Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 128
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

So you can have the pleasure of "reclaiming" it.

Master yoda is pretty well known, it wont go unoticed for long.

Mmmmmm i think its time for a good ol fashioned mob beating :kick:

Hang in there guys our thoughts are with you ...... lets hope there's justice in this world.

From what troy said they specifically broke into the house to get the keys, nothing else was taken by the sounds of it....

Thats all they do these days apparently. Thats why i make sure my keys are always with me and when i sleep i put them under my bed right next to me. Key hooks are no good cos they just break in the door and grab the keys, and they're out of there in under a minute

Hope you find your skyline dude

damn man sorry ta hear same happened ta me some time back was lucky nuff to get cherry red back hope same for you all eyes in mandurah now open and scouting

TIME FOR THA VIGULANTEE SHITE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

there is word of it being recoverd?   is this true?

-pie

Not that i have been informed, so still sticking with its missing.

gtr34 thats what i'm hoping, just a joyride and dumped not much harm done.

it doesn't fit in the shed so can't lock her away from prying eyes. that fence needs to be a good 4 foot higher in my books now.

I went for a search around Mindarie/Clarkson at about 12 today, hoping to find it dumped somewhere but no luck. :(

I looked through some shopping centre carparks (Ocean Keys was one), because quite often cars are dumped where they are harder to spot. IMO what has happened is that someone has seen you driving home, planned what they are going to do & done it. Probably taken straight to someones backyard or a workshop for stripping, but for your sake I hope it turns up safe. To make matters worse the little prick that has done this will probably be reading all this.

Did they drive off, or roll it out of your house, because I though the sound off the car or opening of the gate (judging by what you posted) would have woken you up. I'm off again tommorrow, so will keep my eyes peeled again, today my head was swivelling at every burgunduy coloured car on the roads.

Best of luck dude.

i know your car as soon as i see it troy so i will be looking hard in the rockingham area for you mate. i am really sorry to hear this. i have ridden in MSTRYODA and it is a great car :(

good luck man i'm sure that it will turn up and these punks will get what they deserve...........

ossie

they came over the fence and out the kitchen door. didn't hear the car start, (though i would sleep through a bomb going off).

well as for them reading this, its quite possible theres 3 stickers with the url to SAU on the car.

been told the mags are destinctive so heres a pic

rims.jpg

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Yeah, that's fine**. But the numbers you came up with are just wrong. Try it for yourself. Put in any voltage from the possible range and see what result you get. You get nonsense. ** When I say "fine", I mean, it's still shit. The very simple linear formula (slope & intercept) is shit for a sensor with a non-linear response. This is the curve, from your data above. Look at the CURVE! It's only really linear between about 30 and 90 °C. And if you used only that range to define a curve, it would be great. But you would go more and more wrong as you went to higher temps. And that is why the slope & intercept found when you use 50 and 150 as the end points is so bad halfway between those points. The real curve is a long way below the linear curve which just zips straight between the end points, like this one. You could probably use the same slope and a lower intercept, to move that straight line down, and spread the error out. But you would 5-10°C off in a lot of places. You'd need to say what temperature range you really wanted to be most right - say, 100 to 130, and plop the line closest to teh real curve in that region, which would make it quite wrong down at the lower temperatures. Let me just say that HPTuners are not being realistic in only allowing for a simple linear curve. 
    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
    • Nah, that is hella wrong. If I do a simple linear between 150°C (0.407v) and 50°C (2.98v) I get the formula Temperature = -38.8651*voltage + 165.8181 It is perfectly correct at 50 and 150, but it is as much as 20° out in the region of 110°C, because the actual data is significantly non-linear there. It is no more than 4° out down at the lowest temperatures, but is is seriously shit almost everywhere. I cannot believe that the instruction is to do a 2 point linear fit. I would say the method I used previously would have to be better.
×
×
  • Create New...