Jump to content
SAU Community

POWER RESTRICTIONS APPROVED, to be introduced in 2005


78vbsle
 Share

Recommended Posts

Actually it's been in victoria for several years already, doesnt seem to be policed well though.
Stupid thing is, you can learn in one, because a fully licenced driver is "in charge" of the vehicle. All well and good, but who's "in control"? And then, you can drive to the test, and do the test, in one, but (assuming you pass), you can't drive it home!!!!!
from what I know it is based on the factory power to weight ratio of the car, which means as long as your car is under that limit off the factory floor it's legal.

It also appears from what I have been told that you are allowed to modify the car for as much power as you want because the power to weight ratio is only based on the factories power to weight ratio.

Yes, it's based on the power : weight (125 kW / T) (or capacity : weight = 3.5 l / T), ...BUT.... Initially, cars are placed on the list according to the factory spec. But, if you hot up a car not on the list to a point where it exceeds to power : weight (or capacity : weight), then it is also "technically" illegal for a P-plater do drive it. So you stick a 5.7 V8 in a HQ, then it's illegal for a P-plater, even though the stock HQ is legal.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 47
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

im actually quite relieved, i mean no law is gonna stop me driving what i want, but the first year p-platers having the restrictions is a good compromise in my opinion. Its way better than banning everyone under 26 from a fast car.

Im still a strong believer in the view that its the driver, not the car thats at fault scenario. I feel that if someone is a dick behind the wheel, they will do it in any car, no matter the performance of the car. But anyways, a reasonably fair compromise me thinks

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1. I think that my first year driving in a commonwhore v6 taught me alot of valuable lessons without killing me. Having said that I also think (EVLR34) and the WRX on its roof and all the other "P" plate killers have been used by the media to boost (no pun intended) the opinion that all P platers are hoons and they just kill people... Let all think about how many 25-40 year old people we know and how many accidents theyve had??? It happens to the best of us!

2. Has anyone considered that this might just promote young drivers to drive around without there P plates on???

3. Has anyone considered that the new "modified car" section of the legislation gives our friends in bacon blue another excuse to pull us over? Maybe JUST to check that we are not P platers, oh and whilst were here what mods has this got? DEFECT....

I can see many pros and many cons... Certainly not as black and white as some would like to believe!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

so many flaws in many arguments..

a) p plates are not displayed up here in QLD at all.. if a similar thing was introduced in QLD how is a police offer meant to determine the age of the driver, other than pulling over all people with modified cars?

B) so many people in victoria drive with p-plates clearly displayed on cars that are over the existing power/weight limits which have been in place for donkeys. These cars are registered, insured, and driven by those on p-plates even though those cars are "meant" to be illegal to be driven.

c) how do you again, even if p plates are displayed determine which year they are on. In victoria there is no change in the colours over the years.. so pull over *all* p-platers?? (happens anyway, no change there....)

so its all smoke and mirrors and just put it place to appease a few.. it will do so for a while, then its the next thing in 12 months there will be the outcry over whatever is the issue then supposedly is "the" reason for continuing horrific deaths on our roads... and the cycle continues.

its all politicians games in the end.. to be seen to be doing something, when really doing nothing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Seen Graeme Dousset on 7 News tonight in his first interview since the accident, he was criticizing the Carr government over the new restrictions that have just been brought in, he was also angry that he and the other parents had not been a part of the decision making process despite the fact that the government and the media used his son as the catalyst for these reforms.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's just a knee jerk reaction from a jerk premier who has never even held a licence (the Carr surname is just another irony!).

The problem with these types of restrictions is that the people who make and enforce them have no idea about cars and performance.

I remember the hassles I had getting insurance on a Saab 9-3 a few years ago because it had a low pressure (eco friendly) turbo. No matter it only made 110 kw- it had a turbo and I was under 25 so some companies wouldn't even quote.

Introducing these kinds of restrictions just pushes the problem from occuring when drivers are on their P-plates, to when they become a full licenced, but totally inexperienced driver (hey but then it's not a problem and the government and moral crusaders have won their war right?).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share




  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Took a little trip  went to nismo hoping the get my fuel tank hoses and unfortunately they told me they didn’t have stock luckily I was able to go to a Nissan parts store and they were able to order them in for me  then can home and cleaned the tank with some degreaser and fitted the new hoses before putting it back in the car 
    • 100% I’ll hack into the 33. Strap a turbo onto the RB25DE and/or put the 25 head on a 30 block. 33 passed in cos the reserve was too high. I’ll try lowballing it again and negotiate. Aim is to have it landed and on the road for under 15k, then spend the same amount on top in mods.
    • It's generally best practise to run 1x run without VCT enabled, then 1x run enabled till redline. Overlay the two torque graphs and you'll find the desired RPM to turn off VCT. Sometimes, it might be even worthwhile turning off VCT earlier control torque/cylinder pressure and using VCT purely to spool the turbo.
    • They sell them in Malaysia for about $4
    • First time I ever have issues with Amazon, but my wife often tells me to keep an eye out for fakes. It finally got me. I wrapped up the conversation with Gates. The gentlemen I was talking to seemed to hate his job but the response time on their technical support is outstanding. He stated that the hose is marked with some variation of "SAE J30R10" but that if you only purchase a 1 foot length like I did, it is possible to get a cut between markings and have a blank hose. To no ones surprise, he stated the swelling and "gummyness" isn't normal and to replace/buy from somewhere else (He mentioned NAPA). I'll toss a small end of the new one in gas for a few days before pulling the hanger out again, just to be safe.  Hose should arrive Monday. For those running multiple pump in tank hangers, you know the joys of getting them out and back in. I'm surprised I haven't destroyed my level float yet.  Lastly once I wrap all of this up, I'm planning on hitting the dyno again in 2 weeks while I'm on vacation. I realized recently that my VCT is set to turn off at 5000RPM. I'm surprised it wasn't increased while I was on the dyno last. I'm expecting I can increase it to ~6500RPM, if not more. Should hopefully get another 15-20kw out of it. I also want him to revisit my knock thresholds. I'm occasionally getting false knock around 3000rpm. 
×
×
  • Create New...