Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi all,

judging by the amount that came up when i did a search about squeeky brakes, I was quite amazed that so many people have the same funny problems as I do (yeah, random idling and the occasional stall or semi-stall etc).

Here's what was going on:

R33 Gtst

stock brakes

bendix ultimate pads (plenty of grip left)

heaps of squeeking

(making me do some funny braking patterns so as to not make any noise when I'm trying to pull up all tough at the lights... I'm sure many of you know what i'm talking about.... It kinda ruins the cool/mean ass effect if you roll up squeeking like a tram...)

SO: I went to super cheap auto and bought me some of that anti squeek business that you spray onto the back of the brake pads (like pink silly string?!) then 10 mins later put back in place.

WELL: It squeeked again from the moment I drove off a couple of hours later (on the way to the drift battle... those crazy bastards... so entertaining)

It quitened down oh so slightly for the odd ride, but generally keeps sounding like an old vans brakes.

MY QUESTION: (in a very long winded manner)

Backing my brake pads are 2 metal shim thinigs, a darker one that fits snuggly, and a silver metal one that goes about half way down.

With my pink silly string, can I spray in between these metal shimajigies, as to make them grip a bit better together and not rub, hence CUTTING OUT THIS RIDICULOUS SQUEEKING?

I'm hoping this might be ok, since I would keep my silly string away from the brake pot things, but am i doing something which may result in me ending up in a tree?

Cheers,

MR SQUEEKY MOUSE...

(ps. If anyone needs me to translate my dribble (yes, it's 1:40am), pls let me know and i can rephrase my question in one brief question)

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/58938-anti-squeek-on-brakes/
Share on other sites

Hey, what's all this anti-squeel plates business? Do many people have experience with these? If people have actually used these before, do you guys n gals find them effective? And what's different about them compared to the stockies?

(Actually, do all you other people have the same 2 backing plates that I do?)

If I can find a solution to these loud brakes I'll write something up, coz it seems to be a common thing.... hmm..

Try hard braking from high-ish (eg: 70kmh) speed. this is usually done to "bed in" the brake pads when you first get them to get resin off. However, my dads BMW had the loudest sqeals, he took the car up to speed and braked hard as, but not hard enough to activate the ABS. Problem solved.

Madmoo;

If you've read the posts on squeaky f%^king brakes you'll know it can be caused by many things and that the squeal is a harmonic - effectively the brake acts like a bell. In my case retaining DS2500 Ferodo pads and swapping from two to one piece discs solved the problem when nothing else would.

Sorry no experience with Bendix, if they are metal pads then expect some squeal, try some organic stuff - even if you get cheapies from a wrecker to see what happens and this might give you a clue. Don't whatever you do spray the stringy stuff on anything other than the pad backing plate.

You didn't mention the history of this - has it just started, did it coincide with a pad change etc?

Regards

The squeeking started not long after the bendix pads were installed (ultimates). I don't know if the workshop bedded the brakes in or not...

If the discs were machined, would that mean it's kinda like doing things again, and getting to bed the brakes again, to make it match up to the discs?

Back to another part of my question before... do any of you guys know if you have 2 metal shim/plate things behind your disc pads?

The closest one of mine to the pad is dark metal, and the same size as the pad, the other is a shiny metal (steel?) that only covers the top 1/2 or 2/3 or the pad. If you can't quite get the picture of this, when you see the imprint from the disc pot things (whatever they're called, that press the pads... the big round things), the circle shape doesn't quite fit on the shiny metal part, and the rests overlaps onto the darker metal...

My other question that i just thought of is this... when people say "anti squeel shims/pads/something", are they referrring to the backing plate thing behind the brake pad, or the actual brake rotor/disc thinig..?

Thanks for your input....

= }

Oh yeah... GTR32, I have done some reading up on all this squeeky business, and I remember reading about the harmonics and frequencies etc... Any idea what exactly is vibrating? is it the disc, or something in the pad/backing/calliper assembly?

Also, don't worry, i just sprayed my silly string on the back of the pad.....

Actually, that's why i'm wondering about which bit is vibrating etc, coz if it's these plates behind brake pads, then would a tiny amount of silly sting in between help to stop the metal on metal rubbing?

Or maybe that would just make everything stick together and decide not to work, and i'd end up in a pond somewhere....? hmm..

Moo;

the harmonics are in the disc. best way to describe it is to imagine the disc is like a bell. the interference between the pad and the disc sets up a frequency in the disc that we hear as a squeal.

the two plates on the rear of the pad are anti squeal shims designed to damper the harmonics. sometimes they aren't enough.

if you have a combination that is going to squeal, sometimes no amount of machining/bedding will fix it, as i discovered.

sounds to me that the pads are the culprit if the squealing started after fitting them. you might try chamfering the leading and trailing edges of the pad, that sometimes helps. Or as I suggested just get some alternative pads from somewheer and try them to see if you can isolate the problem.

if you stick the 2 shims together they will squeel.....

Fist time I installed ultimates, I stuck the 2 together with the anti squeel brake glue, and they squeeled like a mother ****er.

Then I took them out, peeled all that glue off and glued one shim to the brake pad, and put some on the outside of the smaller shim so it sticks to the pistons.

So the only part where ther WASN'T any glue was between the 2 shims.

Now I am on my 3rd pair of ultimates (as of yesterday) and there has been NO SQUEEL since......

Give that a try...

Also make sure you bed them in properly. I just did 5 really hard stops from 50 km/h, and that was enough...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
    • Nah, that is hella wrong. If I do a simple linear between 150°C (0.407v) and 50°C (2.98v) I get the formula Temperature = -38.8651*voltage + 165.8181 It is perfectly correct at 50 and 150, but it is as much as 20° out in the region of 110°C, because the actual data is significantly non-linear there. It is no more than 4° out down at the lowest temperatures, but is is seriously shit almost everywhere. I cannot believe that the instruction is to do a 2 point linear fit. I would say the method I used previously would have to be better.
    • When I said "wiring diagram", I meant the car's wiring diagram. You need to understand how and when 12V appears on certain wires/terminals, when 0V is allowed to appear on certain wires/terminals (which is the difference between supply side switching, and earth side switching), for the way that the car is supposed to work without the immobiliser. Then you start looking for those voltages in the appropriate places at the appropriate times (ie, relay terminals, ECU terminals, fuel pump terminals, at different ignition switch positions, and at times such as "immediately after switching to ON" and "say, 5-10s after switching to ON". You will find that you are not getting what you need when and where you need it, and because you understand what you need and when, from working through the wiring diagram, you can then likely work out why you're not getting it. And that will lead you to the mess that has been made of the associated wires around the immobiliser. But seriously, there is no way that we will be able to find or lead you to the fault from here. You will have to do it at the car, because it will be something f**ked up, and there are a near infinite number of ways for it to be f**ked up. The wiring diagram will give you wire colours and pin numbers and so you can do continuity testing and voltage/time probing and start to work out what is right and what is wrong. I can only close my eyes and imagine a rat's nest of wiring under the dash. You can actually see and touch it.
    • So I found this: https://www.efihardware.com/temperature-sensor-voltage-calculator I didn't know what the pullup resistor is. So I thought if I used my table of known values I could estimate it by putting a value into the pullup resistor, and this should line up with the voltages I had measured. Eventually I got this table out of it by using 210ohms as the pullup resistor. 180C 0.232V - Predicted 175C 0.254V - Predicted 170C 0.278V - Predicted 165C 0.305V - Predicted 160C 0.336V - Predicted 155C 0.369V - Predicted 150C 0.407V - Predicted 145C 0.448V - Predicted 140C 0.494V - Predicted 135C 0.545V - Predicted 130C 0.603V - Predicted 125C 0.668V - Predicted 120C 0.740V - Predicted 115C 0.817V - Predicted 110C 0.914V - Predicted 105C 1.023V - Predicted 100C 1.15V 90C 1.42V - Predicted 85C 1.59V 80C 1.74V 75C 1.94V 70C 2.10V 65C 2.33V 60C 2.56V 58C 2.68V 57C 2.70V 56C 2.74V 55C 2.78V 54C 2.80V 50C 2.98V 49C 3.06V 47C 3.18V 45C 3.23V 43C 3.36V 40C 3.51V 37C 3.67V 35C 3.75V 30C 4.00V As before, the formula in HPTuners is here: https://www.hptuners.com/documentation/files/VCM-Scanner/Content/vcm_scanner/defining_a_transform.htm?Highlight=defining a transform Specifically: In my case I used 50C and 150C, given the sensor is supposedly for that. Input 1 = 2.98V Output 1 = 50C Input 2 = 0.407V Output 2 = 150C (0.407-2.98) / (150-50) -2.573/100 = -0.02573 2.98/-0.02573 + 47.045 = 50 So the corresponding formula should be: (Input / -0.02573) + 47.045 = Output.   If someone can confirm my math it'd be great. Supposedly you can pick any two pairs of the data to make this formula.
×
×
  • Create New...