Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Guys;

I've had my gearbox rebuilt (was catching on 1-2 too often) with new synchros and bearings and I'm running Motul oil. Problem is that it still sometimes catches 1-2 and 2-3, doesn't matter whether it's cold, hot, hi rpm or low rpm. Only way to guarantee it won't catch is to pause briefly during the shift but that means losing pace. 3-4, 4-3, 3-2 are no problem.

Tried different oil and Slick 50 but no change. I know that heavy duty (compared to most other cars) gearboxes like the GTR tend to be a bit clunky due to the sheer size etc of the internals and I don't expect it to be ever be as smooth as a Camry or WRX ie 'hot knife through butter, but I'm not happy about this happening in mine so soon after a rebuld. It doesn't get thrashed and I expected that the shift might be heavy but still smooth with no catching - ever. Rebuild was done by Award in Sydney.

Is this just the way they are or should a rebuilt box be like silk? Thanks for any feedback.

Regards

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/68896-gearbox-shift-quality-r32-gtr/
Share on other sites

A couple of things come to mind.

Firstly, make sure the clutch is not dragging.

Secondly, the viscosity of the oil in your box will make a big difference to the shift quality & to the synchro's. First stop is to make sure you have the right grade.

The second step is to use the ubiquitous Redline oil. This often helps old/tired boxes, but I'm not sure about new ones.

Beyond that it may require the gearbox out again.

Just out of interest in regards to viscosity.. too viscous means you tend to drag stuff right? and if it's too thin what happens then?

I've been running redline shockproof heavy in my box and now it's seized in 3rd so I'm wondering if that may have done it?

Just out of interest in regards to viscosity.. too viscous means you tend to drag stuff right? and if it's too thin what happens then?

I've been running redline shockproof heavy in my box and now it's seized in 3rd so I'm wondering if that may have done it?

Too thin means Crunch!

Guys;

I've had my gearbox rebuilt (was catching on 1-2 too often) with new synchros and bearings and I'm running Motul oil. Problem is that it still sometimes catches 1-2 and 2-3, doesn't matter whether it's cold, hot, hi rpm or low rpm. Only way to guarantee it won't catch is to pause briefly during the shift but that means losing pace. 3-4, 4-3, 3-2 are no problem.  

Tried different oil and Slick 50 but no change. I know that heavy duty (compared to most other cars) gearboxes like the GTR tend to be a bit clunky due to the sheer size etc of the internals and I don't expect it to be ever be as smooth as a Camry or WRX ie 'hot knife through butter, but I'm not happy about this happening in mine so soon after a rebuld. It doesn't get thrashed and I expected  that the shift might be heavy but still smooth with no catching - ever. Rebuild was done by Award in Sydney.

Is this just the way they are or should a rebuilt box be like silk? Thanks for any feedback.

Regards

Mmmmmm, gearboxes do take time to run in and you haven't mentioned how many K's it done since the gearbox was rebuilt. Personally i don't find GTR gearboxes to be overly heavy or slow to shift. We use exclusively Castrol synthetic lubricants (Syntrax 75W90 in the gearbox) so I have no experience with other oils.

If it were me, I would have a talk to Award and see what they have to say:cheers:

Thanks SK;

It's probably done about 6000km since the rebuild. I'll talk to them, have already spoken to the shop that took it out and they were full of words like 'size of internal parts, mass, old technology' etc but they didn't give me a definitive answer.

In particular I don't see why it would do it sometimes and not others.

Regards

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Even with the piston at TDC there was room for it to drop, but I don't think it can drop fully into the cylinder, the problem you have is that you need something pushing against the valve to hold it up so you have enough room to put the new stem seal on and the spring etc.  I used compressed air only because putting rope in the cylinder seemed a bit risky to me, I know people have done it countless times before like this. Overall it's a pain in the ass job. Honestly you'd probably be better off taking the head off because the risk of dropping something in the engine and the finicky-ness of it all is very stressful. If you are going to attempt it though i 10000% recommend a 36050 valve spring/keeper tool. I had both the traditional lever type and after doing 1 cylinder it was absolute pain to get those valve keepers in place, even with 2 people. That 36050 is amazing, you do have to push hard to get them in place but it works perfectly almost every time. Back to my actual issue I think my engine is just tired and old and the rings have gone bad. The comp numbers (cold, no oil) were: Cyl 1 -129psi Cyl 2 - 133psi Cyl 3 - 138psi Cyl 4 - 137psi Cyl 5 - 157psi Cyl 6 - 142psi   Cylinder 5 and 6 having the most carbon on them.
    • Who did you have do the installation? I actually know someone who is VERY familiar with the AVS gear. The main point of contact though would be your installer.   Where are you based in NZ?
    • Look, realistically, those are some fairly chunky connectors and wires so it is a reasonably fair bet that that loom was involved in the redirection of the fuel pump and/or ECU/ignition power for the immobiliser. It's also fair to be that the new immobiliser is essentially the same thing as the old one, and so it probably needs the same stuff done to make it do what it has to do. Given that you are talking about a car that no-one else here is familiar with (I mean your exact car) and an alarm that I've never heard of before and so probably not many others are familiar with, and that some wire monkey has been messing with it out of our sight, it seems reasonable that the wire monkey should be fixing this.
    • Wheel alignment immediately. Not "when I get around to it". And further to what Duncan said - you cannot just put camber arms on and shorten them. You will introduce bump steer far in excess of what the car had with stock arms. You need adjustable tension arms and they need to be shortened also. The simplest approach is to shorten them the same % as the stock ones. This will not be correct or optimal, but it will be better than any other guess. The correct way to set the lengths of both arms is to use a properly built/set up bump steer gauge and trial and error the adjustments until you hit the camber you need and want and have minimum bump steer in the range of motion that the wheel is expected to travel. And what Duncan said about toe is also very true. And you cannot change the camber arm without also affecting toe. So when you have adjustable arms on the back of a Skyline, the car either needs to go to a talented wheel aligner (not your local tyre shop dropout), or you need to be able to do this stuff yourself at home. Guess which approach I have taken? I have built my own gear for camber, toe and bump steer measurement and I do all this on the flattest bit of concrete I have, with some shims under the tyres on one side to level the car.
    • Thought I would get some advice from others on this situation.    Relevant info: R33 GTS25t Link G4x ECU Walbro 255LPH w/ OEM FP Relay (No relay mod) Scenario: I accidentally messed up my old AVS S5 (rev.1) at the start of the year and the cars been immobilised. Also the siren BBU has completely failed; so I decided to upgrade it.  I got a newer AVS S5 (rev.2?) installed on Friday. The guy removed the old one and its immobilisers. Tried to start it; the car cranks but doesnt start.  The new one was installed and all the alarm functions seem to be working as they should; still wouldn't start Went to bed; got up on Friday morning and decided to have a look into the no start problem. Found the car completely dead.  Charged the battery; plugged it back in and found the brake lights were stuck on.  Unplugging the brake pedal switch the lights turn off. Plug it back in and theyre stuck on again. I tested the switch (continuity test and resistance); all looks good (0-1kohm).  On talking to AVS; found its because of the rubber stopper on the brake pedal; sure enough the middle of it is missing so have ordered a new one. One of those wear items; which was confusing what was going on However when I try unplugging the STOP Light fuses (under the dash and under the hood) the brake light still stays on. Should those fuses not cut the brake light circuit?  I then checked the ECU; FP Speed Error.  Testing the pump again; I can hear the relay clicking every time I switch it to ON. I unplugged the pump and put the multimeter across the plug. No continuity; im seeing 0.6V (ECU signal?) and when it switches the relay I think its like 20mA or 200mA). Not seeing 12.4V / 7-9A. As far as I know; the Fuel Pump was wired through one of the immobiliser relays on the old alarm.  He pulled some thick gauged harness out with the old alarm wiring; which looks to me like it was to bridge connections into the immobilisers? Before it got immobilised it was running just fine.  Im at a loss to why the FP is getting no voltage; I thought maybe the FP was faulty (even though I havent even done 50km on the new pump) but no voltage at the harness plug.  Questions: Could it be he didnt reconnect the fuel pump when testing it after the old alarm removal (before installing the new alarm)?  Is this a case of bridging to the brake lights instead of the fuel pump circuit? It's a bit beyond me as I dont do a lot with electrical; so have tried my best to diagnose what I think seems to make sense.  Seeking advice if theres for sure an issue with the alarm install to get him back here; or if I do infact, need an auto electrician to diagnose it. 
×
×
  • Create New...