot be just removed with the tap of a hammer. I suppose it all depends on the tester on the day.

therefore ill leave the front mount and the exhaust but ill have to remove the computer and the boost controller..

Any idea on how to reconnect the standard solenoid?

i had to remove my avcr as well when i got mine tested. I got the boost solenoid removed completely as well as removing the screen. My powerfc was replaced with a stock ecu. They plugged into the diagnostic port to test something and it wouldnt work...so they assumed aftermarket computer. The opened the panel and saw the standard ecu. hehe

[WLDCRD]: if i put the stock ecu in the car and then replace it with the Power FC, does the PFC retain the settings i have or will i have to dyno the car again an tune it again?

from whjat people say, they really know what they are talking about at the EPA testing centre.

anyone have any pics of the stock boost solenoid so i can plug the hoses back up? There are 3 hoses from the standard solenoid, and at the moment with the bleed valve one is blocked, will i have to reconnect it?

']They plugged into the diagnostic port to test something and it wouldnt work...so they assumed aftermarket computer. The opened the panel and saw the standard ecu. hehe

i don't think that they can 'plug something into the diagnostic port' - would they be liable if they fried something? I doubt this is within their 'power'

i certainly wouldn't be letting them do anthing of the sort!

silvar33: powerfc retains all the settings

Ronin 09: yeah they did check it...they go throught near the steering column. They have the plugs! I dont think they alter anything...they just checked.

anyone have any pics of the stock boost solenoid so i can plug the hoses back up? There are 3 hoses from the standard solenoid, and at the moment with the bleed valve one is blocked, will i have to reconnect it?
haha.. I've been shown how to remove and re-fit the AVC-R boost solenoid 3 times and I always forget which hoses go where! Next time someone shows me I think I should be taking notes :rofl:

Thats too bad. To avoid a return trip to EPA and get it sorted in one day you need to do the following;

Apexi PFC - remove, pop in stock ECU.

Boost controller - remove. not allowed because it can change the emissions, even if on stock boost levels

Pod - You are allowed a pod or a FMIC. one or the other not both.

Exhaust - When i go to EPA i have to put on a stock exhaust, my stock Exhaust measured 88dB (stock cat,muffler etc). I've been to EPA and seen guys with exhausts with a baffle plate, they will fail you for 2dB over so save yourself the trouble, get a stock exhaust (can be purchased for $100 roughly, check forums, good investment) and get it bolted on (about $70 from exhaust joint) , or if you want you can do it yourself with a trolley jack...who can be bothered i just pay the $70 and get it done in 30 mins without getting my hands dirty and back/neck sore!

Good luck with it.

']JAPCAB: you can have both pods and front mount if you got a GTR as the fmic is standard and you are allowed one induction mod :)

Not if the intercooler is aftermarket. Standard intercooler and aftermarket pod filters are ok. You can only have aftermarket air filter OR aftermarket intercooler - not both. Personally I think this rule is BULLSHIT, I've got my stock R34 airbox handy just in case I need to swap it over. Although last time I went through a RWC check point they didnt say anything about the 2 induction mods. Maybe cos I'm not on my P's :P

thanks guys...

ill have the car standard apart from the front mount and the exhuast, however i am going to pay the $30 ish for a db test and if it passes ill weld the silencer on as the EPA said this was fine to do so. if it fails ill buy a stock muffler and have them install that.

My only concern in how to reconnect the stock boost solenoid... there are 2 hoses... which 2 are connected together by the T-piece and which one connects to the solenoid on its own? am i right in saying that the hose from the turbo connects to the top of the solenoid and the other 2 hoses are connected together via the T-piece and then to the bottom plug of the solenoid?

I am really desperate for this info as i would assume if it is not connected together it would not meet emissions?

Also, how strict are the emissions? would an R33 GTST with only front mount and full exhaust pass easily?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I know why it happened and I’m embarrassed to say but I was testing the polarity of one of the led bulb to see which side was positive with a 12v battery and that’s when it decided to fry hoping I didn’t damage anything else
    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
×
×
  • Create New...