Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 316
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

so what other bolt on turbos are out there that make substantially more power than the 260rwkw that the hpiab one acheives ? I thought for the price of the the turbo thats a pretty good result .

What I would think a better option is the GT3071 with the internal T25 .86 exhaust. They are an early spooling powerful unit and reportedly good for 300rwkw. I have a few in the field here but no dyno results yet, as they are a new option here.

The negative is you will need an adapter for the base flange if using on a std manifold.

As the Horsepowerinabox turbo uses the .7 comp cover this combined with the VG30DET exhaust a/r would most probably make more power than the GCG item that runs the stock .4 (I think it is) RB25 comp cover.

Inabox, Would you be willing to offer such an item IF the vg30det exhaust housing was supplied?

Cubes the real GT3071R's CHRA number is 700177-23 with the 84 trim 60mm GT30 turbine. Its on that site under medium frame comparisons .

An interesting thing to look at is the turbine efficiency of the more performance based turbo options . The GT2860RS (used to be called GT28RS) is 72% as is the GT3076R (GT30R in old speak or 700382-12 CHRA) . The GT3582R (old speak GT35R or GT3540R) is 70% . It starts to slip away with the 56 trim version of the GT2871R at 66% turbine efficiency and goes through the floor with those "other" GT3071R's that use the cropped (56.6mm vs the normal 60mm) GT30 turbine in the overbored GT28 exhaust housing . There's an even worse example in the GT2876R (old speak GT2540R Garret version) which uses the 76mm 48 trim T04S dinosaur compressor , around 60% turbine efficiency . The side note even says not recommended for performance engines as its not symmetrically sized ?

When you can find them the Garrett engineers will tell you that high turbine efficiency is critical to make it work well . You may think the difference between 60 and 72% efficiency is trivial but in the real world its huge .

When you consider the turbine and compressor pair major diametres a pattern begins to show .

GT2860RS 53.8 x 60.1 10.4%

GT3071R 60.0 x 71.1 15.6%

GT3071R 56.6 x 71.1 20.4%

GT3076R 60.0 x 76.2 21.3%

GT3582R 68.0 x 82.0 17.1%

GT28T04S 53.8 x 76.0 29.2%

Generally the closer in size the pair are the greater the turbine efficiency .

Cheers A .

As the Horsepowerinabox turbo uses the .7 comp cover this combined with the VG30DET exhaust a/r would most probably make more power than the GCG item that runs the stock .4 (I think it is) RB25 comp cover.

Inabox, Would you be willing to offer such an item IF the vg30det exhaust housing was supplied?

Th GCG ball bearing high flow has a highly modified (machined) compressor cover.;)

The GT3582R (old speak GT35R or GT3540R) is 70% .

Got any more info on these turbos disco? Im looking for something for my 3L....how do these compare to the old GT35r's? Whats changed from the previous turbo...

Also noticed they have a GT32 series now??

All I want is a nice efficient .8# turbine a/r internal gate turbo that makes close to 280rwkw without spending a fortune on a hks item. :P

That's what I wanted too Cubes 260-280 rwkw every day of the week, that's why I am so happy with my GCG Hiflow with the VG30 rear end. And it fits on stock as.

Ian

Roy,

I'm a little scared of the 1.06 rear. :P

All though the smallish comp cover should reduce spool time.

Bullet,

This Vg30 GCG highflow jobbie, say you accelerate from 2000rpm in second gear with a flat foot, what rpm does it kick? I'm assuming at that point it makes 19psi correct?

Roy,

I'm a little scared of the 1.06 rear. :P

All though the smallish comp cover should reduce spool time.  

Bullet,

This Vg30 GCG highflow jobbie, say you accelerate from 2000rpm in second gear with a flat foot, what rpm does it kick? I'm assuming at that point it makes 19psi correct?

Hi Cubes, I'll do that test tomorrow for you and let you know, otherwise I would be guessing. I've only booted the car when it was at Oran Park last week and I wasn't concentrating on the RPM gauge or the boost gauge, but I'm sure it was less than 4000, just like the normal hiflow, but the power that it was making before it reached maximum boost was enormous and it came as a huge suprise to me. I'd never felt that before. I'll take note of what, where and when tomorrow when I do some testing and report back to you. OK Cubes?

Ian

cubes the hpinabox gt30 will pull 280rwkws. i will post up my new shootout graph once my engine has been rebuilt with forgies. im putting in tomei poncams step ones and dropping comp from 9 to 1 to 8.5 to 1. may even fit a magic cat or at least something better than the one im running. as for this turbo being ordinary, well i dont have the budget for a high mount hks set up. so im very happy with the combination ive got . boost starts at 2500rpm and peaks at 3500rpm , and if i can find another 15 to 20 rwkws i will be over the moon because its a nice balance between power and response is what im looking for.

Black32 only the name has changed , they've got a unified system at last .

GT32's are all bush bearing except HKS's GT3240 which is another cropped bastardised turbine job . Don't mistake GT32 and GT35 compressor maps and look for the all important "R" for rolling element or ball bearing cartridge ie GT3076R .

Cheers A .

It will be good to see the results bigcarl.

Have you any pics to share?

------

My airflow calcs tell me the RB30DET should have the XR6 Turbo on song around ~3600-3700rpm.

Doesn't sound so bad and it would definitely free up the top end VE for the 3ltr extending peak rpm power. :rofl:

IAN ! Ya stranger how ya goin?

You never rang to tell me you one lotto. :rofl:

Thats an awesome result dude heaps happy for ya.

You should come out and visit,it has been -4 degrees and god knows what power im making cos of it.

Snow drift is fun too.

But we will be in forster in the next month so we will catch up.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Well, that's kinda the point. The calipers might interfere with the inside of the barrels 16" rims are only about 14" inside the barrels, which is ~350mm, and 334mm rotors only leave about 8mm outboard for the caliper before you get to 350, And.... that;s not gunna be enough. If the rims have a larger ID than that, you might sneak it in. I'd be putting a measuring stick inside the wheel and eyeballing the extra required for the caliper outboard of the rotor before committing to bolting it all on.
    • OK, so again it has been a bit of a break but it was around researching what had been done since I didn't have access to Neil's records and not everything is obvious without pulling stuff apart. Happily the guy who assembled the engine had kept reasonable records, so we now know the final spec is: Bottom end: Standard block and crank Ross 86.5mm forgies, 9:1 compression Spool forged rods Standard main bolts Oil pump Spool billet gears in standard housing Aeroflow extended and baffled sump Head Freshly rebuilt standard head with new 80lb valve springs Mild porting/port match Head oil feed restrictor VCT disabled Tighe 805C reground cams (255 duration, 8.93 lift)  Adjustable cam gears on inlet/exhaust Standard head bolts, gasket not confirmed but assumed MLS External 555cc Nismo injectors Z32 AFM Bosch 023 Intank fuel pump Garret 2871 (factory housings and manifold) Hypertune FFP plenum with standard throttle   Time to book in a trip to Unigroup
    • I forgot about my shiny new plates!
    • Well, apparently they do fit, however this wont be a problem if not because the car will be stationary while i do the suspension work. I was just going to use the 16's to roll the old girl around if I needed to. I just need to get the E90 back on the road first. Yes! I'm a believer! 🙌 So, I contacted them because the site kinda sucks and I was really confused about what I'd need. They put together a package for me and because I was spraying all the seat surfaces and not doing spot fixes I decided not to send them a headrest to colour match, I just used their colour on file (and it was spot on).  I got some heavy duty cleaner, 1L of colour, a small bottle of dye hardener and a small bottle of the dye top coat. I also got a spray gun as I needed a larger nozzle than the gun I had and it was only $40 extra. From memory the total was ~$450 ish. Its not cheap but the result is awesome. They did add repair bits and pieces to the quote originally and the cost came down significantly when I said I didn't need any repair products. I did it over a weekend. The only issues I had were my own; I forgot to mix the hardener into the dye two coats but I had enough dye for 2 more coats with the hardener. I also just used up all the dye because why not and i rushed the last coat which gave me some runs. Thankfully the runs are under the headrests. The gun pattern wasn't great, very round and would have been better if it was a line. It made it a little tricky to get consistent coverage and I think having done the extra coats probably helped conceal any coverage issues. I contacted them again a few months later so I could get our X5 done (who the f**k thought white leather was a good idea for a family car?!) and they said they had some training to do in Sydney and I could get a reduced rate on the leather fix in the X5 if I let them demo their product on our car. So I agreed. When I took Bec in the E39 to pick it up, I showed them the job I'd done in my car and they were all (students included) really impressed. Note that they said the runs I created could be fixed easily at the time with a brush or an air compressor gun. So, now with the two cars done I can absolutely recommend Colourlock.  I'll take pics of both interiors and create a new thread.
    • Power is fed to the ECU when the ignition switch is switched to IGN, at terminal 58. That same wire also connects to the ECCS relay to provide both the coil power and the contact side. When the ECU sees power at 58 it switches 16 to earth, which pulls the ECCS relay on, which feeds main power into the ECU and also to a bunch of other things. None of this is directly involved in the fuel pump - it just has to happen first. The ECU will pull terminal 18 to earth when it wants the fuel pump to run. This allows the fuel pump relay to pull in, which switches power on into the rest of the fuel pump control equipment. The fuel pump control regulator is controlled from terminal 104 on the ECU and is switched high or low depending on whether the ECU thinks the pump needs to run high or low. (I don't know which way around that is, and it really doesn't matter right now). The fuel pump control reg is really just a resistor that controls how the power through the pump goes to earth. Either straight to earth, or via the resistor. This part doesn't matter much to us today. The power to the fuel pump relay comes from one of the switched wires from the IGN switch and fusebox that is not shown off to the left of this page. That power runs the fuel pump relay coil and a number of other engine peripherals. Those peripherals don't really matter. All that matters is that there should be power available at the relay when the key is in the right position. At least - I think it's switched. If it's not switched, then power will be there all the time. Either way, if you don't have power there when you need it (ie, key on) then it won't work. The input-output switching side of the relay gains its power from a line similar (but not the same as) the one that feeds the ECU. SO I presume that is switched. Again, if there is not power there when you need it, then you have to look upstream. And... the upshot of all that? There is no "ground" at the fuel pump relay. Where you say: and say that pin 1 Black/Pink is ground, that is not true. The ECU trigger is AF73, is black/pink, and is the "ground". When the ECU says it is. The Blue/White wire is the "constant" 12V to power the relay's coil. And when I say "constant", I mean it may well only be on when the key is on. As I said above. So, when the ECU says not to be running the pump (which is any time after about 3s of switching on, with no crank signal or engine speed yet), then you should see 12V at both 1 and 2. Because the 12V will be all the way up to the ECU terminal 18, waiting to be switched to ground. When the ECU switches the fuel pump on, then AF73 should go to ~0V, having been switched to ground and the voltage drop now occurring over the relay coil. 3 & 5 are easy. 5 is the other "constant" 12V, that may or may not be constant but will very much want to be there when the key is on. Same as above. 3 goes to the pump. There should never be 12V visible at 3 unless the relay is pulled in. As to where the immobiliser might have been spliced into all this.... It will either have to be on wire AF70 or AF71, whichever is most accessible near the alarm. Given that all those wires run from the engine bay fusebox or the ECU, via the driver's area to the rear of the car, it could really be either. AF70 will be the same colour from the appropriate fuse all the way to the pump. If it has been cut and is dangling, you should be able to see that  in that area somewhere. Same with AF71.   You really should be able to force the pump to run. Just jump 12V onto AF72 and it should go. That will prove that the pump itself is willing to go along with you when you sort out the upstream. You really should be able to force the fuel pump relay on. Just short AF73 to earth when the key is on. If the pump runs, then the relay is fine, and all the power up to both inputs on the relay is fine. If it doesn't run (and given that you checked the relay itself actually works) then one or both of AF70 and AF71 are not bringing power to the game.
×
×
  • Create New...