Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

After studying :confused: (yeah right) RB engines for a little while, i noticed a couple of years back, twin turbo RB25's were kinda popular, especially in VL's. So I was wondering if any of you intelligent humans know if the standard GTR manifold can fit the RB25, or is custom the only way to go? Any help would be greatly appreciated, cheers

The inlet and exhaust manifold stud patterns wers made deliberately different by Nissan to stop people from putting R26 manifolds on RB25's. They believed it would increase the exclusivity of the GTR and support its higher price.:rofl:

Gee that only leaves 100000 other parts that will fit :(

By far, most of the parts that give the RB26 the extra performance are not interchangeable. Things like cams, valves, valve springs, followers, injectors, inlet manifold exhaust manilfold, inlet plenum, throttle bodies, turbos, dumps, engine pipes, inlet air temp sensor, ECU etc

Sure I can use the same spark plugs, oil filter, CAS, water temp sensor etc but they are hardly what I would class as "performance" increasers.

:rofl:

I fitted the twin turbos off the R34 GTR to my GTS25t track car. The manifolds fit after cutting and welding 2 of the flanges, then match porting. Everything then just bolts up like the exhaust. It's not easy or cheap.

I fitted the twin turbos off the R34 GTR to my GTS25t track car. The manifolds fit after cutting and welding 2 of the flanges, then match porting. Everything then just bolts up like the exhaust. It's not easy or cheap.

Hi Gtr Geoff,

Just interested in how well the GTS25t went and what sort of power it made?

Did you use standard gtr turbos?

Cheers!

A lot of people look into this idea . SK costed out the cams buckets springs etc to mod a R33 25 head , buying the GTR head and manifolds is far cheaper .

I'm not disputing that Nissan made it difficult to fit GTR manifolds to any other RB head , but when comparing them too many things get in the way to make it practical . Obviously the RB20 pattern came first and the GTR type later . It looks impossible to fit the GTR inlet on the alternate pattern because there would be no access to the fasteners . The exhaust stud pattern has the same dramas for the same reason . The two flanges would have been changed to give access to the nuts and washers around the twin turbos .

Bang for buck using the complete RB26 top end (turbo/s optional) is best from a performance viewpoint if you can afford it . Being non VVT it solves the oil drain problems as well and another reason why I bought mine .

Cheers A .

It was feeling nice.

Unfortunately the stock (see ceramic turbines) front turbo decided to let go at 5psi and I now have 25psi compression on 1,2,3. This is appearing more common than I initially thought possible, but when the ceramic turbine let go on this setup (RB26 style) it is often ingested back into the 3 cylinders and scores the bores and stops the valves closing.

I would never do this again with the stock GTR turbos as they tend to be more prone to failure after being removed. That said, it would be too expensive to bugger with using expensive turbos. I think I will be dropping in a complete RB26 for a number of reasons, although they aren't as punchy low in the rev range.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Lets say I wanted to buy this, specifically for this purpose. How do I actually perform the function. Can I still buy a Consult-1? Am I about to be burned by the fact my car is a 2000 model Series 2 R34 and thus will be some stupid other system? Do I just need this -> https://obd2australia.com.au/product/nissan-consult-14-pin-to-usb-ddl-diagnostic-interface-with-ftdi-ft232r-chip/ And with what software?
    • That's probably OK. That's a face to face compression joint between two surfaces with the clamping load provided by those bolts. So.... it's unlikely that the bolts will end up feeling that load in shear, unless the clamping surfaces are not large enough, bolts not got enough tension on them, etc etc to prevent the two faces from moving wrt each other. Which... I would hope the designers have considered, seeing as it's probably one of the most important things the upright has to do apart from resist collapsing in its own right. But yes, it would definitely be worth asking them what their safety factor on that part of the design was. I tend to think that the casting, being a casting, is not necessarily the strongest bit of material in the world. It's about an inch square, and when you think about the loads that are being put into it, you have to wonder what safety factor the Nissan boys (and every other OEM engineer who has designed all the millions of other uprights that look essentially the same) used to account for defective casting, aging, severe impacts on the wheel, etc etc. 
    • Those bolts would be orders of magnitude stronger that cast aluminium though.  And its mainly clamping force, not shear they are dealing with?
    • Except all that twisting force that is breaking a cast piece, appears to be going through 4 bolts in the picture Johnny posted of the BryPar one...
    • The smart approach is to use the gearbox loom from the manual car. Makes it a lot easier - just plugs into the switches on the box and plugs into the main loom up near the fusebox. Then you only need to deal with bypassing the inhibit switch. The other approach requires you to use the wiring diagram to identify those wires by colour and location, perhaps even indulging in a little multimeter action to trace them end to end to make sure, and then.... you will have the answers you need. The R34 wiring diagram is available on-line (no, I do not have a link to it myself - I would have to do a search if I wasn't able to go to the copy I have at home).
×
×
  • Create New...