Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

like him i had signature that stuffed up the viewing for some people on here but i wasnt aware due view being ok for me , an i idea might be to politely ask the person with that signature to resize it or to let a moderator know so they can advise of them to do so.

like him i had signature that stuffed up the viewing for some people on here but i wasnt aware due view being ok for me , an i idea might be to politely ask the person with that signature to resize it or to let a moderator know so they can advise them to do so.

I think it should be limited too. Both dimensions (400 pixels max width) and file size. Makes it hard for 56k users. Not all people know you can turn them off either. Personally I think it's a curtious thing for the users to have a decent sized image.

When I join a bored it's the first thing I turn off. Unfortunatly many people go "see my sig" for a lot of things. So you miss alot.

  • 2 weeks later...

i remember this arguement from ages ago...we were trying to decide whether we should allow pics at all, and we decided yes but to limit the size.

so to answer your question, yes there is a limit...and it's up to the mods at their discretion to ask ppl to reduce them if they think it's too big.

you guys can help us out by sending one of us a pm if you spot one...

and i agree with Shane, having to scroll side to side is a pain in the ass :P

His sig is a link to a commercial website. Surely that shouldn't be allowed unless he's a forum sponsor?

Why pay for a banner if you can just put it in your sig and postwhore? :)

Just increase your desktop resolution.  Im running 1600x1200 and no need to complain. LuKaS's signature looks normaled siezed to me

you sig fills my whole screen.

i use hi-res @ work. but at home i like something easy on my eyes.

and pages long sigs aint one of those easy things

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Latest Posts

    • Nah. You need 2x taps for anything that you cannot pass the tap all the way through. And even then, there's a point in response to the above which I will come back to. The 2x taps are 1x tapered for starting, and 1x plug tap for working to the bottom of blind holes. That block's port is effectively a blind hole from the perspective of the tap. The tapered tap/tapered thread response. You don't ever leave a female hole tapered. They are supposed to be parallel, hence the wide section of a tapered tap being parallel, the existince of plug taps, etc. The male is tapered so that it will eventually get too fat for the female thread, and yes, there is some risk if the tapped length of the female hole doesn't offer enough threads, that it will not lock up very nicely. But you can always buzz off the extra length on the male thread, and the tape is very good at adding bulk to the joint.
    • Nice....looking forward to that update
    • Neg, the top one is actually for the front. The sizes are 18x10.5 +18 and 18x11 +32.   I measured many times but I'm sure I'll have problems as this is the thread for problems.
    • Just one thing; tapping tapered threads is tricky. Taps are always tapered and you would generally run it as far as you can, but with a tapered thread you have to stop much sooner otherwise the wide part of the taper will run in too far and you will have to thread the sensor in too far too as well (possible that it will never make a good seal) BTW nice wide wheels, I guess the top one is for the back!
    • Welp, good to know. Will have to wait awhile until steady hands with drills and taps are available. In other news, these just arrived! I will weigh them for posterity. Edit: 11kg each (or 10.9/11.1 depending on what my scale decides over multiple tests, the 18x11 don't seem to weigh noticeably any more than 10.5)  
×
×
  • Create New...