Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 101
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

yeh u could do that... however im putting a rb26 in my r32 gtst for 8Gz,thats drive away! Quoted earlier 2day

I did consider that move.

I couldn't bring myself to part with 8k for a second hand motor with an unknown history. I would much prefer to pick up a 'to suit rebuild' rb25 or rb26 and have a fresh motor for much less.

8G's will easily get you a 'freshly rebuilt' RB30DET or RB25DET with a decent turbo and ecu & injectors, no doubt it will make more power than the 8G RB26 that doesn't include an ECU or turbo's big enough to make 300rwkw.

RB25 head - $1000

RB30 rebuild - $2000

Turbo - $2000

Exh. Manifold - $750

Ext. Gate - $750

Injectors - $300

ECU - $1100

Total - $7900

Obviously labour will be done your self with a mate or the old man.

Its not difficult to drop a motor in. :D

The point is for 8G's you get a lot in the way of an RB30.

Remember you may get the Rb26 up and running well with a PFC then it may all of a sudden pop or you may realise its breathing a lot. :)

It goes with the territority of buying second hand.

Joel- EGT gauge?? Is that Exhaust Gas Temp?? I dont run one, never realy heard alot about them, what can they do?

Apparently ign. timing is the biggest influence over exh. temps.

From what I understand,

setup the afr's correctly then keep pumping timing in to it until exh. temps level out and no longer drop.

Thats the 'optimum' ign timing for reliability and power. Providing it doesn't ping. I really do not know as I haven't fiddled.

retard = hotter exhaust temps, advance = cooler exh. temps.

higher compression also = cooler exh. temps.

Which is why retarded ignition timing + a leaner afr can help spool a turbo a little quicker.

This is all one of those 'Apparently' statements. :D

I have yet to have a fiddle to see for my self.

I would love to get my hands on a dyno where i can sit there and have a bit of a fiddle.

have any of you guys here in S.A had this coversion legalised? and if so what car was it done in and how easy was it?

Sky30 - you did this conversion in a 32 didn't you? also are you still using the RB20 box?

imho there is no chance of it being a legal conversion. Capacity of motor is too big for car...i think the biggest you can go was a 2.8 Litre motor (or something like that)?

Saying that (as discussed in the thread at the top of the forced induction thread) when you buy a new block from Nissan they come blank. This is so you can "transfer" your old engine number to your new block....get the hint?

I wouldnt put up with the rb20det gearbox for long. It will last, but id say the torque will kill em fast.

I wouldnt put up with the rb20det gearbox for long. It will last, but id say the torque will kill em fast.

I've so far clocked up 10,000km's. But I'm not making any power yet. :D

Even so it has started making strange noises in fourth as it accelerates so well out of corners in fourth at 1100rpm with boost spooling.. lol

The torque can easily shread the rb20 gearbox, i broke the original RB20 box, and 2 vl 5speeds(similar gearbox) over about a year, but they all were punished hard and pushed beyond the limit....

The VL n/a boxes are cheap and readily available, but I ended up finding a R33 turbo box at the right price, seems to be doing the job OK.

I think FATS on this forum has an RB26 in his R31, with a Ford XR6T turbo hanging off the side.

He is using the stock RB20det gearbox for now.

he is also using a stock GTR clutch.

now, from what I have heard, and video's I've seen, FATS doesn't baby his car... he has about 280rwkw I believe, and I'm sure that the midrange torque from that motor/turbo combo is fairly hefty.

So there is plenty of life in the RB20 gearbox.

sure an RB25 one would be a better option, but when I do this conversion, I will not be spending an extra $2K to replace a gearbox which is working fine.

I plan to do my engine conversion for $5K - so obviously it will be a simple, budget build.

*yells at calendar.. "hurry up 2006"*

imho there is no chance of it being a legal conversion. Capacity of motor is too big for car...i think the biggest you can go was a 2.8 Litre motor (or something like that)?

R32's came with the RB25DE so all capacity increases can be taken from a 2.5 litre base not 2.0 litres. As far as I am aware that would make the 3.0 litre (20%) an OK capacity increase in the states that I know of.

:)

R32's came with the RB25DE so all capacity increases can be taken from a 2.5 litre base not 2.0 litres. As far as I am aware that would make the 3.0 litre (20%) an OK capacity increase in the states that I know of.

:)

Ahhh, but here in SA a emissions test cost like 3k +, and the only place u can get it done is Mitsubishi. Even then Transport SA are not guaranteed to accept it.

They can even say no to a fully qualified engineers report done in all states, with full emissions testing.

If Transport SA have any doubt in their mind as to whether or not it will be ok, they will refuse the rego (defect), which in 99% of cases will happen.

Hell, its even part of legislation in SA that no SAPOL or transport SA employee can be held accountable if they are wrong......go figure???:headspin:

Ahhh, but here in SA a emissions test cost like 3k +, and the only place u can get it done is Mitsubishi. Even then Transport SA are not guaranteed to accept it.

 

They can even say no to a fully qualified engineers report done in all states, with full emissions testing.

 

If Transport SA have any doubt in their mind as to whether or not it will be ok, they will refuse the rego (defect), which in 99% of cases will happen.

 

Hell, its even part of legislation in SA that no SAPOL or transport SA employee can be held accountable if they are wrong......go figure???:headspin:

I keep telling the SA guys to get their cars registered in Vic, Nelson is a nice town, just over the border, post office boxes are cheap and mail redirection inexpensive.:)

PS, NO GOVERNMENT can legislate your rights away under Common Law, you ALWAYS retain those rights.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Have a look at that (shitty) pic I posted. You can see AN -4 braided line coming to a -4 to 1/8 BSPT adapter, into a 1/8 BSPT T piece. The Haltech pressure sender is screwed into the long arm of the sender and factory sender (pre your pic) into the T side. You can also see the cable tie holding the whole contraption in place. Is it better than mounting the sender direct to your engine fitting......yes because it removes that vibration as the engine revs out 50 times every lap and that factory sender is pretty big. Is it necessary for you......well I've got no idea, I just don't like something important failing twice so over-engineer it to the moon!
    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
    • I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
×
×
  • Create New...