Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

click to open in a new window

th_b00_MYnewMX5photochopWEB.jpg

The above is the new MX5 as Mazda designed it.

Wheel's don't fit the guards, the car has no chin. It has a receding jaw and thus looks weak.

It also reminds me of those amphibious vehicles with the way the front is.

Below is a little photochop work. Looks more in proportion to me this way.

  • Replies 45
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

arg why would they change it. jeremy clarkson summed it up well in saying that it was a great little car because over the years the recipe never changed as it didn't need to.

the front is not nice to look at in my opinion

9449.jpg

i still think that any MX 5 is shit, and the people that own it think its a performance car. eg one guy trying to take me on in one LMAO. *** the mx 5, mazda should work on the next series of the RX-7 :P. that would be yummy

i still think that any MX 5 is shit, and the people that own it think its a performance car. eg one guy trying to take me on in one LMAO. *** the mx 5, mazda should work on the next series of the RX-7 :). that would be yummy

Hmmm, no, MX-5 IS a performance car. While the dude that tried to drag you would never have succeeded, on the track an MX-5 is brilliant - it's light, low, short and wide. I'd go as far as saying that it would be faster than a GTST on a reasonably twisty track.

Always lacked decent stonk even the turbo (what are they the SP models or something).. although nearly every motor journalist praised it for it's brilliant handling characteristics.

I'd love to see a rotary in it.. the engine being lightweight and with for more power available than it's current little NA and turbo mills.

But toatlly aggreed.. the new looks are like what the bug-eyed rex was to Subaru!!

a mate of mine has one which has an AVO turbo kit on it

it ran a high 12 with shitty tyres and dying clutch

there are also a coule guys who have 13B turbos in them as well

they are animals they have the balls that they always needed

the ones i know werent bullet roadsters

they were just pac performance jobs

they first proto type bullet was a 13B turbo but never went into production due to emmisions issues

they came with either a N/A V8 or a supercharged V8

they werent really MX5s either they were full custom chassis with rear half MX5 shell and custom front end

krzysiu... one of the boys at work owns an MX-5 which could make you eat your pants... think 900kg and 180rwkw :P courtesy of a 13b

I also added a chin. The car they've created has no jaw! What's up with that? Silly designers.

The bullet roadsters are insane. But their price is also insane... Bullet roadster or second hand boxter S, or even a second hand exige... I know which I'd buy.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • @GTSBoy yeah i know it was not the "great" idea but it is and option...but i think i will stay on no BoV rather then trying to make it work with "half" this and that. But that GReddy FV2 is cool...i like that you can make it like stock if you want (and have/make the custom pipes) For other thanks! it was alot of information. But for the sound...a dont rly "like" both of them...specialy if they are loud...but if i "must" choose i would rather have little whooosh rather than sutututu with no BoV....BUT that is what is i gonna get. So for the all info i gather. In my case:  No BoV is not that bad cuz it is stock...and iam used to put N/clutch right after rpms are around 1000 so it should be ok...just need to avoid "big" drops. But i do not have the engine in the car so i do not really know how "bad" or good it is. But as i had that little test drive it looked ok. The atmo BoV should be worse car would dump to much fuel specialy between the shifts...so without proper tune/ECU i dont want that. BUT with that...car should drive ok with no problems right? (i do like there is less piping wih this solution) 🙂 
    • Usually an RB20 won't stay in closed loop idle anyway. The O2 sensor gets too cold, stops swinging.
    • They aren't, but it depends on what interests you about an R32-R34. If it's the front engine I6 turbo that tunes well with a manual transmission an E92 335i 6MT is so incredibly cheap. You can get a super clean one for 20-25k USD tops. Put an LSD in it, tune it, have fun with it. If it's the general idea of AWD + turbo and a manual transmission the 996 Turbo is absolutely much more expensive, it's less practical but it's also basically a complete track-ready car from the factory. At least the Mezger doesn't have heaps of oil control issues. And in the US the 996 Turbo and R33 GTR are roughly the same price these days. 996 maybe a bit more now that the hype has abated for old Skylines here.
    • these are not the same
    • Best kept secret for seized bolts is crayons... Heat the sucker up with a torch, and push/melt crayon into it. Works a wonder. See if I can go 2 from 2 for you on how to get your bolts out...
×
×
  • Create New...