Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hey Guys just thought i would let you know how i went when i recently got my car dynoed. Mods to the car so far goes: -

R33 gtst series 1.5 1995

Pod

FMIC

Exhaust

Splitfire coils

HD clutch

Note- Stock boost

Stock ECU

Stock turbo

Next mod im about to put an apexi pfc in.

So i was wondering would i need to change the AFM as i heard they are only sposed to be rated a 300 hp there abouts.

Also i will be putting a new fuel pump bosch 040 will that make a difference in hp (sorry if thats a noob question).

Just wanted to get that out of the way instead of doing a mod then retuning then another mod and retune etc. Cheers :D

Edit Sorry about the size of the pic im having trouble with the scale.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/76919-another-dyno-result-with-questions/
Share on other sites

I have to believe the figure because it was done by a ShootOut accredited workshop.

However it sounds very high for standard boost pressure (7psi) and just exhaust and cooler considering it came with 187fwkw.

Was it dyno'd in 4th gear?

Either way great result, congrats.

With regards to the upgraded fuel pump.

You should be able to install it and have no impact on your current ecu and power.

As the fuel pressure regulator will just bleed/bypass any extra fuel the new pump delivers to the fuel rail, keeping standard rail pressure.

Does sound pretty high for stock boost, stock ECU and stock turbo to be honest.

To give a comparison, my car was dynoed at 195rwkw with the following mods:

R33 SII

Power FC

Profec B (set to 12psi)

Blitz FMIC

3" turbo back exhaust (w/ hiflow cat)

K&N Panel Filter

HD Clutch

...and yes, it was also in shootout mode on a dyno dynamics dynometer.

I think the figure for my car is pretty comparable to quite a few others on here with similar mods.

Perhaps you've got one of those so-called 'freak' ECU's??? Either way, I'd be cheering if I got 189rwkw with your mods. Well done :D

Yeah i thought it was a bit high for the mods done. When he came out and told me what i got i didnt believe him i was like what horsepower or fly wheel kw's. But my guess is it is over boosting to possibly 9-10 psi. That could be intermitant(sp) yeah cos most times i can see it sit dead on 7 but twice i have i seen go higher than that.

Interested to hear what you guys think.

In regards to the dyno it was done in 4th gear.

Im interested to see what it can make with the apexi (arrived today but i wasnt home :rofl: so i have to pick it up tomorrow).

What about the afm is it still ok to keep that?

before i had the safc2 installed in my r33 i had basicaly the same mods as you.. mine did about 170kw @8psi or so (b4 the safc).. This wasnt in shootout mode though and shootout mode gives you a slightly higher result than non-shootout mode i believe.

so id say your result is about right, now hurry up and get the FC put in :rofl:

I have made 195rwkw. Bleeder @ 13psi, chipped ECU, full 3" zorst.

selectmaz.jpg

Just remember that dynos are tuning tools and will never be able to tell you how fast the car is...

Ah from the Selectmaz dynoday. How long it take you to get your sheet? :rofl:

That power seems very high for standard boost. Just chuck it on a different dyno and you will see the difference. From 2 dyno reading i have had 20rwkw difference, even though 1 was in tuning mode and the other shootout.

Nice result non the less. If it pulls hard its all good :P

I've seen plenty of cars pull 180-200rwkw.

But usually with a little more boost than standard and a fuel cut defender or SAFC.

Maybe your ecu is chipped from Japan or has a fuel cut defender spliced in somewhere?

They can make the power easy, you just have to get past the rich and retard thing that the standard ecu does.

...it seems weird to me as well..

Regardless of the power you are making, your A/F ratios are...um...pretty damn good for a stock ECU (if that is your AFR's..)

I know the 1.5's had some good learning ECU's - but its still a bit hard to swallow..

If the figure is true, i would say just by looking at that dyno that you have some sort of engine management - PowerFC, SAFC...

The graph is too perfect..

Rigga's dyno is more believable, with a chipped ECU...powerFC would iron out those dips !!

Hey Chris..

Depends on what the "chipped" ECU controls...

Seems like from your dyno that the speed limiter was removed, and that possibly the fuel and ignition timing was also modded..

It really depends on the tuner, and also tuning points available. From your sheet, too hard to do a comparison to say a power FC or SAFC..

Yeah to the best of my knowledge it is stock ecu boost etc. But when i went to get my clutch changed it had some sort of lightened flywheel unsure of type but would like to know (forgot to add that). But i doubt it would make that much difference So its possible it may have had a chip etc.

About the car pulling hard it does from a little bit then hits a flat spot (not pushing you back in your seat) this is about 2500-3500 but goes alright from then on. Maybe im expecting to much. Picked up my apexi today :). Had a talk to a tuner and he said i should invest in an avcr or some sort of boost control than runs off the power fc. Got like a bleed valve (not connected in dyno run) but he said they were crap for holding boost accurately etc. I dont know much about boost controllers show what should i get :confused:

So what sort of boost controllers you guys running and what do think of them?

About the ecu learning it was unplugged for a little while then plugged back in to do the power run. Not sure if that has anything to do with it but.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • My first car was a HG. I'm very familiar with them. A mild cam upgrade is a good idea. The 186 is a very flexible engine - meaning it has good torque from down low. You can give up a little torque down low for quite a lot more excitement in the mid range, and a bit more up top - but they are not exactly a rev monster. You need to upgrade valve springs at the minimum. For a bigger cam, you'd want to make sure it wasn't still running the original fibre cam gear. That would be unlikely, given that most of them shat themselves in the 70s and 80s, but still within the realms of possibility. Metal cam gear required. Carbies are a huge issue. The classic upgrade was always a Holley 350, which works, but is usually pretty bad for fuel consumption. The 186S had a 2 barrel Stromberg on it that was very similar to the one on the 253, and is a reasonable thing if you can find one, and find someone to help you get it set up (which is the same issue with setting up a 350 to work nice). The more classic upgrade was twin sidedraught CD type carbs, or triples of same, or triple Webers. The XU-1 triple Webers being the best example. You can still buy all this stuff new, I think, but it's a lot of coin to drop. And then the people able to set them up are getting fewer and further in between. There's still some, but it used to be everyone's** dad and uncle could do it. **Not everyone's! But a lot. All in all, I wouldn't get too carried away with the engine. Anything you do to it without a full rebuild for power and revs will only make it slightly faster. I am all in favour of a complete teardown rebuild, with nice rods and pistons, 10 or 10.5:1 compression, and a clean port job with at least a big enough cam to run 98 with that compression, if not bigger. And if I did that to a dirty old red motor, I'd want to inject it too, which I'd struggle to fight against the devil on my shoulder that would argue for ITBs and trumpets. But the bills would start to mount up, and it will still never make stupid power. OK, a few people still know how to build absolutely mental red motors, courtesy of the work that went into HQ racing and modern knowledge being applied. But even a 300HP red motor is no match for an RB20 with a TD06. So you have to decide what it's worth to you. I'd just put a set of 6>2>1 extractors, a 2.5" exhaust and an electronic ignition conversion/dizzy on it and just run the old girl like the fairly slow old girl that she really is.
    • Thank you so much for the comments.  This is very interesting and gives me some great ideas to think about. Keen to keep it simple and relatively classic looking. That said, i am not too worried about staying 100% period correct.  A little extra performance and relatively good (or improved) economy is just what i am looking for. Ill be keeping any parts i swap out so if i get nostalgic i can always swap it all back in.  Right now just trying to get some good ideas from people in the know (I still have a lot to learn in this space). Thank you again!  
    • Wrt the engine, you're very much limited by 'production quality' as to how much extra power you can extract from them (I'm talking i6 red-motor) -- a lot here depends on how 'authentic' or 'period correct' you want the modifications to be... ...I'm too old... <grin>...the first true performance engine Holden made, was in the HD/HR models ~ this was the 'X2' performance pack...it came with twin downdraft strombergs on an otherwise unimproved intake manifold, with a two piece exhaust manifold (reckoned to be as good as extractors)... ....these engines were built upon the '179HP' cylinder block, which included extra webbing in the casting to make it stronger and less susceptible to block distortion... The next performance i6 came out with the HK Monaro (also found it's way into the LJ GTR Torana ... the car I wish I hadn't sold)...it had pretty much the same manifold setup, but was built against the '186S' block...this block retained all the extra webbing of the 179HP block, but added a forged steel crankshaft (instead of the stock cast crankshaft), because it was possible to snap the crank... ...apart from the inherent weaknesses in the stock (cast crank) blocks, the next limiting factor is the cylinder head porting & combustion chamber design, and the actual valve sizes. Back in the day, you could buy a 'yella terra' cylinder head (from stage 1 to stage 5 gradients), and this was the way to get serious power out of them -- with the extra breathing of these heads, you could fit a triple SU or DCOE Weber setup... ...obviously, these mods were a waste of time on a stock cylinder head/camshaft grind. My housemate rebuilt the i6 in his VH dunnydore about 6 months back -- this is a 186S block with the 12port 2850 blue motor head and intake/exhaust manifolds, with a dual throat Weber off an XF Falcon mounted on an adapter plate ; it's not a bad makeup...got more torque & fuel economy just light-footing it about on the first throat, but stand on it and it makes more giddy-up than the standard 2850 blue motor that it replaced. Personal note: I'd just fit an RB30 and be done it it 馃槂  
    • Thanks for sharing. That's a great video! My buddy is doing the same thing on his build (S chassis struts and towers). He's building an S14 with billet RB30 shooting for 2000whp... a race car with a TH400 just like this video. For a road car I just couldn't go this route as the strut has to be almost vertical and the caster is not going to pivot correctly (let alone camber gain). You think the R32 frontend is bad, wait till you put a MacPherson strut on without modeling it all in Solidworks to check geometry. I'm not saying it's a bad way to do it but I'd be really curious to see how it affects the geometry.
    • Hey Christof and welcome!  Sounds like an awesome project! I'm not sure many of the regular users on here would know much about the HK but I could be wrong.  Looking forward to updates.
  • Create New...