Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi there,

I trying to find some info on upgrading the sway bars in the R33 gts-t..

Has anyone actually upgraded their sway bars in a Skyline (and still has stock suspension)?

I don't really want to read what Whitline say, I want to here it from a skyline owner.. Do they really reduce body roll?

Are there any negatives about getting a sway bar upgraded (apart from more wear on tyres etc..).

Thanks for the advice.

Cheers

Rob

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/6655-handling-sway-bar-upgrade/
Share on other sites

Hey Rob!

i just got that front strut brace from UAS, and well hate to be a picky barstard, but did nothing Rob, i find it was the same, it was actually hitting the top of my engine (the middle section)

Anyways, yeh i didn't really see a difference @ all,

Im intrested in knowing if anyone has had the lower ones done, if they have lower ones...

Donnie

Originally posted by skyzerr33

sway bar is different to a strut brace.

a strut brace stiffens up the suspension so you can corner faster and stay stable on the road.

Actually, it stiffens up the chassis.
sway bar is below the engine

can't remember what it does

The sway bar, also called an anti-roll bar, is designed to resist the body roll of the car during cornering. It basically helps stop weight transferring from the inside wheel to the outside wheel.

I've driven R33's with and without and i have to say that the selby's sway bars from whiteline that are on my car ROCK MY WORLD!!! others on this forum have them as well and by all accounts, they love them too.

Go to www.whiteline.com.au and check it out.

:P

Thanks for the reply's.

So that said, I want to upgrade my sway bar but do I just get the rear done or the front or both?

Also anyone know a good thickness to get?

Hey Donnie,

Hmm, what can I say take, the strut brace back if it made no difference. I certainly felt an improvement...

Cheers

Rob

Changed both front and rear on mine. I got the adjustable ones. Turn in is heaps better. Body roll on fast corners is reduced, and if I want to hang the back out, just apply power and a little turn of the wheel. Best mod on any car. I've done this on my WRX and my Daewoo. Go through twisty roads and HP means shit. I've left a few highly modded cars in the dust with the Daewoo. For GTS-T, change the front bar if you only want to do one. But for best results change both.

And just for the record, Strut braces (on top of the engine bay) only increases chassis rigidity. It doesn't stop bodyroll. That's the swaybars job.

It depends what the car is doing now, handling-wise.

Rule of thumb is that a bigger / heavier swaybar on the front fill increase understeer, while a bigger / heavier swaybar on the rear will increase oversteer.

It would really be worth your while to talk to a suspension expert about it all.

I've put the HD R32 GT-R rear bar on my R32 GTS4. I haven't noticed a great deal of difference, but then I haven't really tested it. And I also have Bilsteins and Kings springs all round, so it would be really difficult to judge the effect of the bar.

And just for the record, Strut braces (on top of the engine bay) only increases chassis rigidity. It doesn't stop bodyroll. That's the swaybars job.

Yes it's the swaybars job but I have to disagree with you in that they absolutely do reduce bodyroll. The struts are restricted in their forward/back movement by the brace which in turn reduces bodyroll. Whether that's what they're for is moot. They simply do do this.

:P

Originally posted by 2rismo

 

Yes it's the swaybars job but I have to disagree with you in that they absolutely do reduce bodyroll.  The struts are restricted in their forward/back movement by the brace which in turn reduces bodyroll.  Whether that's what they're for is moot.  They simply do do this.

:P

What ARE you on, 2rismo?

Body roll has nothing to do with forward / backward movement of the struts. During body roll, the struts either extend or compress, depending on which way the car is turning / rolling. The degree of roll is controlled by the stiffness of the spring and the stiffness of the swaybar. The presence (or absence) of a strut brace has no bearing on this, other than to reduce the twisting in the chassis because the different ends of the car are sprung differently.

ahhh...

i wish i was an ascii artist or could draw what i mean in smilies.

Say you're going round a left hand corner...okay?

the natural way for the body to roll, as you correctly state, is to the side. HOWEVER, it is foolish to say that there is NO longitudunal movement of the struts, (i.e. front of car to back and vice-versa).

Remeber that i said, "whether that's what they are for or not is moot."

Strut Tower Braces whether it is their primary function or not, help with bodyroll. Physical fact.

:P

the old strut brace debate, let me add my 2c.

I had a good quality front strut brace fitted with stock springs and shocks that were in good condition and it did make quite a noticable difference to handling when the car was pushed - most noticably the body roll, much more than I would have thought (this was with stock suspension, not lowered at all).

Also I have since had the car lowered and upgraded shocks - I am not sure if the difference would have been as noticable if the car was lowered first as this changes the centre of gravity

I have had the selbies (whiteline) swaybars fitted and they are great. Cost about $220 each from memory?

Guest Nismo_Freak

Sways are just another way to customize how your car handles... you dont NEED sways but they are a good tool. I have a 240SX and I utilize a stock SE front sway bar and a Suspension Tech. rear bar. This allowed me to neutralize the natural tendency of the car to dive when braking before the corner and entering it at high speeds. Then when throttle is applied its very easy to drift the rear end out if needed and feel the break-away point on the tires. The rear end will step out sideways faster but when your not under throttle the rear end wont load the outter tire as much and you will avoid inertia oversteer. Heres my suspension mods as of now...

Tein HA Damper Coilovers with 8/6 Custom Spring Rates

Tein Pillowball Upper Mounts

Tein Pillowball Tension Rods

Tein Rear Toe Arms - Pillowball

Cusco Rear Camber Links - Pillowball

Kazama Subframe Spacers - Aluminum

Cusco Rear Strut Tower Bar

Ebay Special Front Strut Tower Bar - Hell yeah! 20 bucks!

Suspension Techniques Front and Rear Sway Bars - Front Not Installed

Falken Azenis 215/45/16s

Only competition I have locally is my friends GC8 (2.5RS Subaru Impreza) that has the same mods basically. Tein HR Dampers and the works.

Other Mods I Plan:

Do-Luck Mid Chassis Support Bar

R33 GTR Wheels w/ Big Tires

Kazama Front Tension Rod Support Bar

Pillowball Lower Arms

Then my car will be good enough for the street. The chassis already is stiff enough that it doesnt flex at all... my wheels come off the ground on en-even pavement.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
    • I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
    • You are all good then, I didn't realise the port was in a part you can (have!) remove. Just pull the broken part out, clean it and the threads should be fine. Yes, the whole point about remote mounting is it takes almost all of the vibration out via the flexible hose. You just need a convenient chassis point and a cable tie or 3.
×
×
  • Create New...