Jump to content
SAU Community

RB25/30 and quench?

StockyMcStock
 Share

Recommended Posts

StockyMcStock Proficient

StockyMcStock

Posted
Posted

okay so i today i bolted my crank and new pistons back in, and measured the deck clearance. by this i mean piston edge to block face clearance. it was zero, in other words the piston edges at TDC were exactly level with the top of the block.

i looked at my RB25 head, and noticed that the combustion chambers don't appear to have large squish areas. the only apparent squish areas i could see are the lateral (side to side, not front to back) edges of the combustion chamber, where it is exactly level with the head face. the closest recess after these (to the piston) is the lateral border of the combustion chamber but it is 2.5 mm or so from deck height, which is way too far for a conventional squish setup of 40 thou.

so my questions are:

1) do i set the quench (squish) up using just these areas as a reference guide? in other words, do i set up the clearance from piston edge deck height to the head face as 40 thou?

2) what thickness is a fully torqued down genuine nissan head gasket? (obviously need to know this so i can figure out the quench!)

cheers,

-Stocky

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/72033-rb2530-and-quench/
Share on other sites
Cubes Grand Master

Cubes

Posted
Posted

Stock new pistons? Have you taken measurements for the comp ratio?

The quench area is the flat part of the combustion chamber that is level with the rest of the head plane.

I actually thought it was quite large for a 4valve head, there isn't really any room for more quench.

The RB20DET head has almost zero quench area.

StockyMcStock Proficient

StockyMcStock

Posted
  • Author
Posted

stock pistons with standard bore size will give me anywhere betwen 8.2 and 8.9 compression ratio, which i am happy with.

i thought as much with the squish area, but i thought it would have been larger. maybe i'm just optimistic and have looked at too many motorbike engines :cheers:

no worries, i can calculate the quench off the head clearance without any problems.

any ideas on RB30 head gasket thickness?

mjfawke Collaborator

mjfawke

Posted
Posted

It's the area round the edge of the head where the pistons come close at TDC. The relatively cooler surfaces 'quench' the mixture to prevent detonation. The high HP GTR engines (according to an American engine builder living in Japan) remove both 'quench' blocks from the head, and for mid-power engines the one on the inlet side is removed and the exhaust side is radiused. He claims they are only for turbulence generation, not for quench. There are some decent head pics on Hybridz.org under the RB Engines forum.

Cubes Grand Master

Cubes

Posted
Posted

Thats what quench does.

Swirls or creates turbulence that cools hot spots, mixes the charge better and also squeezes it towards the central spark plug.

Quench is designed more so for low/mid range as it isn't as critical in the higher rpm's.

But as we all know average power is where its at.

If it wasn't why would we bother with the rb30det over the rb25det or even the rb20det. :)

ace_nz Apprentice

ace_nz

Posted
Posted

squish or quench is very important at all engine speeds, look at formula 1 heads and pistons, or any high reving bike engine, its mechanical octane. Removing the squish band from rb heads just increases the surface area of what is already a large deep chamber, id be adding in squish and biasing it to the exhaust side to increase the burn speed and reduce trapped end gases which cause detanation. (rb30 head gasket is 55 thou. will crush to 50)

  • 1 month later...
Abo Bob Grand Master

Abo Bob

Posted
Posted

This seems like a good thread to ask my question.

I have a stock NEO RB25 and want to run more boost. Tuner says put a thicker head gasket in to lower the compression ratio. I say, pull some timing from the tune and I don't need to.

Sydneykid says, "Personally I don't believe in thick head gaskets, they cause other problems."

I think he is referring to the change in quench/squish (Are these terms completely interchangable?).

Does that sound right?

What exactly will be the effect on quench if I put a thicker head gasket in? How is this bad?

Sorry for so many questions. As soon as you learn enough about turbos along comes quench and who knows what next! I've only just started looking at spark plugs...

Sydneykid Grand Master

Sydneykid

Posted
Posted
sweet, 50 thou, no worries mate! now i can deck the block and head by a combined 10 thou and get my flat 40 thou of quench.  

cheers!

The standard head gasket should give you the correct amount of squish, as designed by Nissan. ie; you should not have to deck the block or the cylinder head.

This seems like a good thread to ask my question.

I have a stock NEO RB25 and want to run more boost. Tuner says put a thicker head gasket in to lower the compression ratio. I say, pull some timing from the tune and I don't need to.

Sydneykid says, "Personally I don't believe in thick head gaskets, they cause other problems."

I think he is referring to the change in quench/squish (Are these terms completely interchangable?).

Does that sound right?

What exactly will be the effect on quench if I put a thicker head gasket in? How is this bad?

Sorry for so many questions. As soon as you learn enough about turbos along comes quench and who knows what next! I've only just started looking at spark plugs...

I have seen more than one engine develop more detonation after a thicker head gasket was installed. Squish is one reason for this, the other is the thick (metallic) head gasket itself creates hot spots. Potentially all around the combustion chamber circumference. Not a good idea.

I would much rather spend the same amount of money (as a thich head gasket costs) removing restrictions, rather than increase the boost to make more power. If you MUST reduce the compression ratio, then polishing the combustion chamber gives a better result for the same cost.

;)

StockyMcStock Proficient

StockyMcStock

Posted
  • Author
Posted

well i measured the head gasket from nissan with a micrometer and got 47 thou, assuming 5-10 thou crush the squish was just perfect with a deck height of zero. so i told the machinist to face the block, but take as little off as humanly possible. i think he took of 2 thou which is just about right for me ;)

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Duncan
      Mistakes were made, my R34 Story

      By Duncan · Posted

      Have a look at that (shitty) pic I posted. You can see AN -4 braided line coming to a -4 to 1/8 BSPT adapter, into a 1/8 BSPT T piece. The Haltech pressure sender is screwed into the long arm of the sender and factory sender (pre your pic) into the T side. You can also see the cable tie holding the whole contraption in place. Is it better than mounting the sender direct to your engine fitting......yes because it removes that vibration as the engine revs out 50 times every lap and that factory sender is pretty big. Is it necessary for you......well I've got no idea, I just don't like something important failing twice so over-engineer it to the moon!
    • GTSBoy
      Mistakes were made, my R34 Story

      By GTSBoy · Posted

      Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
    • Kinkstaah
      Mistakes were made, my R34 Story

      By Kinkstaah · Posted

      How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • funkymonkey
      Jacks that fit under GTR lips that can reach the subframe?

      By funkymonkey · Posted

      I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
    • GTSBoy
      Mistakes were made, my R34 Story

      By GTSBoy · Posted

      I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
×
×
  • Create New...