Jump to content
SAU Community

PowerFC: Some DIY tuning comments please


Recommended Posts

i had this issue early when i was doing the faq long time ago

i since moved all the content to tables to support the browser resizing it dynamically, and it should deal with it. should be ok ?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I tried it in Firefox and IE and it still seems to have hard coded line feeds.

Also can I please have a copy of your latest map? Gonna do some more road tuning this weekend :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

see attached, rename to .xls

note its knocking a little in the mid area as i got too carried away up the timing in one spot. my car is having its alternator rebuilt so its not in state to datalog and tune but the rest is fine. use it only for comparison reasons, dont load the exact figures

paulr33___193rwkw.txt

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks mate! I'm not loading the exact map, but I'm seeing where you are putting in your biggest timing advances over stock and my tune, and focusing on those areas. Saves me a heap of time not touching the ones which are around the same.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

theres one area where it goes over 80ish

but i need to fix it and will done once i have my alternator done.

right click on the filename link and choose save as.

then save it as a .xls

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Paul, do you remember where the knock goes over 80'ish? Just so I can keep an eye on that area too and not increase it too much. When I was road tuning the other day there was one area where I slowly increased my timing up to nearly what you had and the knock was virtually zero all the while. Around N5-N6 and L1-10. There were other areas which had more knock that were tuned by the workshop, so I think there's still plenty of room for me to increase it there.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

I've made some more changes to my INJ map in the quest for better economy however I don't think it will be good as I expected, time will tell.

I've uploaded my maps to site (in excel and datalogit format) if anyone wants to have a look at them or copy them or do what ever you wish with them.

http://members.dodo.com.au/paul/tunedata/tunedata.html

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've made some more changes to my INJ map in the quest for better economy however I don't think it will be good as I expected, time will tell.

I've uploaded my maps to site (in excel and datalogit format) if anyone wants to have a look at them or copy them or do what ever you wish with them.

http://members.dodo.com.au/paul/tunedata/tunedata.html

Are you sure your base timing is correct? Thats alot of timing. You realise that there is no point advancing the timing past MBT as all you do is increase your HC. My general rule is to pull the timing out until you start to loose power. While this is easy to do on a DYNO at WOT its alot harder under cruise and low load conditions. You really need to watch your HC levels to do low load timing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As far as i know its correct, ive had the car retuned twice from scratch. I basically took the approach of upping the timing on light load / light cruise until it was knocking and then backed if a few deg until it was a smooth balance.

The results were a much more responsive drive and a lively engine. I wasnt trying to gain more power, but was trying to take out the boggy / empty feeling that was expeirenced after a max power only tune. My ignition timing increases only expanded as far as map points 8x8 and only a few deg increase in the last 2 rows for 10x10 so I haven't advanced the timing across the whole map.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've reset my ecu to clear away the wierd idle hunt bug i picked up somehow in the last week or so. Completed the idle learn procedure and saved the stock apexi maps (ill upload tomorrow night). I then loaded in my ign and inj maps and changed my other settings and all is happy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

HC = Hydrocarbons. basically its what you get when you dont burn the air/fuel mix properly.

What has been stated above is pretty correct, once you tune past MBT you end up with some pretty nasty NOx (Nitous Oxides) emissions as well. Basically means your car runs around clubbing baby seals to death..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well i took to the streets of melbourne last night with a wideband sensor up the exhaust for some on road tuning and found my afr's were out by a fair bit thanks to me fiddling around. I've since dialed them back into what I felt was right around 15:1 for light cruise up until around 2400rpm where I'll richen it up every so slightly to keep the egt's down a bit.

An hour of on road wideband tuning certainly made a massive difference as far as the INJ maps are concerned and also checking out realtime adjustments. I also experiemented with 02 feedback on and off and found 02 feedback on was perfect, only once the correct INJ values were dialed in.

I'll post up my INJ and IGN maps soon for those who wish to look, my original gung ho approach of dialing in 1.101 for the first 10x10 was completely wrong and opposite, this meant it was more rich which resulted in 13.5 afr's so I wasting more fuel :(

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • You're confusing two different responders and more than one issue. The stock Neo ECU boost sensor is used by the ECU for protection purposes. It is essentially only an overboost sensor. It is not used for determining engine load for fuelling or ignition purposes. That task falls solely to the AFM. Any aftermarket ECU that either has an onboard MAP sensor or a plug in one, will use the MAP sensor as the primary load sensor. Or I should perhaps say "can", rather than "will", because some of them have the option of using other primary load sensors. That MAP sensor is not for the same function as the stock Neo boost sensor. The reason I recommended against a plug and play ECU is that they are intended to run a particular engine and usually in the car that the particular engine came in. So, if you have a transplanted engine in a different car, with some parts of the original missing (such as the boost sensor, for example) and therefore likely non-standardness of the loom and its insertion into the car's loom, then it is very likely that you will run into the same problems with needing to fix up wiring to make it work that you would with the stock ECU. And, if doing so for the stock ECU is enough of an obstacle that you start considering a standalone plugin as a solution, it should become clear that the plugin is quite possibly not the solution you'd hope it to be. It would just lead to more of the same type of problem solving work to get it going. In the above paragraph and in my earlier post, the lack of the boost sensor is not critical. It was just used as an example of something that we knew you did not have right, such that the stock ECU would not work. I took that as an indicator of a reasonable probability that there were other related problems hiding there.
    • I can think of two places in my city of <1.5million population that specialise in automotive instrument repairs.Unless you're out in the wilds of Quebec, you have 3 major Canadian and 3 major US cities within the same distance as the single nearest city to mine. Surely there is somewhere you could send it.
    • I never cared for twins but whenever these conversations came up, I always presumed the higher number represented a larger turbo. Learn something new everyday. 
    • Interesting, I've never seen a failure like that before but with the age of these cars and the general questionable-ness of all kinds of parts these days you can't rule anything out I suppose. Boost leak testing the boost control system would've revealed this though.
    • Thanks for updating the outcome; while anywhere in the system could leak, I hadn't heard of a wastegate actuator doing so before, can add that to the list of potentials for next time
×
×
  • Create New...