Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi ppls,

I got the RB30DET tuned up today running the stock RB20DET turbo on the stock actuator pressure.

Boost peaked at 12psi and made 100rwkw by 2000rpm, boost then quickly dropped to 11psi, held for a little while, then tapers off quickly, by 4800rpm boost was down to 9psi where it made 176rwkw.

Not too bad for 9psi. :D

The tune was only a 1hr tune. AFR's were adjusted to 12:1.

By 6000rpm the injectors were hitting 100% duty with 12:0 afr's.

Quite a bit of timing had to be pulled over 4800rpm, Shaun the tuner said it was due to the backpressure of the stock turbo.

The exhausts dump pipe is a little bodgy which wouldn't have helped the back pressure issue.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/70088-rb30det-tune-on-stock-rb20-turbo/
Share on other sites

  • Replies 61
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Seat of the pants, it feels stronger everywhere and feels much much more rev happy.

Even though the dyno graph shows it dropping off after 4800rpm it still easily pulls and feels like it is still accelerating hard until 6000rpm.

Shaun told me to change just before 6000rpm.

Definitely quicker than the rb20det running 16psi. :P

Its the exhaust housing and compressor causing a lower peak rpm power.

THe compressor is obviously maxing out its airflow and diving in to choke, which is why it is dropping boost.

The exhaust housing is causing a massive restriction which causes reversion, hence reduced VE. :(

High back pressure in the exhaust manifold lowers VE/Cylinder filling.

Shaun had to pull a heap of ignition timing after 4800rpm as it was pinging really easy.

He said it was due to the small hotside. :P

Cams with more overlap i think will make it worse.

Hurry and get yours tuned darren. I am really keen to see the difference your larger turbine wheel makes to where peak power is made. :(

Unsure what the dip is in torque through the mid range.

Probably a sideaffect from a 1hr tune. :P

I think with a little more time spent on the tune and a RB25 turbo it will make 200rwkw without any problems.

Would also be interestering if boost drops off like it has with the rb20det turbo.

i thought u had a gt35r joel? as soon as i have my engine stand i'll be able to get started on mine *hint, hint* joel, nah just kidding!

anyway great results on the dyno and its good to see that i'll still be able to have good results using the little turbo while i save up for a bigger and better hairdryer while running her in!

No GT35R just yet..

I have the custom .82 exhaust housing that bolts up to the stock manifold and has provision for the connection of an external wastegate.

I've got a few things to get yet. Wastegate, CHRA, Comp Cover, Injectors.

I'm still holding off a little on the Comp cover as I am deciding what I really want.

Should I step down the Comp cover to a .5 and go the larger exhaust housing (similiar to the ford xr6t & improve top end VE) or should I go the smaller exhaust a/r with the larger comp cover.

I think the ford setup will suit my needs a little better. All I am after is close to 300rwkw. :rofl:

280rwkw I would be happy.

I don't know. :)

Cubes - Did you build this RB30 yourself and just get Shaun to tune it?

I really want to plunge into this whole RB30 thing as I love a bit of torque but unfortunately while I "know" a bit about mechanics I have really only ever messed with the basics in the real world and so I don't know how much I trust myself... And I don't have all the tools at this stage!

Seems to be a couple of SA guys on the RB30 bandwagon (mr_rbman I'm looking at you!). Maybe you could all teach me! Heh :)

I had Chris Milton Engineering rebuild/port/polish the head, Andrew from City Dismantlers (who has now left) rebuild the rb30 bottom end and bolt the head on.

I pulled out the rb20det and dropped in the rb30det in my old mans shed.

I origionally was going to assemble the motor my self but to be honest the cost assembly was stuff all, the expense comes with machining, pistons etc..

so who;s going to be the first to get their RB30DET tuned with a GT35R.... i want some results :D

Excellent result!

I won't be the first that's for sure, still deciding on what box to use ;)

An excellent result, gives the others going down the same path more motivation to get it done :rofl:

I popped out to grab some fried rice for tea. lol Thats my excuse anyhow. :rofl:

For those interestered.

Boot down up to 4850rpm saw 90% duty cycle, 4.1v on the Z32 AFM and 13 knock.

She broke traction all the way through second twisting the car around when I came off the throttle to grab the next gear. biggrin.gif

It definitely has some torque. ;)

Alf.. That flamin' Alf Fisher avtar is shocking.. lol

It hits .1v higher, now 4.1v.

Prior to the tune the most I saw was 4v.

Previously I wasn't reving it out, changing up around 3500rpm.

The stock AFM was hitting 4.98v. So basically the Z32 drops voltage by 1v at those airflow levels.

Standard cruise and idle airflow voltages appear to be the same if not very very similiar.

One thing I have noticed is with the Z32 it tends to idle and cruise slightly richer. With the stock AFM it was dead on 14.7:1 both cruise and idle.

Now it tends to sit on 14.2:1 on idle and 13.9-14:1 on cruise, I'm unsure if this small amount will affect fuel economy.

It could be my O2 sensor has decided to kick the bucket as I've fitted the Z32 afm. :rofl:

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Even with the piston at TDC there was room for it to drop, but I don't think it can drop fully into the cylinder, the problem you have is that you need something pushing against the valve to hold it up so you have enough room to put the new stem seal on and the spring etc.  I used compressed air only because putting rope in the cylinder seemed a bit risky to me, I know people have done it countless times before like this. Overall it's a pain in the ass job. Honestly you'd probably be better off taking the head off because the risk of dropping something in the engine and the finicky-ness of it all is very stressful. If you are going to attempt it though i 10000% recommend a 36050 valve spring/keeper tool. I had both the traditional lever type and after doing 1 cylinder it was absolute pain to get those valve keepers in place, even with 2 people. That 36050 is amazing, you do have to push hard to get them in place but it works perfectly almost every time. Back to my actual issue I think my engine is just tired and old and the rings have gone bad. The comp numbers (cold, no oil) were: Cyl 1 -129psi Cyl 2 - 133psi Cyl 3 - 138psi Cyl 4 - 137psi Cyl 5 - 157psi Cyl 6 - 142psi   Cylinder 5 and 6 having the most carbon on them.
    • Who did you have do the installation? I actually know someone who is VERY familiar with the AVS gear. The main point of contact though would be your installer.   Where are you based in NZ?
    • Look, realistically, those are some fairly chunky connectors and wires so it is a reasonably fair bet that that loom was involved in the redirection of the fuel pump and/or ECU/ignition power for the immobiliser. It's also fair to be that the new immobiliser is essentially the same thing as the old one, and so it probably needs the same stuff done to make it do what it has to do. Given that you are talking about a car that no-one else here is familiar with (I mean your exact car) and an alarm that I've never heard of before and so probably not many others are familiar with, and that some wire monkey has been messing with it out of our sight, it seems reasonable that the wire monkey should be fixing this.
    • Wheel alignment immediately. Not "when I get around to it". And further to what Duncan said - you cannot just put camber arms on and shorten them. You will introduce bump steer far in excess of what the car had with stock arms. You need adjustable tension arms and they need to be shortened also. The simplest approach is to shorten them the same % as the stock ones. This will not be correct or optimal, but it will be better than any other guess. The correct way to set the lengths of both arms is to use a properly built/set up bump steer gauge and trial and error the adjustments until you hit the camber you need and want and have minimum bump steer in the range of motion that the wheel is expected to travel. And what Duncan said about toe is also very true. And you cannot change the camber arm without also affecting toe. So when you have adjustable arms on the back of a Skyline, the car either needs to go to a talented wheel aligner (not your local tyre shop dropout), or you need to be able to do this stuff yourself at home. Guess which approach I have taken? I have built my own gear for camber, toe and bump steer measurement and I do all this on the flattest bit of concrete I have, with some shims under the tyres on one side to level the car.
    • Thought I would get some advice from others on this situation.    Relevant info: R33 GTS25t Link G4x ECU Walbro 255LPH w/ OEM FP Relay (No relay mod) Scenario: I accidentally messed up my old AVS S5 (rev.1) at the start of the year and the cars been immobilised. Also the siren BBU has completely failed; so I decided to upgrade it.  I got a newer AVS S5 (rev.2?) installed on Friday. The guy removed the old one and its immobilisers. Tried to start it; the car cranks but doesnt start.  The new one was installed and all the alarm functions seem to be working as they should; still wouldn't start Went to bed; got up on Friday morning and decided to have a look into the no start problem. Found the car completely dead.  Charged the battery; plugged it back in and found the brake lights were stuck on.  Unplugging the brake pedal switch the lights turn off. Plug it back in and theyre stuck on again. I tested the switch (continuity test and resistance); all looks good (0-1kohm).  On talking to AVS; found its because of the rubber stopper on the brake pedal; sure enough the middle of it is missing so have ordered a new one. One of those wear items; which was confusing what was going on However when I try unplugging the STOP Light fuses (under the dash and under the hood) the brake light still stays on. Should those fuses not cut the brake light circuit?  I then checked the ECU; FP Speed Error.  Testing the pump again; I can hear the relay clicking every time I switch it to ON. I unplugged the pump and put the multimeter across the plug. No continuity; im seeing 0.6V (ECU signal?) and when it switches the relay I think its like 20mA or 200mA). Not seeing 12.4V / 7-9A. As far as I know; the Fuel Pump was wired through one of the immobiliser relays on the old alarm.  He pulled some thick gauged harness out with the old alarm wiring; which looks to me like it was to bridge connections into the immobilisers? Before it got immobilised it was running just fine.  Im at a loss to why the FP is getting no voltage; I thought maybe the FP was faulty (even though I havent even done 50km on the new pump) but no voltage at the harness plug.  Questions: Could it be he didnt reconnect the fuel pump when testing it after the old alarm removal (before installing the new alarm)?  Is this a case of bridging to the brake lights instead of the fuel pump circuit? It's a bit beyond me as I dont do a lot with electrical; so have tried my best to diagnose what I think seems to make sense.  Seeking advice if theres for sure an issue with the alarm install to get him back here; or if I do infact, need an auto electrician to diagnose it. 
×
×
  • Create New...