Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I dont disagree on anything for a change ;) maybe soimethings wrong with me hehe

Dr D. The Top secret rom has to go....

When i ran 20 degrees i got 30hp more midrange wow! @12psi

Back to 15deg and i can run more boost but only 8hp more top end but lose driveability mid range!

Adam My turbo specs do match my graph thats ok im happy with that...im not particularly interested in a vertical dyno chart like um.. :) ps 4500rpm

Rob i guess u have to like a dyno and stick with it so u can monitor inprovements..It is all in all only a tool for development :) But however what im saying is that i got a minimal increase by doing certain things and went back to the same dyno!

Thanks steve i didnt think so either but wanted some feedback just incase i thought i was greedy..

cheers

mac

  • Replies 104
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Originally posted by macka

Dr D. The Top secret rom has to go....

Maybe sell it for cash+swap for standard ecu? The top secret rom would be a good upgrade for someone who couldn't afford a s-afc but wanted to get rid of the standard ecu timing problems.

BTW, you're not greedy for wanting more power. It happens, even to the best of us :)

awesome.. my mates R33 has one also.. never seen another around like it, diff cooler, the lot. :-)

apparently another mate read somewhere that they only made 100 or so of these from the factory.. nice little score! :(

Shaun

Originally posted by GTS-t VSPEC

I guess I should expect this, I've already answered others on the forum. Probably should change my user name.

My R33 GTS-t has a VSPEC diff, yes it does have the fins on the diff like the VSPEC's. That means that I have the benefit of both traction control and Active LSD. It came from the factory with this so I presume there aren't too many of them around.  

The Active LSD is really cool for high speed cornering, causing the back-end to quickly turn in so you can keep the power down.

See'ya

:burnout:

Originally posted by Gradenko

Maybe sell it for cash+swap for standard ecu? The top secret rom would be a good upgrade for someone who couldn't afford a s-afc but wanted to get rid of the standard ecu timing problems.

BTW, you're not greedy for wanting more power. It happens, even to the best of us :(

Your right the Rom is a good upgrade for some people as i did lose power installing the standard one back in for a check, its just a matter of getting another standard unit now...

Macka are you running the stock turbo? If so I would have thought the thing woulda run outta puff at higher boost levels.

What does the dyno map do above 3500 RPM? Does it skyrocket or mystriously level off at some rev point?

What are the injectors doing (i.e duty cycle?) Fuel pressure? Is the pump suppling enough fuel? Fuel air mixtures may be deceiving. If for example the engine isn't keeping enough fuel in the combustion chamber the exhaust output appears rich.

Just some thoughts ......

Thanks for your interest Puckish

Look to the left at my avatar , that snail lives in my car!!

I have a large front mount and 550hp fuel pump

Injectors have a bit of headroom but i havent checked airflow % yet as i forgot...duh!

Gonna try at the drags tonight i have a special pair of slicks now curtesy of GTS-t VSPEC :lol:

It was an impressive run Macka, well done. I'm glad those racing slicks I gave you did the job, maybe I can line something better up for you next time. 12.98 will take some catching by the rest of us, but I'm prepared to bide my time until the bigger turbo is on.

Well done again, and nice to actually meet you.

See'ya:burnout:

PS: I'm not too impressd witht the 265's I put on, I still get shitloads of wheel-spin, maybe able to get some Potenza's for the drags, that should provide more grip.

Thanks...

how bout them bald Tyres. ey..

That was a freaky time ey...shocked me but she ran beautiful on 1Bar

Maybe the track was prepped better i managed a 2.254 60ft this time..

I thought id teach a V8 torry a lesson but he creamed me with a 12.5 hehe oh well

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • For once a good news  It needed to be adjusted by that one nut and it is ok  At least something was easy But thank you very much for help. But a small issue is now(gearbox) that when the car is stationary you can hear "clinking" from gearbox so some of the bearing is 100% not that happy... It goes away once you push clutch so it is 100% gearbox. Just if you know...what that bearing could be? It sounding like "spun bearing" but it is louder.
    • Yeah, that's fine**. But the numbers you came up with are just wrong. Try it for yourself. Put in any voltage from the possible range and see what result you get. You get nonsense. ** When I say "fine", I mean, it's still shit. The very simple linear formula (slope & intercept) is shit for a sensor with a non-linear response. This is the curve, from your data above. Look at the CURVE! It's only really linear between about 30 and 90 °C. And if you used only that range to define a curve, it would be great. But you would go more and more wrong as you went to higher temps. And that is why the slope & intercept found when you use 50 and 150 as the end points is so bad halfway between those points. The real curve is a long way below the linear curve which just zips straight between the end points, like this one. You could probably use the same slope and a lower intercept, to move that straight line down, and spread the error out. But you would 5-10°C off in a lot of places. You'd need to say what temperature range you really wanted to be most right - say, 100 to 130, and plop the line closest to teh real curve in that region, which would make it quite wrong down at the lower temperatures. Let me just say that HPTuners are not being realistic in only allowing for a simple linear curve. 
    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
×
×
  • Create New...