Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Anybody know what size the standard front pipe is on a R33 RB25DET?

Is it 2.5" - 63mm??

Anybody had good results with just changing the front pipe to 2.75 or 3"?

Or is the dump pipe section still a fair restriction?

Some firms sell just the front pipe. I can get a cheap front pipe or get one from the turbo back from Batmbl on these forums,.

Thanks

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/62276-front-pipe-size-standard/
Share on other sites

Anybody know what size the standard front pipe is on a R33 RB25DET?

Is it 2.5" - 63mm??

Anybody had good results with just changing the front pipe to 2.75 or 3"?  

Or is the dump pipe section still a fair restriction?

Some firms sell just the front pipe.  I can get a cheap front pipe or get one from the turbo back from Batmbl on these forums,.

Thanks

bummp

Thanks Jun - point taken about the half job.

I really don't want any noticeable increase in noise, currently 3.5" cat back but fairly quiet. I was wondering whether just the front pipe maybe good trade off between power and sound..i..e will the full 3" dump/froont increase the noise level?

I've had a 3.5" Front pipe, 3.5" Cat-back (TRUST System)

And have recently put on a 3" split-style stainless dump pipe - and by god it certainly howls on boost now, quicker spool up, and an awesome sound - so yes, just the dump makes quite a bit more noise :P

i added that a combined 3in front/dump in mild steel and hiflow cat after running with just a japanese cat and the increase in noise wasnt that noticable . certainly nothing like adding the cat back vs the stock catback . on high throttle the midrange was a bit more growly but not heaps louder or droney

Its probrely cheaper to go the full 3" from turbo to cat - one piece. $380 for JustJap I think.

It's not work doing half the job, becuase you'll still have restriction their.

The air flow will go somthing like this:

Out of the engine through exhaust housing on turbo into big 3" dump then into small 2" - 2.5" or what ever size they are standard then back into 3" you get the idea. So its still got a restriction their and that little bit of pipe thats smaller than the rest does make a fair big difference performance wise. If you want to make you'r exhaust more quiet, Put another resonator on their.

Making any change to you'r exhaust - from standard to aftermarket, you will get a little more sound to you'r exhaust note, but nothing drastic.

:P

Jun

Hey Arkon - did you notice much power gain?? I've got a 4 door like yours :)

I'm thinking if I fit in and find it too noisy I might put on a standard cat back and sell my cat back...although I would have to source the standard cat back.

The dump/front alone would be more of a gain than the catback right? Is the standard cat back that restrictive?

turbo to cat - batmbl does them on these forums for 250...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • From my youth: GTi-R clutch change is a massive pain. The gearboxes are fragile? But the car is super cool and I want one 😢 
    • Remember this is 1988 tech.
    • Driveline vibration is resolved. I ended up loosening all my engine mount and trans mount bolts, giving it a good shake then retightening everything and it's gone... Let's just say I was surprised that fixed it.  I've been happily driving it around again but unfortunately put zero time into my direct port/constant pressure WMI setup. I'm on vacation next week, so I'll try and finalize it then.  On a different note, I spent all week fuel/ignition mapping 2x 216L V16 engines. Turbo's were burning glycol and we swapped them out for larger units. We also had planned emissions testing on site, so I figured I'd be there the same week to use their instrumentation and massage any emissions issues out if needed. This was a first for me. Fuel management is similar in certain ways to automotive (i.e air density as load variable) but very different in others. It's all PLC based and AFR's are controlled by air and not fuel. They use a control valve between the turbo and air manifold to control pressure which in turn controls AFR's. Due to this, target AFR tables supplied by the OEM are in pressures and not mass which really through me off. They use air pressure vs fuel pressure tables. I also relied on an O2 concentration sensor the emissions team had in the exhaust. Ignition timing was also all over the place and we were losing a fair bit of power. They're now happily sitting at 16-40BTDC depending on load. We were making about 1600kw at 900rpm at 90% load. Engines were running a lot smoother as well.    
    • heh, aint no R32 ever meeting modern targa cage rules unless the driver is veeeery short OP, good luck with the sale, since its already in the land of freedom I'm sure you will find a good buyer.
    • meh, it was a good video, clear about the issue and how he dealt with it. A bit heavy on the RTV and very brave to put an RB in anything without rebuilding it first, but otherwise I thought it was good Dose, I'm not sure that having the pickup forward is a big issue; yes of course the oil could shift under brakes but the sump should never be empty enough for that to be a problem (unless you also have a higher volume oil pump, and that oil can't return from the head to the sump quickly enough)
×
×
  • Create New...