Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

im having problems shifting to first gear when the car is in motion. eg: im going around 15km/h around a bend and i wanna gear down from second to first i have to use a bit off force to get it into first though if my car is idle or going under 5km/h theres no problem at all.

Any 1 got any ideas on what the problem is?

why would you want to put it in first anyways?

everytime im about to pull up to my driveway i have to slow down to the max to put it into first, y cant i put it into first while im a few metres from my driveway?

We sure do get some funny opinions on here. Like the [apparently] commonly held view that there is something technically wrong with changing back to 1st gear. No more than changing back to any lower gear! If you syncronise the speed of rotation of the gear driven by the engine, with that of the gear driven by the wheels - Viola!! or Presto!!! or whatever, then they will mesh easily and silently, and no damage done, and why not?

The syncromesh normally does this for you, but it becomes harder for the mechanism to syncronise speeds, the lower the gear, and the further apart are the revs of the 2 gears. Don't think my one finger could take writing a full description of how and why on this, however........

You actually can do this syncronising yourself by "double-declutching" sometimes known as 'doubling the clutch',which among other things will make your Syncros last virtually forever. It's a slower method of changing, but I habitually do it all the time, except when some nut 'has a go' and annoys me.

If anybody really wants a run-down of how to do it,I will,reluctantly write it up. Trouble is, it sounds much more complex than it is, albeit after a bit of practice.

With that in mind,when I went out to-day, I thought I'd see just what was possible [R32 GTSt] -- The first surprise I got was at the 1st Round a bout, when I found that I normally change back into 1st at between 15 and20k, because the exit of this round a bout, goes into one lane and there is mostly some Galah, who has gone around the outside, and is going to beat you to the one lane.. NOT!!!

I found that I do the change back to 1st so naturally, that I was not even aware of it.

So,,,,,,, I did some experiments and found it perfectly easy up to 30k. Got more difficult over 35k, in that you needed to be more precise with revs. As around 40k is about [i find] about the fastest USEFUL speed when going UP in 1st gear, there was'nt much point in trying anything else, but it would be possible, but useless, up to your rev limit.

Yeah, I looked and found it. My advice to anyone who does'nt already know all about it, to stay away from it. About 50% of it is wrong and the other 50% of it is not right!!! No, it's not quite that bad, but at least 50% of the opinion is wrong and the rest is only slightly more difficult to understand than the theory of relativity. They've all ignored the function of 'baulk rings', which is why Tracid Trax originally thought there was something the matter with his gearbox, because it was just plain not possible to force it in. Therefore,that's why those who say that double de-clutching is'nt necessary, or is a waste of time, are WRONG.

It allows you to go into a gear you want to go into, by the use of knowledge and skill, when the wonderful 'Do everything for you - you don't need to know, Syncromesh gearbox' fails. Before anybody trys to explain the double de-clutching method, or what syncromesh does would be well advised to first find out how a basic gearbox works.

As an apprentice our work truck was an international with no syncros so I had to learn pretty damm fast how to double clutch. they way I learnt was to listen to to revs (no taco)at certain speeds so if I had to change to that gear at that speed i'd rev to that sound and it would slip in with no crunch, up was allways easier than down.

hahah no synchros is a great way to learn. The other way is to drive the car without using the clutch for a while, you will soon know if you are getting it right or not :D

But Jax, don't you agree there is no real benefit to double declutching if your sychros are OK? We have had a lot of synchro trouble with our race cars but when they are OK good old heal toeing is all that is required

No, sorry, I don't agree. Unless the clutch is engaged when you rev the engine, then you don't bring the engine driven gears up to match the gears driven by the wheels. If you don't get those speeds right [with no,or worn syncros] or close, with good syncros, then the baulk rings will stop the gears meshing.

I know nothing about Eastern Creek, left Sydney before it existed, but very familiar with Oran Pk, Amaroo and most other Aust circuits, and agree that, as there are no, to my knowledge,1st gear corners anywhere [unless you lost it] then what you say is OK for circuit racing, BUT, I was addressing the original question of this thread. He needs to get it in 1st., and in an efficient way, and as I do on that round a bout the only way is by doubling the clutch. [There may have been a hillclimb or two around which may have had a 1st gear corner -- maybe there still is?]

By the way, some gearboxes won't come out of gear without using clutch - most will so long as throttle is floating or backed off. I had several GTR Toranas and none of them, M21 g/boxes, could be got out of gear without the clutch [not without so much force that you went straight thru neutral into another gear. Lost clutch several times - bloody nightmare]

By the way,again - like to see someone enter that round a bout with me and come out in front, without using 1st gear and without doubling clutch - Horses for courses.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Hi all,   long time listener, first time caller   i was wondering if anyone can help me identify a transistor on the climate control unit board that decided to fry itself   I've circled it in the attached photo   any help would be appreciated
    • I mean, I got two VASS engineers to refuse to cert my own coilovers stating those very laws. Appendix B makes it pretty clear what it considers 'Variable Suspension' to be. In my lived experience they can't certify something that isn't actually in the list as something that requires certification. In the VASS engineering checklist they have to complete (LS3/NCOP11) and sign on there is nothing there. All the references inside NCOP11 state that if it's variable by the driver that height needs to maintain 100mm while the car is in motion. It states the car is lowered lowering blocks and other types of things are acceptable. Dialling out a shock is about as 'user adjustable' as changing any other suspension component lol. I wanted to have it signed off to dissuade HWP and RWC testers to state the suspension is legal to avoid having this discussion with them. The real problem is that Police and RWC/Pink/Blue slip people will say it needs engineering, and the engineers will state it doesn't need engineering. It is hugely irritating when aforementioned people get all "i know the rules mate feck off" when they don't, and the actual engineers are pleasant as all hell and do know the rules. Cars failing RWC for things that aren't listed in the RWC requirements is another thing here entirely!
    • I don't. I mean, mine's not a GTR, but it is a 32 with a lot of GTR stuff on it. But regardless, I typically buy from local suppliers. Getting stuff from Japan is seldom worth the pain. Buying from RHDJapan usually ends up in the final total of your basket being about double what you thought it would be, after all the bullshit fees and such are added on.
    • The hydrocarbon component of E10 can be shittier, and is in fact, shittier, than that used in normal 91RON fuel. That's because the octane boost provided by the ethanol allows them to use stuff that doesn't make the grade without the help. The 1c/L saving typically available on E10 is going to be massively overridden by the increased consumption caused by the ethanol and the crappier HC (ie the HCs will be less dense, meaning that there will definitely be less energy per unit volume than for more dense HCs). That is one of the reasons why P98 will return better fuel consumption than 91 does, even with the ignition timing completely fixed. There is more energy per unit volume because the HCs used in 98 are higher density than in the lawnmower fuel.
    • No, I'd suggest that that is the checklist for pneumatic/hydraulic adjustable systems. I would say, based on my years of reading and complying with Australian Standards and similar regulations, that the narrow interpretation of Clause 3.2 b would be the preferred/expected/intended one, by the author, and those using the standard. Wishful thinking need not apply.
×
×
  • Create New...