Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

click to open in a new window

th_b00_MYnewMX5photochopWEB.jpg

The above is the new MX5 as Mazda designed it.

Wheel's don't fit the guards, the car has no chin. It has a receding jaw and thus looks weak.

It also reminds me of those amphibious vehicles with the way the front is.

Below is a little photochop work. Looks more in proportion to me this way.

  • Replies 45
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

arg why would they change it. jeremy clarkson summed it up well in saying that it was a great little car because over the years the recipe never changed as it didn't need to.

the front is not nice to look at in my opinion

9449.jpg

i still think that any MX 5 is shit, and the people that own it think its a performance car. eg one guy trying to take me on in one LMAO. *** the mx 5, mazda should work on the next series of the RX-7 :P. that would be yummy

i still think that any MX 5 is shit, and the people that own it think its a performance car. eg one guy trying to take me on in one LMAO. *** the mx 5, mazda should work on the next series of the RX-7 :). that would be yummy

Hmmm, no, MX-5 IS a performance car. While the dude that tried to drag you would never have succeeded, on the track an MX-5 is brilliant - it's light, low, short and wide. I'd go as far as saying that it would be faster than a GTST on a reasonably twisty track.

Always lacked decent stonk even the turbo (what are they the SP models or something).. although nearly every motor journalist praised it for it's brilliant handling characteristics.

I'd love to see a rotary in it.. the engine being lightweight and with for more power available than it's current little NA and turbo mills.

But toatlly aggreed.. the new looks are like what the bug-eyed rex was to Subaru!!

a mate of mine has one which has an AVO turbo kit on it

it ran a high 12 with shitty tyres and dying clutch

there are also a coule guys who have 13B turbos in them as well

they are animals they have the balls that they always needed

the ones i know werent bullet roadsters

they were just pac performance jobs

they first proto type bullet was a 13B turbo but never went into production due to emmisions issues

they came with either a N/A V8 or a supercharged V8

they werent really MX5s either they were full custom chassis with rear half MX5 shell and custom front end

krzysiu... one of the boys at work owns an MX-5 which could make you eat your pants... think 900kg and 180rwkw :P courtesy of a 13b

I also added a chin. The car they've created has no jaw! What's up with that? Silly designers.

The bullet roadsters are insane. But their price is also insane... Bullet roadster or second hand boxter S, or even a second hand exige... I know which I'd buy.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Nah. You need 2x taps for anything that you cannot pass the tap all the way through. And even then, there's a point in response to the above which I will come back to. The 2x taps are 1x tapered for starting, and 1x plug tap for working to the bottom of blind holes. That block's port is effectively a blind hole from the perspective of the tap. The tapered tap/tapered thread response. You don't ever leave a female hole tapered. They are supposed to be parallel, hence the wide section of a tapered tap being parallel, the existince of plug taps, etc. The male is tapered so that it will eventually get too fat for the female thread, and yes, there is some risk if the tapped length of the female hole doesn't offer enough threads, that it will not lock up very nicely. But you can always buzz off the extra length on the male thread, and the tape is very good at adding bulk to the joint.
    • Nice....looking forward to that update
    • Neg, the top one is actually for the front. The sizes are 18x10.5 +18 and 18x11 +32.   I measured many times but I'm sure I'll have problems as this is the thread for problems.
    • Just one thing; tapping tapered threads is tricky. Taps are always tapered and you would generally run it as far as you can, but with a tapered thread you have to stop much sooner otherwise the wide part of the taper will run in too far and you will have to thread the sensor in too far too as well (possible that it will never make a good seal) BTW nice wide wheels, I guess the top one is for the back!
    • Welp, good to know. Will have to wait awhile until steady hands with drills and taps are available. In other news, these just arrived! I will weigh them for posterity. Edit: 11kg each (or 10.9/11.1 depending on what my scale decides over multiple tests, the 18x11 don't seem to weigh noticeably any more than 10.5)  
×
×
  • Create New...