Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Reading through another thread I am confirming my limited knowledge of the 4 stroke engine.

Please someone post a pic of where the squish area is on a head. I think it would help some of us less educated people understand more easily.

Does compression ratio change squish?

Headgasket thickness?

If you modify the combustion chamber?

Anything else thatll effect it?

Importance bt turbo and NA engines?

Cheers

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/78651-squish-you-squish-me/
Share on other sites

In the photo that's hopefully below, the area with the red squigles on it is the quench/squish are. Basically it is the area where the flat surface of the head face sits over the flat areas on the piston. "quench" is because these areas run cooler than the rest of the chamber as very little combustion actually happens in these areas. "squish" is because these areas squish the air/fuel mixture in towards the spark plug.

In order with your questions,

1. There is no direct relation between quench area and compression, although moving the piston closer to the head will increase compression. The closer the piston runs to the head, the more compression you can run without detonation or at the same compression you can run more timing.

2. Head gasket thickness does affect quench, the closer the piston sits to the head without hitting it, the more complete combustion you will have as a shock wave is formed between the flat areas, pushing the air/fuel mixture in towards the spark plug. A thicker head gasket will move the faces further apart and result in less efficient combustion.

3. If you modify the combustion chamber on the flat areas it will affect it, Jun machines most of the quench pads away and their engines make great power, I'm not sure of the exact reason why they do it though. It still leaves a ring around the outside of the chamber that sits over the piston though.

4. Machining the top of the block will move the pistons closer to the head, machining the head will not make any difference to piston to head clearance, it will increse compression and decrease piston to valve clearance though.

5. I'd say it's equally important in both turbo and n/a engines.

There are a lot of different thoughts on quench area. Endyne in the US do a lot of hondas and say that the actual compression doesnt matter in a turbo engine as long as the piston top has the right profile. They also shape their pistons to push the air/fuel mixture towards the spark plug and the exhaust side of the chamber. It's an interesting idea and they have the numbers on the board to show it works. If you're interested, have a look at www.theoldone.com theres quite a few days reading there.

here's a copy of a post i made on another forum regarding squish/quench on an RB25/30, it's dumbed down a fair bit but only to make it easier to understand. fluid mechanics can be a bitch to get your head around if i use the proper terminology:

when the piston gets to top dead centre, and the head surface is 40thou away from the piston edge, the air/fuel mixture which is there encounters a bit of a problem. it's trying to be compressed (locally) very forcefully by huge local pressures and hence wants to get the f*ck out of there. it therefore gets pushed at huge velocity the only way it can go: inwards. this creates a lot of turbulence in the combustion chamber which mixes the fuel/air mixture even more and also causes it to swirl at huge velocity. it has the added effect of forcing the mixture up to the middle of the combustion chamber (at such huge piston velocities the local pressure changes actually stay as changes rather than homogenising for a fraction of a second which is all it needs) where the spark plug is.

so when it sparks, you get a very well mixed, turbulent mixture igniting. it reduces local "hotspots" and improves the efficiency (completeness) of the burn.

the squish band is illustrated here: the flat edges of the piston which come very very close to hitting the squish areas on the head, shown in the 2nd picture. the universal standard for squish is about 40 thou on a high-revving engine to allow for rod/crank/piston stretch at high RPM. you can go as low as 30thou safely though.

so if you think about it, if the flat areas on the edge of the piston are exactly level with the top of the block (as in an RB30) at top dead centre, and the head shown here (RB25) has flat squish areas exactly level with the head face, then the only thing stopping the piston hitting the head on the edges is the head gasket thickness. luckily for us, it's 47 thou which crushes to about 38-45 thou at full torque.

goat.jpg

explanatory2.jpg

Great post Craig, not easy to explain in plain English. My 20 cents worth on this bit;

3. If you modify the combustion chamber on the flat areas it will affect it, Jun machines most of the quench pads away and their engines make great power, I'm not sure of the exact reason why they do it though. It still leaves a ring around the outside of the chamber that sits over the piston though.

I think Jun are caught between a rock and hard place, They need to lower the compression ratio to run the huge boost, but they know they will have detonation issues if they stick a thick head gasket in there. Using a bowled piston would have the same effect. They can't machine out the combustion chamber as there is not enough metal to the water jacket. So they remove the squish ramps. Certainly not ideal, but the best of a bad bunch of choices.

:)

In real world terms what would this acheive, eg: better efficiency & how better, more overall response, more HP, smoother revving, etc

If some people have followed the Japanese trend and have installed 1.6mm head gaskets which have cost a small fortune - is it worth removing and obtaining squish because they would of obviously lost this.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Plazmaman 76mm Pro Series, done. Data to back it up, I posted up somewhere here a few years back
    • So.....wire it up appropriately. You can't use the resister pack with those injectors anyway.
    • that’s the thing i’m on ID1050s and haltech not getting power due to the injector resistor 
    • ahh okay cheers, i was thinking of just going for the m073, think m079 would be way too overkill considering they are same size. 
    • My first car was a HG. I'm very familiar with them. A mild cam upgrade is a good idea. The 186 is a very flexible engine - meaning it has good torque from down low. You can give up a little torque down low for quite a lot more excitement in the mid range, and a bit more up top - but they are not exactly a rev monster. You need to upgrade valve springs at the minimum. For a bigger cam, you'd want to make sure it wasn't still running the original fibre cam gear. That would be unlikely, given that most of them shat themselves in the 70s and 80s, but still within the realms of possibility. Metal cam gear required. Carbies are a huge issue. The classic upgrade was always a Holley 350, which works, but is usually pretty bad for fuel consumption. The 186S had a 2 barrel Stromberg on it that was very similar to the one on the 253, and is a reasonable thing if you can find one, and find someone to help you get it set up (which is the same issue with setting up a 350 to work nice). The more classic upgrade was twin sidedraught CD type carbs, or triples of same, or triple Webers. The XU-1 triple Webers being the best example. You can still buy all this stuff new, I think, but it's a lot of coin to drop. And then the people able to set them up are getting fewer and further in between. There's still some, but it used to be everyone's** dad and uncle could do it. **Not everyone's! But a lot. All in all, I wouldn't get too carried away with the engine. Anything you do to it without a full rebuild for power and revs will only make it slightly faster. I am all in favour of a complete teardown rebuild, with nice rods and pistons, 10 or 10.5:1 compression, and a clean port job with at least a big enough cam to run 98 with that compression, if not bigger. And if I did that to a dirty old red motor, I'd want to inject it too, which I'd struggle to fight against the devil on my shoulder that would argue for ITBs and trumpets. But the bills would start to mount up, and it will still never make stupid power. OK, a few people still know how to build absolutely mental red motors, courtesy of the work that went into HQ racing and modern knowledge being applied. But even a 300HP red motor is no match for an RB20 with a TD06. So you have to decide what it's worth to you. I'd just put a set of 6>2>1 extractors, a 2.5" exhaust and an electronic ignition conversion/dizzy on it and just run the old girl like the fairly slow old girl that she really is.
×
×
  • Create New...