Jump to content
SAU Community

Automatic Transmission Shift Kit. - Updated Oct 2006


Recommended Posts

i went to an automatic specialist in melbourne and they suggested to get a second standard trans oil cooler and link them together.

he suggested this b/c he believes that it'll do the same job as a replacement trans oil cooler; for lower cost.

i dont know how true this would be; but sounds reasonable to me.....?

My kit finally arrived today , sheezz Ausie Post had me worried... near on two weeks from Adelaide to Townsville.

Anyway, the next dilemma now, trying to get a filter service kit locally..... was told it was no probs so i didnt get mike to send one.... and after ringing a few auto places ...none..... ring Nissan and part way thru the convo, after asking for an "auto" filter service kit, he asks me if its a manual......... Sheezzz No.2 .... So i said, look dont worry about it ..... :D

Sigh, if i can get one its going in tomorrow night..... but i know my luck..... Either way i should be able to drag it again this sat to see the difference.

Gary

Installed the kit tonight, i pity you guys who did it on the ground !!! Hoist is magic, add a height adjustable oil catch, and its alot less messy, although still some.

Works fine, pretty smooth at light throttle... in some instances its nicer than before , due to not having a factory comp , it was surging abit anyhow.

Anyway , happy with it.

Gary

  • 3 weeks later...

Ive had the shift kit in for awhile now, must say it still works great, but now the gearbox is developping this rattle on D and idle, which Im assuming can't be good. But everything still works, so Im starting to wonder whats the next step I could take to strengthen the auto. I remember reading in ZOOM about their project 11sec Auto R33 having Kevlar clutches from MV automatic, anyone have an idea on the subject?

  • 2 weeks later...
Ive had the shift kit in for awhile now, must say it still works great, but now the gearbox is developping this rattle on D and idle, which Im assuming can't be good. But everything still works, so Im starting to wonder whats the next step I could take to strengthen the auto. I remember reading in ZOOM about their project 11sec Auto R33 having Kevlar clutches from MV automatic, anyone have an idea on the subject?

That's what I got with my full rebuild. About $3k from memory but that included a rebuilt stally too.

How did you do Abo Bob? did you send your gearbox to MV automatics? or did you get them to send you the parts and you found someone in NSW to install them for you?

How does the new stall converter feel around town?

I had to send them the whole box.

The converter is ok. Not really much different.

One problem is that the overun clutch isn't engaging in second gear. Mike says this is probably because of too much line pressure and I might have to send the valvebody back to him to wind it back a touch. That's going to suck.

It's nice and tough now but the problem I'm getting is that when I change gears the ECU drops the timing to take it easy on the box but since it changes so quick now and doesn't need that timing drop it's taking time to spool the torque converter back up and I think I'm losing a bit of boost too which can't then get back up until the torque converter has spooled putting a load on the engine.

End result is that with 190rwkw and stock box I ran 13.8@99 and with new box and 230rwkw I could only get 13.5@103. On one run I short changed 1st gear which resulted in something like (I can't remember exactly) 13.8@107.

  • 4 months later...

abo bob what stall speed did they set it too ? I've just got my hiflow done and also the suspension kit from sydneykids GB, so its all going in soon as i get time. only thing else i can think to do then is a stall upgrade.... about 3000 would be nice , maybe a tad more. i can get to about 2200 now and then wheels start turning. The only premise is that the lock up has to still work, as i dont want to be slipping that much more when crusing.

Does your lockup work good still ?

Gary

yeah that is my big concern too - slipping whilst cruising = terrible fuel economy. I can stall mine up to about the same - 2,200 before the rears light up. I can actually get a pretty good launch at those sort of revs - so I am not convinced I want to make the stall any higher.

Also, over 3,000prm you would be making too much power/torque (I would think) - and would you ever be able to get any decent traction off the line when launching hard?

Since Bob's trans blew, I have actually been second guessing even doing the t/b upgrade. But when I chatted with Mike he said it was a great idea, and Guy (4_door_sleeper) has had his done and raves about it every time I see him :rofl: .... I don't know - decisions, decisions ....

One thing I don't quite understand is that the stall speed stock was theoretically 1500rpm but it plainly does not stall at those revs. Mine is supposedly 1800 so treat this information as relative to itself only.

I have noticed that mine locks and unlocks a lot more than it used to although fuel economy is the same as it ever was even though I've gone from 189rwkw to 255rwkw. It doesn't unlock on cruise per se, just say you are cruising at 60km/h and then hit a slight incline it will unlock. To be expected really. It's kind of like having extra gears in between.

You wouldn't have too much power with a higher stally, just need better tyres.

The Valvebody upgrade (I think that's what you meant) is good because it will keep things cooler when shifting. I suggest you get a temperature gauge for your auto so you know what it's doing. I have just done this and it has given me a much greater appreciation of what is going on in there.

I spoke to mike the other day about a new group buy for torque converters. He told me that a 2800rpm stall would be a good street level unit (foot on the brake and you should be able to push the stall out to 3200rpm) that is drivable at 60kmhr.

He will do a group discount again for us, but he may need to get a few satandard torque converters in first as in the past he has modified them as they come out of the car, and this would result in a slower turn around.

I will post more later.

Abo Bob - have you thought about putting a PFC in the car and trying that, as you said you dont meed the ignition to retard on gear changes anymore, so why use the auto ecu? (you could even try a stock manual ecu in the car)

  • 2 weeks later...

I'd be keen for a 2800 rpm stall (3200 actual) . So long as the lockup still works no probs... that would be perfect !

Gary

yep I'm keen to do this when I do the v/b upgrade

Edited by Nightcrawler

seeing as theres been quite a few ppl have done this valve body assembly upgrade, im finally ready to do it myself.

along with the upgrade, i need to get another standard transmission oil cooler.

if anyone has upgrade to a bigger trans oil cooler, can i please buy ur old standard one?

if u're interstate, im willing to pay for postage to melbourne. PM me if anyone wants to get rid of an unwanted part!

thanks guys!

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
    • You don't have an R34 service manual for the body do you? Have found plenty for the engine and drivetrain but nothing else
×
×
  • Create New...