Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 120
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

This is the final konnexion kit...THIS IS WHAT I WANT so back off ! haha just kidding

nissan_img_12_a.jpg

nissan_img_12_b.jpg

Very nice indeed, would be keen on getting a mould done :P

Front skirts and rear for ~$1300 without shipping on the final konnexion site. How much would a mould cost all up ??

Wow that looks awesome.

I'd be in for sideskirts. That rear bar with the twin tips looks the goods... I'm loving the twins I wish I could get my hands on a look-alike straight through twin tip muffler for cheap ... ahh :aroused:

Is that $800 copy full kit?

We cant go from having no Cefiros in Aus with a FinalK kit to having a half dozen hahaha. Well atleast mine will be original MUHAHAHAHA.... but if theres a few people wanting to chip in to cover the cost of molding them, and then theyre happy to pay for a good copy and shipping from perth I wont mind.

JK

hehe my ceffy's got DTM style twin tips, so that kit will do me nicely... however timeframes not exactly good, so I'll probably buy a copy off yahoo japan.

  • 2 weeks later...
~2400 shipped (land july 05)

moulds costs ~1600 (2 weeks)

copies ~800 (1-2 days each)

Firstly what is the difference between a mould and a copy ?

Then I might have an idea...i think i misinterpreted this info ;)

konect

i *think* what he means by mould is it costs 1600 to build the mould, like, create the mould to make the copies

and the copies are the product of the mould

i however, am getting my own kit in, and im not saying what it is, cos i know that if you do every one of you mofos wants it too... :-)

but, i give you a clue, imma be making my own rear bar

Obviously as it was my idea, I am up for it aswell. So that leaves 6 more if it is cool with jaik to make a copy from his original.

I think that if 8 people (plus the original) spread across australia had a final k kit we shouldnt be too flooded by them.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I guess one thing that might be wrong is the manifold pressure.  It is a constant -5.9 and never moves even under 100% throttle and load.  I would expect it to atleast go to 0 correct?  It's doing this with the OEM MAP as well as the ECU vacuum sensor. When trying to tune the base map under load the crosshairs only climb vertically with RPM, but always in the -5.9 column.
    • AHHHH gotchaa, I'll do that once I am home again. I tried doing the harness with the multimeter but it seems the car needed a jump, there was no power when it was in the "ON" position. Not sure if I should use car battery jump starter or if its because the stuff that has been disconnect the car just does send power.
    • As far as I can tell I have everything properly set in the Haltech software for engine size, injector data, all sensors seem to be reporting proper numbers.  If I change any injector details it doesnt run right.    Changing the base map is having the biggest change in response, im not sure how people are saying it doesnt really matter.  I'm guessing under normal conditions the ECU is able to self adjust and keep everything smooth.   Right now my best performance is happening by lowering the base map just enough to where the ECU us doing short term cut of about 45% to reach the target Lambda of 14.7.  That way when I start putting load on it still has high enough fuel map to not be so lean.  After 2500 rpm I raised the base map to what would be really rich at no load, but still helps with the lean spots on load.  I figure I don't have much reason to be above 2500rpm with no load.  When watching other videos it seems their target is reached much faster than mine.  Mine takes forever to adjust and reach the target. My next few days will be spent making sure timing is good, it was running fine before doing the ECU and DBW swap, but want to verify.  I'll also probably swap in the new injectors I bought as well as a walbro 255 pump.  
    • It would be different if the sealant hadn't started to peel up with gaps in the glue about ~6cm and bigger in some areas. I would much prefer not having to do the work take them off the car . However, the filler the owner put in the roof rack mount cavities has shrunk and begun to crack on the rail delete panels. I cant trust that to hold off moisture ingress especially where I live. Not only that but I have faded paint on as well as on either side of these panels, so they would need to come off to give the roofline a proper respray. My goal is to get in there and put a healthy amount of epoxy instead of panel filler/bog and potentially skin with carbon fiber. I have 2 spare rolls from an old motorcycle fairing project from a few years back and I think it'd be a nice touch on a black stag.  I've seen some threads where people replace their roof rack delete with a welded in sheet metal part. But has anyone re-worked the roof rails themselves? It seems like there is a lot of volume there to add in some threads and maybe a keyway for a quick(er) release roof rack system. Not afraid to mill something out if I have to. It would be cool to have a cross bar only setup. That way I can keep the sleek roofline that would accept a couple bolts to gain back that extra utility  3D print some snazzy covers to hide the threaded section to be thorough and keep things covered when not using the rack. 
    • Probably not. A workshop grade scantool is my go to for proper Consult interrogation. Any workshop grade tool should do it. Just go to a workshop.
×
×
  • Create New...