Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Thanks for the explanation.  

How much does it affect timing if for example you alter the AFM signal enough to go from 10:1 AFR to say 12:1 between 3000-5000rpm.  Would the timing be changed by more than 3 degrees?  I know the computer alters the timing a lot compared to the base 15deg BTDC...

Jut trying to get a rough idea on the effect of the dfa.

thanks

Sorry Ben, I have no practical experience, the only way to get that would be to drive around with someone strapped under the bonnet with a timing light. I can guess by looking at the Power FC ignition maps from the R34GTT, they are here somewhere in the Datalogit maps.......................

OK, in a few spots in the mid range 4 load points is +5 degrees ignition timing, and 6% less fuel, say an AFR change from 11.3 to 12 to 1.

So if it started to ping (because of the 5 degrees advanced igntion timing) you would have to back off the A/F ratio correction by say 0.2. That means you would end up at 11.8 to 1 instead of 12 to 1 but with only 3 degrees of ignition advance. Maybe that's enough to stop the pinging.

A few load points away it is only 3 degrees and 2.5% injector change for 4 load points.

Hence the problem, it's a big circular compromise.:D

  • Replies 1k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

What Sk wrote...

"As well as making more power, I also leaned out the AFR's to a more fuel economy friendly 14.5 to 1 at the lower rpms (off boost). The standard AFR's were 12 to 1 off boost and went as high as 9 to 1 on boost, not good for power or fuel economy. I would have liked to go a little leaner than 11 to 1, but the ignition timing was getting a bit advanced as I pulled more fuel out of it with the DFA lowering the AFM voltage. It was the usual piggy back compromise, no doubt exacerbated by the standard exhaust, compliance cat and standard intercooler. I could trick the standard ECU just so much, then it would pull ignition timing and dump a whack of fuel in.

My biggest single observation with the Jaycar DFA was how easy it was to get rid of the usual RB25DET power dip around 4,250 rpm. With 100 settings at 128 load points I could fine tune it so easily. There is simply NO DIP, and anyone who has tuned an RB25DET will tell you that is hard to achieve with piggy back controllers."

My question is I'm under the impression that whenever you cruise or accelerate softly it is in closed loop (using o2 sensor reading to try and get back to stoic) ..so how do you know whether you are tuning a closed loop load or not?

You say you had as high as 9:1 on boost. Pulling that back to mid 11s to 12 was that a problem with timing??

You talk about rich and retard happening at fairly low boost levels...but is this the savage cut? What I have experienced is almost what feels like a fuel cut at around 10psi but is there a chance I am gietting it a bit before this where the power is dipping due to retarding of the timing but once enough air sensed will do the rich and retard worse..?

Thanks

My question is I'm under the impression that whenever you cruise or accelerate softly it is in closed loop (using o2 sensor reading to try and get back to stoic) ..so how do you know whether you are tuning a closed loop load or not?

Idle and constant throttle cruise for closed loop. On the dyno it's easy to pick, you change the DFA settings and the A/F ratio readings don't change. Ooops must be in closed loop, toooooo simple.

You say you had as high as 9:1 on boost.  Pulling that back to mid 11s to 12 was that a problem with timing??

Yes, I wanted 12 but could only get to 11.

You talk about rich and retard happening at fairly low boost levels...but is this the savage cut?  

On the 4wd dyno it is like riding a bucking bronco, it sure as hell feels savage.

What I have experienced is almost what feels like a fuel cut at around 10psi but is there a chance I am gietting it a bit before this where the power is dipping due to retarding of the timing but once enough air sensed will do the rich and retard worse..?

I have NEVER EVER seen fuel cut on a Skyline, it would run lean and punch holes in pistons, Nissan aren't that stupid. They just richen it up and retard the timing, that drops the rpm, road speed and hence the load and so the turbo drops boost. There is less airflow, so no more need for R&R. The ECI reverts back to the normal maps and the power climbs again, then there is too much airflow and awaaaaaaaay we go again. You see it on so many R25DET dyn graphs, its either a drop or hold in power for a few hundred rpm, then increasing. Or it's a series of swoops in the power output.

Hope that clarifies:cheers:

Hey Gary. Thanks a lot...

"You see it on so many R25DET dyn graphs, its either a drop or hold in power for a few hundred rpm, then increasing"

So this means that R&R can take the form of a not so severe encounter..

When I get what feels like the cut should I keep my foot down and see if the poer comes back...I'm not sure if is coil related or R&R...?

Hey Gary.  Thanks a lot...

"You see it on so many R25DET dyn graphs, its either a drop or hold in power for a few hundred rpm, then increasing"

So this means that R&R can take the form of a not so severe encounter..

When I get what feels like the cut should I keep my foot down and see if the poer comes back...I'm not sure if is coil related or R&R...?

Yep, test it out. Every car is different, some feel like they are going to curl up and die, others just pause for breath.

Coils, coils, coils, I am sick and tired of hearing about coils. I have NEVER EVER had a problem with an RB coil. Copper spark plugs and the right gap will be fine, as long as the tuning is suitable. If it's too rich causing the missfire, then fix the problem (richness) don't stick a bandaid on it (bigger coils).

:thumbsup:

Hmm. I read somewhere that you think the ECU goes into severe retard if it sees that te mixture is very rich...so is there a few different ways that you can get what appears to be the cut...i.e.

1. from airflow being too high;

and the other

2. from the ECU somehow detecting that the mixture is very rich then retarding the timing...

not sure what sensor would let it know this though.

My coils do have burn marks on the side but no visible cracks and no arcing can be seen.

I have new copper plugs gapped at 0.6mm BKR6E (I think they were). So you think the coils aren't to blame.

Hmm.  I read somewhere that you think the ECU goes into severe retard if it sees that te mixture is very rich...so is there a few different ways that you can get what appears to be the cut...i.e.  

1. from airflow being too high;  

and the other  

2. from the ECU somehow detecting that the mixture is very rich then retarding the timing...

not sure what sensor would let it know this though.

My coils do have burn marks on the side but no visible cracks and no arcing can be seen.  

I have new copper plugs gapped at 0.6mm  BKR6E (I think they were).  So you think the coils aren't to blame.

The ECU KNOWS the A/F ratios are rich because it made them rich. The ECU knows that the injector openning should be 40% at 4,000 rpm with a throttle opening of 85%. But the AFM voltage is at 5 volts, so it goes for 70% injector opening when 55% would have been enough. Hence it KNOWS the A/F ratios are too rich.

Why do the coils have burn marks? Been washing the engine down and driving it without drying out the spark plug wells? That's the most common cause, puddles of water and electricity don't go very well together.

I use BCPR6ES-8 NGK copper spark plugs.

:thumbsup:

If i was to disconnect the o2 sensor while tuning the DFA would i get a better result because the system would not be able to run in closed loop?

Will this have any adverse effects?

Was in nessacery to calibrate the DFA as per the jaycar instructions using the 10k trimpot if you are using it to read 0 to 5v from the AFM?

I have heard sevral opinions on this depending on what your application is. One of the jaycar staff said its not needed if you are only using 0 - 5 volts (afm).

I have read this thread from the first post and have not found either of these questions come up before. so any help would be greatly appreciated.

Last Question!!! Where should i take my car to get dyno'd in sydney?

Thanks :D!!!

Right.  So the Rich and retard really happens at the same time?

Yes and no, as the airflow increases due to mods it moves the standard ECU to other points on the fuel maps. Nissan strategy has always been to provide rich (safe) running. So you most definitely can get rich running (down as low as 9's)without the ignition timing being retarded, other than it would normally be retarded for that extra airflow anyway. Conversely I have never seen retard without rich, unles the fuel pump or injectors have issues at that flow rate.

:D

If i was to disconnect the o2 sensor while tuning the DFA would i get a better result because the system would not be able to run in closed loop?

Nope, as soon as you plug the lambda sensor back in it will go closed loop (as normal) and that will overide what you have programmed.

Will this have any adverse effects?

Other than wasting your time, no.

Was in nessacery to calibrate the DFA as per the jaycar instructions using the 10k trimpot if you are using it to read 0 to 5v from the AFM?
I checked the calibration and it didn't need adjusting. I would still check yours, there are always minor variations in components.
Last Question!!! Where should i take my car to get dyno'd in sydney?
Any dyno shop should be able to do it, there is nothing unusual or tricky about how the DFA functions. It has more load points than an SAFC, other than that the functionality is the same. PM me if you want a personal recommendation.

:D

I installed the iebc into my r32 yesterday, but it only seems to send a maximum voltage of 0.15 volts to the solenoid. It's getting 12V from the ecu, and when i tap the throttle i can see the load points change in view mode.

Before i installed it, I tested the unit by connecting a 12volt battery to it and I could see the voltage to the solenoid change from 0v to 12v.

I'll take a look at it today, but I was wondering if anyone has had a similar problem or perhaps has an idea of what i should be looking for.

Thanks.

G'day all!

i recently purchased the boost controller and hand controller which everyone here is raving about. after reading all that has been writen (almost!), im glad i did buy it. however, all that everyine has writen here means very little to me as i am not very mechanically minded (thankgod im not installing it!!!). is it hard to tune and do you need to have it on a dyno while your doing it or can you have a passenger do it while driving?

Ian - people have, scroll back through the thread.

Frink - You can do it on the road or the dyno. The road should be sufficient apart from legal and practical considerations. Whatever you tune it to for peace of mind it would be recommended to get it on the dyno anyway. And no, it's not hard to tune.

Good luck :)

I installed the iebc into my r32 yesterday, but it only seems to send a maximum voltage of 0.15 volts to the solenoid. It's getting 12V from the ecu, and when i tap the throttle i can see the load points change in view mode.

Before i installed it, I tested the unit by connecting a 12volt battery to it and I could see the voltage to the solenoid change from 0v to 12v.

I'll take a look at it today, but I was wondering if anyone has had a similar problem or perhaps has an idea of what i should be looking for.

Thanks.

The ECU switches earth not active, I suspect you are measuring an earth to earth voltage (0.15 volts). Try measuring the solenoid supply to active and you will find it OK.:)

a question about the boost controller, I dont know if its been answered yet and I dont feel like reading 17 pages at 1am so...

as the boost controller runs off duty cycle, when the ecu detects knock and jacks up the fuel, the boost controller will perform incorrectly due to the higher duty cycle right? what effect would this have and is there a way to counter this?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • See if you can thermal epoxy a heatsink or two onto it?
    • The other problem was one of those "oh shit we are going to die moments". Basically the high spec Q50s have a full electric steering rack, and the povo ones had a regular hydraulic rack with an electric pump.  So couple of laps into session 5 as I came into turn 2 (big run off now, happily), the dash turned into a christmas tree and the steering became super heavy and I went well off. I assumed it was a tyre failure so limped to the pits, but everything was OK. But....the master warning light was still on so I checked the DTCs and saw – C13E6 “Heat Protection”. Yes, that bloody steering rack computer sitting where the oil cooler should be has its own sensors and error logic, and decided I was using the steering wheel too much. I really appreciated the helpful information in the manual (my bold) POSSIBLE CAUSE • Continuing the overloading steering (Sports driving in the circuit etc,) “DATA MONITOR” >> “C/M TEMPERATURE”. The rise of steering force motor internal temperature caused the protection function to operate. This is not a system malfunction. INSPECTION END So, basically the electric motor in the steering rack got to 150c, and it decided to shut down without warning for my safety. Didn't feel safe. Short term I'll see if I can duct some air to that motor (the engine bay is sealed pretty tight). Long term, depending on how often this happens, I'll look into swapping the povo spec electric/hydraulic rack in. While the rack should be fine the power supply to the pump will be a pain and might be best to deal with it when I add a PDM.
    • And finally, 2 problems I really need to sort.  Firstly as Matt said the auto trans is not happy as it gets hot - I couldn't log the temps but the gauge showed 90o. On the first day I took it out back in Feb, because the coolant was getting hot I never got to any auto trans issues; but on this day by late session 3 and then really clearly in 4 and 5 as it got hotter it just would not shift up. You can hear the issue really clearly at 12:55 and 16:20 on the vid. So the good news is, literally this week Ecutek finally released tuning for the jatco 7 speed. I'll have a chat to Racebox and see what they can do electrically to keep it cooler and to get the gears, if anything. That will likely take some R&D and can only really happen on track as it never gets even warm with road use. I've also picked up some eye wateringly expensive Redline D6 ATF to try, it had the highest viscosity I could find at 100o so we will see if that helps (just waiting for some oil pan gaskets so I can change it properly). If neither of those work I need to remove the coolant/trans interwarmer and the radiator cooler and go to an external cooler....somewhere.....(goodbye washer reservoir?), and if that fails give up on this mad idea and wait for Nissan to release the manual 400R
    • So, what else.... Power. I don't know what it is making because I haven't done a post tune dyno run yet; I will when I get a chance. It was 240rwkw dead stock. Conclusion from the day....it does not need a single kw more until I sort some other stuff. It comes on so hard that I could hear the twin N1 turbos on the R32 crying, and I just can't use what it has around a tight track with the current setup. Brakes. They are perfect. Hit them hard all day and they never felt like having an issue; you can see in the video we were making ground on much lighter cars on better tyres under brakes. They are standard (red sport) calipers, standard size discs in DBA5000 2 piece, Winmax pads and Motul RBF600 fluid, all from Matty at Racebrakes Sydney. Keeping in mind the car is more powerful than my R32 and weighs 1780, he clearly knows his shit. Suspension. This is one of the first areas I need to change. It has electronically controlled dampers from factory, but everything is just way too soft for track work even on the hardest setting (it is nice when hustling on country roads though). In particular it rolls into oversteer mid corner and pitches too much under hard braking so it becomes unstable eg in the turn 1 kink I need to brake early, turn through the kink then brake again so I don't pirouette like an AE86. I need to get some decent shocks with matched springs and sway bars ASAP, even if it is just a v1 setup until I work out a proper race/rally setup later. Tyres. I am running Yoko A052 in 235/45/18 all round, because that was what I could get in approximately the right height on wheels I had in the shed (Rays/Nismo 18x8 off the old Leaf actually!). As track tyres they are pretty poor; I note GTSBoy recently posted a porker comparo video including them where they were about the same as AD09.....that is nothing like a top line track tyre. I'll start getting that sorted but realistically I should get proper sized wheels first (likely 9.5 +38 front and 11 +55 at the rear, so a custom order, and I can't rotate them like the R32), then work out what the best tyre option is. BTW on that, Targa Tas had gone to road tyres instead of semi slicks now so that is a whole other world of choices to sort. Diff. This is the other thing that urgently needs to be addressed. It left massive 1s out of the fish hook all day, even when I was trying not too (you can also hear it reving on the video, and see the RPM rising too fast compared to speed in the data). It has an open diff that Infiniti optimistically called a B-LSD for "Brake Limited Slip Diff". It does good straight line standing start 11s but it is woeful on the track. Nismo seem to make a 2 way for it.
    • Also, I logged some data from the ECU for each session (mostly oil pressures and various temps, but also speed, revs etc, can't believe I forgot accelerator position). The Ecutek data loads nicely to datazap, I got good data from sessions 2, 3 and 4: https://datazap.me/u/duncanhandleyhgeconsultingcomau/250813-wakefield-session-2?log=0&data=7 https://datazap.me/u/duncanhandleyhgeconsultingcomau/250813-wakefield-session-3?log=0&data=6 https://datazap.me/u/duncanhandleyhgeconsultingcomau/250813-wakefield-session-4?log=0&data=6 Each session is cut into 3 files but loaded together, you can change between them in the top left. As the test sessions are mostly about the car, not me, I basically start by checking the oil pressure (good, or at least consistent all day). These have an electrically controlled oil pump which targets 25psi(!) at low load and 50 at high. I'm running a much thicker oil than recommended by nissan (they said 0w20, I'm running 10w40) so its a little higher. The main thing is that it doesn't drop too far, eg in the long left hand fish hook, or under brakes so I know I'm not getting oil surge. Good start. Then Oil and Coolant temp, plus intercooler and intake temps, like this: Keeping in mind ambient was about 5o at session 2, I'd say the oil temp is good. The coolant temp as OK but a big worry for hot days (it was getting to 110 back in Feb when it was 35o) so I need to keep addressing that. The water to air intercooler is working totally backwards where we get 5o air in the intake, squish/warm it in the turbos (unknown temp) then run it through the intercoolers which are say 65o max in this case, then the result is 20o air into the engine......the day was too atypical to draw a conclusion on that I think, in the united states of freedom they do a lot of upsizing the intercooler and heat exchanger cores to get those temps down but they were OK this time. The other interesting (but not concerning) part for me was the turbo speed vs boost graph: I circled an example from the main straight. With the tune boost peaks at around 18psi but it deliberately drops to about 14psi at redline because the turbos are tiny - they choke at high revs and just create more heat than power if you run them hard all the way. But you can also see the turbo speed at the same time; it raises from about 180,000rpm to 210,000rpm which the boost falls....imagine the turbine speed if they held 18psi to redline. The wastegates are electrically controlled so there is a heap of logic about boost target, actual boost, delta etc etc but it all seems to work well
×
×
  • Create New...