Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

like him i had signature that stuffed up the viewing for some people on here but i wasnt aware due view being ok for me , an i idea might be to politely ask the person with that signature to resize it or to let a moderator know so they can advise of them to do so.

like him i had signature that stuffed up the viewing for some people on here but i wasnt aware due view being ok for me , an i idea might be to politely ask the person with that signature to resize it or to let a moderator know so they can advise them to do so.

I think it should be limited too. Both dimensions (400 pixels max width) and file size. Makes it hard for 56k users. Not all people know you can turn them off either. Personally I think it's a curtious thing for the users to have a decent sized image.

When I join a bored it's the first thing I turn off. Unfortunatly many people go "see my sig" for a lot of things. So you miss alot.

  • 2 weeks later...

i remember this arguement from ages ago...we were trying to decide whether we should allow pics at all, and we decided yes but to limit the size.

so to answer your question, yes there is a limit...and it's up to the mods at their discretion to ask ppl to reduce them if they think it's too big.

you guys can help us out by sending one of us a pm if you spot one...

and i agree with Shane, having to scroll side to side is a pain in the ass :P

His sig is a link to a commercial website. Surely that shouldn't be allowed unless he's a forum sponsor?

Why pay for a banner if you can just put it in your sig and postwhore? :)

Just increase your desktop resolution.  Im running 1600x1200 and no need to complain. LuKaS's signature looks normaled siezed to me

you sig fills my whole screen.

i use hi-res @ work. but at home i like something easy on my eyes.

and pages long sigs aint one of those easy things

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Latest Posts

    • Hey crew, Failed my WOF cause of a lower control arm, and I've decided to hit both arms, and also the compression rods at the same time(seems they're gonna be the most likely upcoming failure points from some discussions with the lads over on the G35 reddit). I've looking at these form Z1:  https://www.z1motorsports.com/front-suspension/hayaku-automotive/hayaku-g35-front-compression-rod-p-40716.html https://www.z1motorsports.com/front-suspension/hayaku-automotive/hayaku-g35-front-lower-control-arm-p-40674.html I asked Z1 if they'd work as it's the same platform, just RHD vs LHD. I basically got told "Lol dunno". Specifically they aren't aware of any difference but can't guarantee fitment as they haven't done it on a 350GT. So guess I'm asking is if there is any issues with using 2005 G35 coupe suspension parts on a 2005 350GT coupe? Orginally I thought it could be something in the way of the arms that each control arm is designed to be positioned around, but that'd be an engineering nightmare for Nissan needing two different shaped control arms 😅
    • ^ This. The mode door actuator is a common failure, as is the actuator and/or the actual valve for the coolant flow control valve. I also don't know how available the mode door actuator is these days. I've been meaning to look into it and get one from wherever is possible, to keep in the shed for the rainy day when mine eventually fails. Anyway, the advice to you is to search the usual NOS part supply places, or even just go to Nissan and see what they list.
    • Have you got a pic of the actuator? My guess is that unit has failed internally and was flopping around, so the previous engineer who owned it forced it to be fully open to cold air (blocking the heater core path). As far as you can tell, is anything else wrong in the system? Likely you just need a new actuator (not sure how available they are) and then "installation is the reverse of disassembly"
    • I'm happy with the Lsailt unit that I put in, it puts full Android on the top screen so you can run whatever Nav and other Apps you want, while still existing inside the factory functionality like automatic reverse cams, audio input switching, retains factory bluetooth etc. Not cheap and the install was moderate (not simple, not hard) Yours is a V36 not V37 though right?
    • Yeap, all the NC's that I originally looked at that had a hard top were PRHT, which makes the roof line look horrible, hence why I said nope to them My only caveat for another MX5 was it needed to have a hard top, and initially I didn't think you could get a detachable hard top for the NC,  like my NB had Again, a big thanks to Matty for helping me source the detachable hard top for my little girl, they are as rare as hens teeth in Australia, and the few people who have them, keep them Also to Greg, for initially pointing me in the NC direction NC PRHT 🤢🤮 Not mine (I really should take more photos of my car), but a NC with the detachable hard top 😁 To me, the difference in how the detachable hard top roof line looks, and how it actually follows the bodies lines, like they do on NA's and NB's, is chalk and cheese compared to the bulbous looking PRHT  
×
×
  • Create New...