Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

click to open in a new window

th_b00_MYnewMX5photochopWEB.jpg

The above is the new MX5 as Mazda designed it.

Wheel's don't fit the guards, the car has no chin. It has a receding jaw and thus looks weak.

It also reminds me of those amphibious vehicles with the way the front is.

Below is a little photochop work. Looks more in proportion to me this way.

  • Replies 45
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

arg why would they change it. jeremy clarkson summed it up well in saying that it was a great little car because over the years the recipe never changed as it didn't need to.

the front is not nice to look at in my opinion

9449.jpg

i still think that any MX 5 is shit, and the people that own it think its a performance car. eg one guy trying to take me on in one LMAO. *** the mx 5, mazda should work on the next series of the RX-7 :P. that would be yummy

i still think that any MX 5 is shit, and the people that own it think its a performance car. eg one guy trying to take me on in one LMAO. *** the mx 5, mazda should work on the next series of the RX-7 :). that would be yummy

Hmmm, no, MX-5 IS a performance car. While the dude that tried to drag you would never have succeeded, on the track an MX-5 is brilliant - it's light, low, short and wide. I'd go as far as saying that it would be faster than a GTST on a reasonably twisty track.

Always lacked decent stonk even the turbo (what are they the SP models or something).. although nearly every motor journalist praised it for it's brilliant handling characteristics.

I'd love to see a rotary in it.. the engine being lightweight and with for more power available than it's current little NA and turbo mills.

But toatlly aggreed.. the new looks are like what the bug-eyed rex was to Subaru!!

a mate of mine has one which has an AVO turbo kit on it

it ran a high 12 with shitty tyres and dying clutch

there are also a coule guys who have 13B turbos in them as well

they are animals they have the balls that they always needed

the ones i know werent bullet roadsters

they were just pac performance jobs

they first proto type bullet was a 13B turbo but never went into production due to emmisions issues

they came with either a N/A V8 or a supercharged V8

they werent really MX5s either they were full custom chassis with rear half MX5 shell and custom front end

krzysiu... one of the boys at work owns an MX-5 which could make you eat your pants... think 900kg and 180rwkw :P courtesy of a 13b

I also added a chin. The car they've created has no jaw! What's up with that? Silly designers.

The bullet roadsters are insane. But their price is also insane... Bullet roadster or second hand boxter S, or even a second hand exige... I know which I'd buy.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Yes the gear for the R33/34 is different, it is red and has a different number of teeth. My part didn't come with that gear though, so I don't know how many teeth are on the red one. You'd have to reuse the 260RS/R33 gear, as long as it's not destroyed.   Haha, as unfortunate as that might be it was working fine for about the first 1500km I've had the car for now.
    • Update all   thanks to the workshop manual, it lead me back to checking fuses as mentioned central locking and door open lights worked when acc was switched on. diagram attached shows two points of power 1. ACC and 2.  Batt with the later being fused (#28) I did check the fuses using a multimeter but I must have stuffed that up also. Went back and checked the batt fuse in interior fuse box and you wouldn’t believe it… a blown fuse. replaced fuse and everything is now working as it should including the climate control   thank you all with your positive insight and knowledge.    
    • Where is the warning "That this thread is super old"   I just went into a 5 year old thread, went to do a reply, and couldn't see anywhere obvious a warning of it being super old
    • Duncan is correct. Pitwork (and Toyota's own cheap brand "Drive Joy") were primarily created as brands to sell other manufacturers car parts. It would be weird if Nissan sold parts for Toyota vehicles with a Nissan logo on it, so they created Pitwork to sell parts for other brans Toyota, Honda etc. They are not the same as Nissan genuine parts, although they *do* meet Nissan's standards for replacement parts. They aren't supposed to be a substitute for genuine parts, but a cheaper alternative that is better than Ebay fake parts from you-know-where.
    • Thanks GTSBoy, much easier to work with it now it's free!  
×
×
  • Create New...