Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

OK so I thought I owned a 2000 model "bayside blue" GT-T coupe.

I checked out this site http://english.auto.vl.ru/catalog/nissan/skyline/

This lists all the different models ever made on a timeline.

It says the only cars made in January 2000 were rare NON TURBO GT-V. It just so happens that unlike the GT-T's made before and after this special edition r34, this GT-V came out in “bayside blue”, a colour that was and is reserved for R34 GTR's.

So what model is my car?

It is turbo and inside looks like a series one GT-T. Yet was made at the time of the special edition GT-V and has its special optional colour.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/79917-what-sort-of-car-do-i-own/
Share on other sites

It says the only cars made in January 2000 were rare NON TURBO GT-V.
Thats wrong. The 'GT-V' non-turbo versions were made from August 2000 to May 2001.
It just so happens that unlike the GT-T's made before and after this special edition r34, this GT-V came out in “bayside blue”, a colour that was and is reserved for R34 GTR's.

So what model is my car?

It is turbo and inside looks like a series one GT-T. Yet was made at the time of the special edition GT-V and has its special optional colour.

Aparently, the 'Bayside Blue' option was such a strong selling point for the GT-V model, that Nissan decided to make the color available for all the R34 models, and even the Stagea at the time. But you say your car was made in *January* 2000? Hmmm... maybe your cars has been resprayed? Whats the paint code on the built plate in the engine bay? Are there any signs that the car could've been resprayed?

You could even have a model that was sold to an employee who had the special color applied as a one off (only to have it released as a stock color lol)... but thats a long shot, and not worthy of increasing the 'selling price' if you know what I mean :)

OK so I thought I owned a 2000 model "bayside blue" GT-T coupe.

I checked out this site http://english.auto.vl.ru/catalog/nissan/skyline/

This lists all the different models ever made on a timeline.

It says the only cars made in January 2000 were rare NON TURBO GT-V. It just so happens that unlike the GT-T's made before and after this special edition r34, this GT-V came out in “bayside blue”, a colour that was and is reserved for R34 GTR's.

So what model is my car?

It is turbo and inside looks like a series one GT-T. Yet was made at the time of the special edition GT-V and has its special optional colour.

Ok, ok... I've solved it.

Common knowledge has it that the R34 GT-V Series 1 was available in Bayside Blue as a 'special color edition' as of January 2000. What people don't know is that the Series 1 GT-T *could also be ordered* with Bayside Blue from January 2000 but wasn't advertised as strongly as the GT-V (had to sell more 25GT's at the time hence the GT-V variant? I don't know). The Bayside blue color was also available for the Stagea... now this color is extremely rare on a Stagea.

The Series 2 R34 Skylines could all be ordered with Bayside Blue, somewhat decreasing it's unique status. Your car is an ordinary R34 25GT Turbo but with a funky color... :)

OK so I thought I owned a 2000 model "bayside blue" GT-T coupe.

I checked out this site http://english.auto.vl.ru/catalog/nissan/skyline/

This lists all the different models ever made on a timeline.

It says the only cars made in January 2000 were rare NON TURBO GT-V. It just so happens that unlike the GT-T's made before and after this special edition r34, this GT-V came out in “bayside blue”, a colour that was and is reserved for R34 GTR's.

So what model is my car?  

It is turbo and inside looks like a series one GT-T. Yet was made at the time of the special edition GT-V and has its special optional colour.

wouldnt you be pissed if it was a number job and your car became a nissan gtt bitsa(bita this and a bita that)

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I know why it happened and I’m embarrassed to say but I was testing the polarity of one of the led bulb to see which side was positive with a 12v battery and that’s when it decided to fry hoping I didn’t damage anything else
    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
×
×
  • Create New...