Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hey there people!

I was in All American today and saw this awesome looking R32 GTR for sale!

It was originally from Vic & Qld, and had a write up in the HPI magazine No 40. Number plate was BNR - 32. It had 430kW and has had little more mods done to it since.

Her are the specs:

Vielside Evo (Blister) Widebody kit,

Panasport 17x10 17x12 G7 C5C2 Rims

Dunlop Sport 275/40 315/30 typres

Trust T88-34D Turbo kit wit ext wastegate & manifold etc

Hks 1000cc injectors

Hks Oil Cooler

Apexi PFC wit hand controller

Splitfire Ignition Coils

Os Giken Triple Plate

Kaaz rear diff

Hks GT bar & plate Intercooler

Field Torque split controller

Defi BF Boost gauge, exhaust temp gauge

Veilside steering wheel

Apexi N1 Coil over Sus.

Veilside Exhaust

N1 Headlights

Grex twin remote oil oil filter rellocation kit

coolant swirl pot

Hks Cam gears

Twin gauge pillar pod on dash.

greddy twin inlet pipe for turbo

Trust Airnx air filters

Z32 air flow meters

Trust gear knob

Nismo 320Kph dash.

Pioneer in dash touch screen DVD player

Clarion 12" sub with amp

Car has made 480hp @ 4 wheels at 1.2 bar of boost.

Don't know if these figures are correct, but anyway.

He is asking $69,999 for it!!

Go check it out, worth a look!

Pulp.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/63088-519rwhp-r32-gtr-for-sale/
Share on other sites

Yeah seem a bit expensive but I think devil's right, I think maybe a limited model.

Devil, I think he did actually! I love Mustangs myself, fastback 65 model is what I'm after.

Although I think the 56 Corvette! Spider model maybe? is the best looking one! Same as the one in True Lies with Arnold & Jamie Lee Curtis.

Holy Crap!!!! Price has jumped up 20g's since Nathan tried to sell it!!!! ha ha ha ha And considering it didn't sell at 52k what makes ya think it'll sell at 70k???????

What a rip.. Also remember that the engine is still stock internals so for 70k thats f*cking stupid... The motor that was in it in the HPI feature was taken out before it came over here...

Holy Crap!!!!   Price has jumped up 20g's since Nathan tried to sell it!!!!  ha ha ha ha  And considering it didn't sell at 52k what makes ya think it'll sell at 70k???????

What a rip..     Also remember that the engine is still stock internals so for 70k thats f*cking stupid...   The motor that was in it in the HPI feature was taken out before it came over here...

OHHHH! it was taken out hey? Well then, that's just shite! Definately not worth it then! So do you think it really has 519rwhp?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
    • I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
    • You are all good then, I didn't realise the port was in a part you can (have!) remove. Just pull the broken part out, clean it and the threads should be fine. Yes, the whole point about remote mounting is it takes almost all of the vibration out via the flexible hose. You just need a convenient chassis point and a cable tie or 3.
×
×
  • Create New...