Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

For a while I've had a the following turbo:

- CHRA GT30/40 (61/82mm "600HP" comp wheel and 60/55mm exhaust)

- Machined out 0.60A/R comp cover (don't know which type, as in T04E etc etc)

- 0.63A/R "Cosworth" internal gate turbine housing

I'd like help with identifying my comp cover (pic attached). Thanks in advance.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/64423-compressor-cover-id/
Share on other sites

Its a T04B probably .60 ARR compressor cover . Way way too small for a GT40 compressor wheel . I'd like to see the "Cosworth .63 AR "Turbine housing . If its off the TA34 (wrongly called T3/T04E hybrid , a phrase coined by turbonetics) fitted std to the RS500 sierra , it can't work properly . The TA34 turbines had much less tip height than GT BB anything . If it was re-profiled (the turbine housing ) it is now junk . Why anyone would want to use these housings on a GT3040R CHRA is beyond me .

Firstly the GT3040R is not an ideal match .

Secondly the GARRETT integral gate exhaust housing kills the efficiency of the UHP GT30 turbine , leading to excessive turbine inlet or back pressure .

Thirdly the T04B compressor cover kills the efficiency and chokes to death the GT40 compressor .

You must remember that Area to Radius Ratios (ARR's) for turbine and compressor housings is worked out based on the original (native) wheels diameter . GT40 compressor wheels (82 or 88mm) generally use T04S comp covers which are huge compared to T04B's .

The individual who built that turbo has little idea or respect for how turbochargers work . Smaller GT30R's with the correct housings could make more power and have far better transient response than that thing .

Also note that the RS500 Sierras were a dog on the road and track , they had all or nothing power delivery and plenty of cheat components . For starters the turbine housings were extrude honed which enlarged the volute and ARR ratio . There were some illegal (larger) turbine housings as well . In a vain effort to chase RB26DETT power they were allowed external gates to control boost . No way the integral could bypass enough gass to allow 500hp from 2L (122 Cu in .) .

Do not attempt to emulate this turbo as a well set up GT30R is better all round .

The TA34's were the end of the road for bush bearing turbos , the GT's eat them .

Apart from that you think it's great..... :P Seriously, thanks for the input.

Photo of turbine end attached. I had the dodgy looking turbine back plate machined flush so that at least the turbine and wastegate flow was unrestricted.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Hi, SteveL Thank you very much for your reply, you seem to be the only person on the net who has come up with a definitive answer for which I am grateful. The "Leak" was more by way of wet bubbles when the pedal was depressed hard by a buddy while trying to gey a decent pedal when bleeding the system having fitted the rebuilt BM50 back in the car, which now makes perfect sense. A bit of a shame having just rebuilt my BM50, I did not touch the proportioning valve side of things, the BM50 was leaking from the primary piston seal and fluid was running down the the Brake booster hence the need to rebuild, I had never noticed any fluid leaking from that hole previously it only started when I refitted it to the car. The brake lines in the photo are "Kunifer" which is a Copper/Nickel alloy brake pipe, but are only the ones I use to bench bleed Master cylinders, they are perfectly legal to use on vehicles here in the UK, however the lines on the car are PVF coated steel. Thanks again for clearing this up for me, a purchase of a new BMC appears to be on the cards, I have been looking at various options in case my BM50 was not repairable and have looked at the HFM BM57 which I understand is manufactured in Australia.  
    • Well the install is officially done. Filled with fluid and bled it today, but didn't get a chance to take it on a test drive. I'll throw some final pics of the lines and whatnot but you can definitely install a DMAX rack in an R33 with pretty minor mods. I think the only other thing I had to do that isn't documented here is grind a bit of the larger banjo fitting to get it to clear since the banjos are grouped much tighter on the DMAX rack. Also the dust boots from a R33 do not fit either fyi, so if you end up doing this install for whatever reason you'll need to grab those too. One caveat with buying the S15 dust boots however is that the clamps are too small to fit on the R33 inner tie rod since they're much thicker so keep the old clamps around. The boots also twist a bit when adjusting toe but it's not a big deal. No issues or leaks so far, steering feels good and it looks like there's a bit more lock now than I had before. Getting an alignment on Saturday so I'll see how it feels then but seems like it'll be good to go       
    • I don't get in here much anymore but I can help you with this.   The hole is a vent (air relief) for the brake proportioning valve, which is built into the master cylinder.    The bad news is that if brake fluid is leaking from that hole then it's getting past the proportioning valve seals.   The really bad news is that no spare parts are available for the proportioning valve either from Nissan or after market.     It's a bit of a PITA getting the proportioning valve out of the master cylinder body anyway but, fortunately, leaks from that area are rare in my experience. BTW, if those are copper (as such) brake lines you should get rid of them.    Bundy (steel) tube is a far better choice (and legal  in Australia - if that's where you are).
×
×
  • Create New...