Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hey Guys,

I've spoken to my boss who wants to do a deal for Skyline Owners...

I work for 2 for 1 Window Tinting on the Gold Coast located at Ashmore and Burleigh.

How Does $160 per Skyline Sound?

How Does $20 extra if we have to remove existing window tints?

Only $20 extra for the 4 door skylines

Please PM for information on tints available. :)

All tints must be done on a Saturday, however we might be able to (depending on interest) tint some cars during the week. All cars must be tinted in groups of 5- or more on the day. We will offer this deal over several Saturdays with dates to be finalised depending on interest.

All Skylines owners must PM me for this deal to be honoured.

P.S - Our Design Team are specialists in creating custom graphics to individualize your car.

You can visit our web site at: http://www.2for1windowtinting.com.au/

Thanks Guys, we look forward to meeting the skyline community :P

P.S - I will reply to all messages via PM.

EZYTGR

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/78876-160-for-skyline-window-tints/
Share on other sites

Hey,

We apply the film to the glass, and trim the edge as required.

The gap of natural light above the tint on the glass edge is almost non-existent. If you would like to see our quality, please stop by at any stage to see for yourself.

I know what you mean by variances - Other companies have been known to grind the excess tint off, both damaging the glass and causing imperfections in its sealing ability. I have also heard of other companies pre-cut the templates with 5mm of natural light showing at every edge, Cutting the time frame down but it's looks very dodgy.

P.S - Frameless glass is no problem.

Thanks

  • 5 years later...

quick / noob question

i got that crappy purple colour tint on the rear window which is peeling. looks horrible. Does it make a difference removing the tint with the de-mister / heater wires (not sure what you'd call it) that are on the rear window?

very keen on tints

Quick heads up to teh noobs...

last post was in 2005... i don't think he can fit you in unless your delorian skyline can travel back in time

and louie.. check the dates before you search for ancient shit eh...

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I know why it happened and I’m embarrassed to say but I was testing the polarity of one of the led bulb to see which side was positive with a 12v battery and that’s when it decided to fry hoping I didn’t damage anything else
    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
×
×
  • Create New...