Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hehe, here's what it looks like in daylight on long exposure... I haven't waterproofed the light yet, so I gotta take it out n do that, any ideas on how to waterproof?

Also in the pic is the 2.5" Magnaflow exhaust that Tuffy's mufflers in Syd fitted at an extortionist price.

Enjoy...

lit_up_arse.jpg

the light up panel mounts over the rear bar, it came with my car but the light was blown... jus got around to finding a replacment... I still haven't waterproofed it and fitted it, so it'll still be a while b4 its int here permanently.

Well they charged me $900 for a cat back stainless steel system with a hi flow cat and magnaflow muffler. I already had the stainless steel extractors on mine. The old mild steel one had fubar'd. I was in a hurry coz I had to leave syd the next day so they managed to do it for me in 4 hours. But yeah, i got quoted afterwards for around $700-$800 for the same system.

Either way, i luv the new zorst, it made a pretty big difference.

I lived on Blaxland Rd about 500m away when I lived in Syd, so I was like "ah yeh, these guys kno me, they won't rip me off"... i dunno...

ewww blue... i dunno I don't want like the whole rainbow on the back of my car... the stove plates are red, so I think i'll keep with that whole "red is for stop" brakelight theme.

It uses a reddy/orange 12" cold cathode from Jaycar :D Getting it to work even when it rains is another story...

The thingy is just for r32's coz the behind of a 32 is different to a 33... 33's have a slim thing at the bottom made completely of transparent plastic.

Plus I have a GT wing that I bought like in April sometime, but never put onto the car, if I take the factory spoiler off I'll need to use somethign as a brakelight, and I might be able to use this as a high mount brake light. I dunno about that yet, coz I gotta ring up VicRoads n ask em.

Originally posted by TTZ32

Looks good, nearly as good as my arse:)

i would agree except it says 300ZX not skyline so that automatically makes it hella worse :lol:

  • 4 weeks later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Input shaft bearing. They all do it. There is always rollover noise in Nissan boxes - particularly the big box. Don't worry about it unless it gets really growly.
    • For once a good news  It needed to be adjusted by that one nut and it is ok  At least something was easy But thank you very much for help. But a small issue is now(gearbox) that when the car is stationary you can hear "clinking" from gearbox so some of the bearing is 100% not that happy... It goes away once you push clutch so it is 100% gearbox. Just if you know...what that bearing could be? It sounding like "spun bearing" but it is louder.
    • Yeah, that's fine**. But the numbers you came up with are just wrong. Try it for yourself. Put in any voltage from the possible range and see what result you get. You get nonsense. ** When I say "fine", I mean, it's still shit. The very simple linear formula (slope & intercept) is shit for a sensor with a non-linear response. This is the curve, from your data above. Look at the CURVE! It's only really linear between about 30 and 90 °C. And if you used only that range to define a curve, it would be great. But you would go more and more wrong as you went to higher temps. And that is why the slope & intercept found when you use 50 and 150 as the end points is so bad halfway between those points. The real curve is a long way below the linear curve which just zips straight between the end points, like this one. You could probably use the same slope and a lower intercept, to move that straight line down, and spread the error out. But you would 5-10°C off in a lot of places. You'd need to say what temperature range you really wanted to be most right - say, 100 to 130, and plop the line closest to teh real curve in that region, which would make it quite wrong down at the lower temperatures. Let me just say that HPTuners are not being realistic in only allowing for a simple linear curve. 
    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
×
×
  • Create New...